Case law

D.C. Metropolitan Police Dep't v. D.C. Public Employee Relations Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2023

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BOARD, et al., APPELLEES. … See, e.g., Butler v. Metro. Police Dep’t, 240 A.3d 829, 834-35 (D.C. 2020) (describing three different applications of the statute made by an OEA administrative judge, the OEA Board, and the Superior Court); Metro.

Moody v. Winchester Management Corp.

321 A.2d 562 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1974

Thus, in Craig v. … See also Hardebeck v. Hamilton, 50 App.D.C. 113 , 268 F. 703 (1920). Likewise, in Lynch v.

Bundy v. United States

422 A.2d 765 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1980

Smith observed appellant sitting on a brown paper bag at the same bus stop near Gino’s Restaurant. Once again, appellant failed to board several buses that passed. … See Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 387 A.2d 728 (1978); Watts v. United States, D.C.App., 362 A.2d 706 (1976) (en banc).

Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

441 A.2d 889 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1981

Plummer v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors

730 A.2d 159 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1999

Cohen v. Rental Housing Comm’n, 496 A.2d 603, 605 (D.C.1985). … This court “will not set aside any finding, conclusion or action of the Board unless it is found to be ... unsupported by substantial evidence in the record.” Vann v.

D. T. Corp. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

407 A.2d 707 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1979

Sherman v. Commission on Licensure to Practice the Healing Art, D.C.App., 407 A.2d 595 (1979). See SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943); Jameson’s Liquors, Inc. v. … District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 384 A.2d 412 (1978); Dietrich v. Tarleton, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 47 , 473 F.2d 177 (1972).

In re Brown

694 A.2d 886 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1997

PER CURIAM: In this reciprocal discipline proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be suspended for sixty days and required to show fitness before he is allowed to return to the practice … Brown, shall be suspended from the practice of law for sixty days to begin when he has filed the affidavit required by D.C-App. R. XI, § 14(g).

In Re Brown

10 A.3d 619 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 2010

ORDER PER CURIAM On consideration of this court’s April 14, 2010, order referring Bar Counsel’s request to revoke respondent’s probation to the Board on Professional Responsibility for consideration by a Hearing Committee … report and recommendation of the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee, the statement of Bar Counsel, and the entire record, it is ORDERED that Bar Counsel’s motion to revoke probation is granted and the probation imposed on Timothy Brown

Timus v. District of Columbia Department of Human Rights

633 A.2d 751 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1993

Brown v. Capitol Hill Club, 425 A.2d 1309, 1313 (D.C.1981). … Brown v. Capitol Hill Club, supra.

Hilton Hotels Corp. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

363 A.2d 670 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1976

See Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 (1973). Petitioners also urge us to invalidate the Board’s order on procedural grounds. … Petitioners’ reliance on City of Miami Beach v. Stearns, 77 So.2d 626 (Fla.Sup.Ct.1955) is misplaced.

Benton v. United States

815 A.2d 371 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 2003

We rejected a claim of prejudice resulting from Brown’s perjury as to his qualifications in Whitley v. … that he had a degree in pharmacology and was a board-certified pharmacist.

Brentwood Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

661 A.2d 652 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1995

Air Courier Conference v. … Clark's Liquors, Inc. v.

District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. District of Columbia

866 A.2d 788 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2005

Carey v. … Leonard v.

Johnson v. United States

367 A.2d 1316 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1977

Air Pollution Variance Board v. Western Alfalfa Corp., 416 U.S. 861 , 94 S.Ct. 2114 , 40 L.Ed.2d 607 (1974). See also Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583, 591-92 , 94 S.Ct. 2464 , 41 L.Ed.2d 325 (1974). … Munn v. United States, D.C.App., 283 A.2d 28 (1971); United States v. Brown, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 113 , 114 n.1, 463 F.2d 949 , 950 n. 1 (1972).

Vestry of Grace Parish v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

366 A.2d 1110 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1976

[Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938).] *1113 See also Wallace v. … See Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 69 App.D.C. 1, 98 F.2d 282 (1938), and Easton Utilities Commission v. Atomic Energy Commission, supra.

1101 K Street, NW Acquisitions LLC v. DC Board of Zoning Adjustment

160 A.3d 1174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2017

Board of Zoning

District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. District of Columbia

520 A.2d 671 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1986

See Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 441 A.2d 871 (D.C.1980), vacated when we went en banc in Convention Center Referendum Committee v. … See District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics v. Jones, 481 A.2d 456 (D.C.1984).

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

288 A.2d 666 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1972

Mazza v. Cavicchia, 15 N.J. 498, 516 , 105 A.2d 545, 555 (1954); see Hot Shoppes, Inc. v. Clouser, 231 F.Supp. 825 *670 (D.D.C.1964), aff'd, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 353 , 346 F.2d 834 (1965). See also 1 F. … Hyman v. Coe, 102 F.Supp. 254, 257 (D.D.C.1952), cited in Hot Shoppes, Inc. v. Clouser, 231 F.Supp. 825 (D.D.C. 1964), aff'd 120 U.S.App.D.C. 353 , 346 F.2d 834 (1965). (Emphasis added.)

Georgetown Residents Alliance v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

802 A.2d 359 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 2002

Ass’n v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 605 A.2d 22, 32 (D.C.1992). … “The applicant has the burden of showing that the proposal complies with the regulation; but once that showing has been made, the Board ordinarily must grant the application.” National Cathedral Neighborhood Ass’n v.

A. L. W., Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

338 A.2d 428 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 30, 1975

See Shay v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 334 A.2d 175 (1975); Salsbery v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 318 A.2d 894 (1974); Dietrich v. … [Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra at 542 (footnote omitted).]