Case law

Owen v. Board of Directors of Washington City Orphan Asylum

888 A.2d 255 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2005

Board of Directors of the Washington City Orphan Asylum v. Board of Trustees of the Washington City Orphan Asylum, 798 A.2d 1068 (D.C.2002)(Wm4 I). … See Lemon v.

Downs v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

666 A.2d 860 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1995

Fiola v. … ); Nott v.

1000 Feet DC Inc. v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage and Cannabis Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2025

In Singleton v. D.C. … Mahmoud v.

Williams-Godfrey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

570 A.2d 737 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1990

Storer v. … BOEE Exhibit # 14; see also Pitts v.

Singer v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

631 A.2d 1232 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1993

The Standard of Review As we recently noted in Allied Security, Inc. v. … See also Harris v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 592 A.2d 1014, 1016 (D.C.1991); Joseph v. District of Columbia Bd. of Medicine, 587 A.2d 1085, 1088 (D.C.1991); Roberts v.

Breen v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

731 A.2d 843 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 1999

The Board found petitioner was sixty-one percent disabled and thus entitled to an annuity of $15,834.38. Petitioner appealed this determination. In Breen v. … Oubre v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 630 A.2d 699, 702 (D.C.1993).

Batty v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

537 A.2d 204 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1988

We have grave problems with the reasoning of the Board in this respect. While Dr. … , in Baumgartner v.

Gallothom, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

820 A.2d 530 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 2003

Gallothom relies heavily on Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of the District of Columbia, 160 A.2d 100, 101 (Mun.Ct.D.C.1960), to argue that the Board’s decision must be remanded. … Vann v. District of Columbia Bd. of Funeral Directors & Embalmers, 441 A.2d 246, 248 (D.C.1982) (citing JBG Properties, Inc. v.

2461 Corp. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

950 A.2d 50 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2008

This court reviews the factual findings of the Board with deference, reversing only if the findings are not based on substantial evidence in the record as a whole. See Levelle, Inc. v. … See Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown, Inc. v.

Asefu Alemayehu v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

109 A.3d 1095 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2014

Park v. … v.

Alexander v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

783 A.2d 155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 2001

See Allen v. Police and Firefighter’s Ret. and Relief Bd., 528 A.2d 1225, 1229 (D.C.1987); Neer v. District of Columbia Police and Firemen’s Ret. and Relief Bd., 415 A.2d 523, 525 (D.C.1980). … See Wells v. Police & Firefighter’s Ret. & Relief Bd., 459 A.2d 136 (D.C.1983). Here, the Board’s findings that Alexander was unable to perform his duties as a firefighter are unassailable.

George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

429 A.2d 1342 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1981

Monaco v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 409 A.2d 1067, 1070 (1979); Citizens Association of Georgetown, Inc. v. … District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 411 A.2d 959, 961-62 (1979); Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282, 286 (1974); Taylor v.

K.G.S., Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

531 A.2d 1001 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1987

Corp. v. … See also Citizens Ass’n v.

Paul Zukerberg v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics

97 A.3d 1064 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2014

Id. 18 Effective April 27, 2012—prior to the commencement of litigation in this case—the Board of Elections and Ethics (―BOEE‖) was separated into the Board of Elections (―BOE‖) and the Board of Ethics and … Graham, Michael Brown, and Harry Thomas.

Gray v. United States

549 A.2d 347 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 1988

Hardy v. … (Moore referred to appellant as "Gregory Brown," whereas the name he gave the police was Curtis Brown.) If the alias comes up again on retrial, the court and the government should be guided by our decisions in Bailey v.

Rodrigues Rife v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

940 A.2d 964 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2007

In reviewing the decision of the Board, we will reverse only if its findings are unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. See D.C.Code § 2-510 (2001); see also Burge v. … Similarly, in District of Columbia v.

Lamphier v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

698 A.2d 1027 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1997

LEGAL DISCUSSION Paraphrasing Baumgartner v. … Poulnot v. District of Columbia, 608 A.2d 134, 139 (D.C.1992) (coincidences not presumed).

District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 2021

The scope of our review of the Contract Appeals Board’s decisions is well- established. “We review decisions of the Contract Appeals Board deferentially.” Belcon Inc. v. … We “accord ‘great weight’ to the Board’s construction of a government contract, so long as that construction is not unreasonable.” Belcon, 826 A.2d at 384 (Dano Res. Recovery, Inc. v.

In the Matter of Thompson

492 A.2d 866 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1985

Based on stipulated facts, the Board found that Thompson was counsel for the defendant in District of Columbia *867 v. Clarence Holbrook, Jr., in Cr. No. F 4834-82. … See generally, United States v. Hurt, 177 U.S. App.D.C. 15, 19, 543 F.2d 162, 168 (1976); Brown v.

Hall v. Henderson

672 A.2d 1047 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1996

See Brown-Bey v. Hyman, 649 A.2d 8, 10 (D.C.1994) (noting after Greenholtz analysis that “the Board’s determination of an appropriate set-off date does not implicate due process considerations”); White v. … Brown-Bey, 649 A.2d at 10 ; Jones, 647 A.2d at 1117 , and in its parole decisions generally, see McRae v.