Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

0.37s

  • Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    309 A.2d 112 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1973

    We hold that respondent has carried the burden of proof with substantial evidence irrespective of the holding in Johnson v. … Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 282 A.2d 566 (1971), that the burden of proof is upon petitioner and not the government to show aggravation. Affirmed. .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pierce v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

    882 A.2d 199 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2005

    Affairs v. … Fontenot v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Chagnon v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    844 A.2d 345 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2004

    Watergate W. v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 815 A.2d 762, 765 (D.C.2003) (quoting Dwpont Circle Citizens Ass’n v. … Willson & Sons, Inc. v. Donovan, 222 U.S.App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stoner v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

    368 A.2d 524 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1977

    Lewis v. Board of Appeals and Review, supra; Brewington v. Board of Appeals and Review, supra. … See Lewis v. Board of Appeals and Review, supra; Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review, supra. .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In Re Bettis

    644 A.2d 1023 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1994

    Petitioner also does not challenge the Board's consideration in these proceedings of the charges for which he did not consent to disbarment. See Brown, supra, 617 A.2d at 197. … Here, as in Brown , we conclude that the attorney also acknowledged the seriousness of the remaining charged misconduct.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Upper Georgia Avenue Planning Committee v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    500 A.2d 987 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1985

    Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra note 2, 381 A.2d at 1384 (emphasis in original); accord, Gerber v. … District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 499 A.2d 1193, 1197-1198 (D.C.1985); Donnelly v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra, 452 A.2d at 367 ; Spevak v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bruno v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    665 A.2d 202 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1995

    On the owner’s appeal to the Board of Appeals and Review, see D.C.Code § 6-2909, the Board upheld the fine, noting that there was a live-in janitor on the property who could have informed the owner promptly of litter problems … See Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 250-60 , 72 S.Ct. 240, 243-248 , 96 L.Ed. 288 (1952); Holmes v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Yirenkyi v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

    520 A.2d 328 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1987

    McMillen v. United States, 407 A.2d 603, 605 (D.C.1979); see Brown v. … District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 471 A.2d 271, 272 (D.C.1984); Debruhl v. District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 384 A.2d 421 (D.C.1978). .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martin v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

    532 A.2d 102 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1987

    Seabolt v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 413 A.2d 908, 910-11 (D.C.1980). … See id. at 139 & n. 3; Woody v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 441 A.2d 987, 989 (D.C.1982) (per curiam); Rzepecki v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Allen v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

    528 A.2d 1225 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1987

    E.g., Dowd v. District of Columbia Police and Firefighters’ Retirement and Relief Board, 485 A.2d 212, 217 (D.C.1984); Kirkwood v. … Morgan v. District of Columbia Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 370 A.2d 1322, 1325 (D.C.1977) (footnote omitted). See Kirven v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Hoggard v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

    655 A.2d 320 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1995

    In NLRB v. … Dyer v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Keefe Co. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    409 A.2d 624 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1979

    Melkye v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App. (No. 12899, May 7, 1979). … See United States v. Brown, D.C.App., 309 A.2d 256, 258 (1973).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Gage v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    738 A.2d 1219 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1999

    See D.C.Code § l-1510(b) (1992 Repl.); Robinson v. Smith, 683 A.2d 481, 490 (D.C.1996). Petitioners filed a subsequent motion to reconsider which the Board granted. … We concur in this conclusion, and find no error in the Board’s determination that petitioners failed to satisfy their burden of proof. Cf. Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • LCP, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    499 A.2d 897 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1985

    Code § l-1510(b) (1981); see Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, 459 A.2d 141, 146 (D.C.1983); Liberty v. … Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, supra, 459 A.2d at 146 ; Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 412 , 379 F.2d 453, 466 (1967).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Gebremariam v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

    533 A.2d 909 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1987

    The Board was authorized to suspend or revoke a license for a violation of § 819, with which petitioner was charged. 15 DCMR § 801.1 (1987); Pillis v. … The Board’s decision must be affirmed on appeal if it is supported by substantial evidence. Jones v. District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 455 A.2d 896, 897 (D.C.1983).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Monaco v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    461 A.2d 1049 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1983

    See Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 287 A.2d 535, 542 (D.C.1972). If appropriate, the BZA’s findings of fact fully support the granting of an area variance. … See Keefe Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 409 A.2d 624, 625-27 (D.C.1979).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Ponds

    888 A.2d 234 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2005

    We also considered delay as a mitigating factor in In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278 (D.C.2004). The Board recommended that Brown be suspended for one year with a fitness requirement for reinstatement. Id. at 1279 . … Neither Brown nor Bar Counsel filed objections or exceptions to the Board’s report. 32 Id. at 1279 . We concluded that the recommendation of the Board should be adopted. Id.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Broadus

    560 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1989

    Jones v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 375 A.2d 1, 5 (D.C.1977). … Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 433 A.2d 1114, 1116 (D.C.1981). We examine the record accordingly. III.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Craig v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    721 A.2d 584 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1998

    See Red Star Express v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 606 A.2d 161, 163 (D.C.1992) (citation omitted); Washington Press Club v. … V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Andrews v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

    991 A.2d 763 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2010

    Ctr. v. … Hana v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.