Case law

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

403 A.2d 737 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1979

See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. FPC, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409, 425 , 283 F.2d 204 , 220, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960); Allentuck v. … of discretion. 7 Stewart v.

JOEL CASTON v. UNITED STATES

146 A.3d 1082 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2016

Bell v. … Walsh v.

Better Business Bureau of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

34 A.2d 614 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1943

In International Reform Federation v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 282 , 131 F.2d 337 , and National Rifle Ass’n v. Young, 77 U.S. … Young v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, 63 Ga.App. 130 , 10 S.E.2d 412 ; Maine Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Androscoggin Junior, Inc., 137 Me. 154 , 16 A,2d 252 ; Murphy v. Concordia Pub.

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

530 A.2d 1163 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1987

Draude v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 527 A.2d 1242, 1250 (D.C.1987) (citations omitted). We agree with the Citizens Association, however, that the Board’s analysis cannot withstand scrutiny. … Under the circumstances, any decision bearing on the merits of how the Board should handle such an application “would serve merely as an advisory opinion.” Ford v. Turner, 531 A.2d 233 , - (D.C.1987) (quoting Banks v.

Fraternal Order of Police MPD Labor Committee v. Public Employee Relations Board

516 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1986

It is essential that individuals be completely free to petition the Board for redress of such grievances. See N.L.R.B. v. … Stokes v. District of Columbia, supra, 502 A.2d at 1010 ; Barry v. Wilson, 448 A.2d 244, 246 (D.C.1982); Kegley v.

In re Joseph J. O'Hara

101 A.3d 433 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2014

In re Brown, 80 A.3d 1043, 1044 (D.C. 2013). We therefore adopt the recommendation of the Board that Mr. O‟Hara be disbarred. 2 After the case was submitted, Mr. … Rather, as noted, he filed no opposition at all to Bar Counsel‟s recommendation to the Board that he be disbarred.

Foxhall Community Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

524 A.2d 759 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1987

District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 388 A.2d 1233, 1238-39 (D.C.1978); Bernstein v. District of Columbia Board of *762 Zoning Adjustment, 376 A.2d 816, 820 (D.C.1977); Salsbery v. … District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 357 A.2d 402, 404-05 (D.C.1976); Dwyer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 320 A.2d 306, 307-08 (D.C.1974); Taylor v.

In re Gizzarelli

888 A.2d 1154 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 2005

XI, § 11(d). 1 We also referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) and directed it to recommend *1155 whether identical, greater, or lesser discipline should be imposed as reciprocal discipline … See, e.g., In re Brown, 797 A.2d 1232 (D.C.2002); In re Cleary, 111 A.2d 786 (D.C.2001). For these reasons, and the lack of anything in the record to indicate that reciprocal discipline is inappropriate, see D.C. Bar R.

Sowder v. Nolan

125 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1956

Young v. Young, 57 App.D.C. 157 , IS F. 2d 807. 2 . Brown v. Shimabukuro, 73 App.D.C. 194 , 118 F.2d 17 . 3 . D.C.Code, § 4-121. 4 . D.C.Code 1951, Supp. IV, Title 1. — Administration, Appendix. … Co. v. Whitton, 13 Wall. 270 , 80 U.S. 270 , 20 L.Ed. 571 . 10 . Collins v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 41 A.2d 515 . 11 . Villaroman v.

Fry & Welch Associates, P.C. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

664 A.2d 1230 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1995

of Columbia v. … Casualty Co. v.

1215 CT, LLC t/a Rosebar Lounge v. DC Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

213 A.3d 605 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2019

Varela v. Hi-Lo Powered Stirrups, Inc., 424 A.2d 61, 64-65 (D.C. 1980) (en banc) (quoting United States v. Goldenberg, 168 U.S. 95, 102-03 (1897)). … Harrison v. N. Tr. Co., 317 U.S. 476, 479 (1943) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

925 A.2d 585 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2007

LEGAL ANALYSIS The Standard of Review Generally, “[o]ur review of the Board’s factual determinations is deferential.” George Washington Univ. v. … See Foggy Bottom Ass’n v.

Udc Faculty Ass'n v. Bd. of Trs. of UDC

205 A.3d 880 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2019

HRH Servs. LLC v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd.

201 A.3d 579 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 2019

National Cathedral Neighborhood Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

753 A.2d 984 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 2000

The applicant has the burden of showing that the proposal complies with the regulation; but once that showing has been made, "the Board ordinarily must grant [the] application.” French v. … In contrast to the separate locations involved in Hilton Hotels Corp. v.

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

642 A.2d 125 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 1994

After this court’s opinion in Speyer v. … “The Board’s interpretation of the [zoning] regulations must be accorded great weight, and must be upheld unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulations.” Glenbrook Rd. Ass’n. v.

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

749 A.2d 1258 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 2000

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: On April 15, 1998, the Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) held a public hearing and granted the application of intervenor Richard T. … United States, 546 A.2d 1001, 1005 (D.C.1988); District of Columbia Dep’t of Human Servs. v.

In Re Sumner

665 A.2d 986 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1995

PER CURIAM: In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) found that respondent, David G. … Marshall’s stepbrother, Thereon Brown, and Mr. Brown’s mother, Diane Wingfield. H.C.R. at 2. Mr.

John D. Neumann Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia, Board of Appeals & Review

268 A.2d 605 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1970

Nee Zap v. United States 328 U.S. 624, 628 , 66 S.Ct. 1277 , 90 L.Ed. 1477 (1946). … Accordingly, the decision of the District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review is Affirmed.

Schreiber v. Schreiber

139 A.2d 278 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1958

In Underwood v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309 , 122 F.2d 219 . 5 . Kimmell v. Kimmell, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 177, 179 , 171 F.2d 340, 342 .