Case law

Vann v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers

480 A.2d 688 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1984

In Greene v. … See Daggett v. State Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers, 44 Cal.App.2d 742, 746-47 , 112 P.2d 956, 958 (1941); Biggs v. Department of Registration & Education, supra; Lawless v.

Sandula v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

979 A.2d 32 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2009

Hosp. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 916 A.2d 149, 151 (D.C.2007) (citing Dietrich v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 293 A.2d 470, 473 (D.C.1972); Gay v. … Bochner's substantial medical experience recognized in either the Board’s findings of fact or its conclusions of law. We find these omissions troubling. Cf. Eilers v.

District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. Jones

495 A.2d 752 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1985

Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 441 A.2d 889 (D.C.1981) (en banc). … District of Columbia v. Jones, 481 A.2d 456 (D.C.1984).

Shaw v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

936 A.2d 800 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2007

In calculating an annuity, the Retirement Board considers the average salary for positions that the disabled petitioner “has the capacity to occupy.” Breen v. … Moreover, the Board rested its decision on its finding that Shaw could perform the activities described by the Enhanced Guide, and we are not at liberty to uphold the Board on a different rationale. See Pierce v.

Cocome v. District of Columbia Lottery & Charitable Games Control Board

560 A.2d 547 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1989

In so finding, OEA relied on Christie v. … See generally Scharf v.

Oakland Condominium v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

22 A.3d 748 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2011

The Board urges us to affirm its determination that there existed an “exceptional condition,” in accordance with Monaco as well as De Azcarate v. … Custodial Servs. v.

In Re Rigas

9 A.3d 494 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 2010

In re Delaney, 697 A.2d 1212, 1214 (D.C.1997) (quotation marks omitted); see also In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278, 1279 (D.C.2004) (per curiam) (same). 1 We therefore accept the Board’s Report and Recommendation approving the … See, e.g., In re Belardi, 891 A.2d 224, 224 (D.C.2006) (one-year suspension for pleading guilty to three counts of making false statements to a government agency); In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278, 1279 (D.C.2004) (one-year suspension

Croskey v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

596 A.2d 988 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1991

See Batty v. … Baumgartner v.

Jewell v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

738 A.2d 1228 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1999

The Board is required to give “due regard” to “the capacity of the [police officer] to earn wages or engage in gainful activity,” among other factors. D.C.Code § <N616(e)(2)(B)(v). … The Board argues that Jewell failed to challenge the use of this job as beyond her skills and therefore, it should not be considered on appeal. See Glenbrook Rd. Ass’n v.

Tyler v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

606 A.2d 1362 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1992

W., & Vicinity v. … See also Wolf v.

Davies v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

596 A.2d 992 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1991

See Citizens Against Legalized Gambling v. … Gollin v.

Long v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

728 A.2d 112 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1999

We must affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. See Szewczyk v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Ret. & Relief Bd., 633 A.2d 1, 1 (D.C.1993) (per curiam); Baumgartner v. … D.C.Code § 4-616(e)(2)(B)(v).

In Re Pennington

921 A.2d 135 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 2007

Pennington] submitted another[, unrelated] Complaint, Brown v. Austin (hereinafter ‘Brown Complaint’), in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Maryland. … Finally, the Maryland court noted that Pennington had been disciplined once before, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Pennington, 355 Md. 61 , 733 A.2d 1029 (1999), again a fact the Board did not mention. 4 .

Price v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

542 A.2d 1249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1988

Jones v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 375 A.2d 1, 5-6 (D.C.1977). See also Coakley v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 370 A.2d 1345 (D.C.1977). … See Dowd v. District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement & Relief Bd., 485 A.2d 212, 215 (D.C.1984); Kirkwood v.

Citizens Coalition v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

619 A.2d 940 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1993

In Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. … Co. v.

Bausch v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

855 A.2d 1121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2004

Epstein, Becker & Green v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 812 A.2d 901, 902-03 (D.C.2002). … See Long v. District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement and Relief Board, 728 A.2d 112, 115 (D.C.1999).

J.C. & Associates v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

778 A.2d 296 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2001

Co. v. … McDaniels v. Brown, 740 A.2d 551 , 554 n. 4 (1999) (quoting Murphy v. McCloud, 650 A.2d 202, 205 (D.C.1994)). 4 .

METROPOLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT.

141 A.3d 1079 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2016

See Kopff v. … The Board may ... conduct further hearings or ... even reach a different result.” Washington Ethical Soc. v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 421 A.2d 14, 19 (D.C.1980) (quoting Salsbery v.

In Re Brown

709 A.2d 724 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1998

PER CURIAM: In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) has found that respondent, Erroll D. … Brown, violated Rule 8.4(d) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct (prohibiting conduct which seriously interferes with the administration of justice) and D.C.

Dorsey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

648 A.2d 675 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1994

See Hessey v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 601 A.2d 3, 9, 15 (D.C.1991) (en banc). … Since appellant has not furnished us with a transcript of that hearing, see Cobb v.