Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

0.76s

  • Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    413 A.2d 152 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1980

    It was held pursuant to a remand ordered by this court in Kopff v. … Kopff v. ABC Board, supra, at 1388. 2 . With commendable candor, petitioners do not contend that any interested party lacked actual notice of the new hearing or was denied an opportunity to express its position.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Foley v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    358 A.2d 305 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1976

    See, Smith v. Murphy, D.C.App., 294 A.2d 357 (1972); Hadnott v. Laird, supra; Camp v. Herzog, supra; Doe v. Martin, 404 F.Supp. 753, 763 (D.D.C.1975). … See McKart v. United States, supra, 395 U.S. at 195 , 89 S. Ct. 1657 ; Camp v. Herzog, supra, 88 U.S. App.D.C. at 374, 190 F.2d at 606 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Retirement Board v. Office of Employee Appeals

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2026

    RETIREMENT BOARD, APPELLANT, V. OFFICE OF EMPLOYEE APPEALS, et al., APPELLEES. … Joyner v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Myrick v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    577 A.2d 757 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1990

    Barbour v. … Citing Kenmore Joint Venture v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Brown

    797 A.2d 1232 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2002

    Brown was the subject of two disciplinary actions against her by the State Bar Court of California. … Brown be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for the period of five years, beginning from November 13, 2000.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    309 A.2d 112 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1973

    We hold that respondent has carried the burden of proof with substantial evidence irrespective of the holding in Johnson v. … Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 282 A.2d 566 (1971), that the burden of proof is upon petitioner and not the government to show aggravation. Affirmed. .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lange v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    407 A.2d 1058 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1979

    See Bernstein v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra; Hauser v. Borough of Catasauqua Zoning Hearing Board, 20 Pa.Cmwlth. 313, 315-17 , 341 A.2d 566, 569-70 (1975). … Accordingly, we affirm the Order of the Board. See SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 88 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943); Silverstone v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    934 A.2d 428 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2007

    Area Transit Auth. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 827 A.2d 35, 40 (D.C.2003). Petitioner cites Brown v. … Ctr. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 746 A.2d 278 , 281 (D.C.2000)) (citing Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 700 A.2d 787, 791 (D.C.1997)) (same). 6 . See, e.g., Bagbonon v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Upper Georgia Avenue Planning Committee v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    500 A.2d 987 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1985

    Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra note 2, 381 A.2d at 1384 (emphasis in original); accord, Gerber v. … District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 499 A.2d 1193, 1197-1198 (D.C.1985); Donnelly v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra, 452 A.2d at 367 ; Spevak v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Employees' Compensation Appeals Board v. Henry

    516 A.2d 941 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1986

    See Garrett v. Washington Air Compressor Co., 466 A.2d 462 , 462 n. 1 (D.C.1983); Carey v. Crane Service Co., 457 A.2d 1102 , 1103 n. 2 (D.C.1983). In November of 1969 when Ms. … Mason v. District of Columbia, 395 A.2d 399, 402 (D.C.1978). Ms.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brooks v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    317 A.2d 864 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1974

    See Williams v. Zuckert, 372 U.S. 765 , 83 S.Ct. 1102 , 10 L. Ed. 136 (1963) (per curiam). See also Goldwasser v. … Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222 , 417 F.2d 1169 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922 , 90 S.Ct. 918 , 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1970). Petitioner’s final claim of error is that Dr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martin v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

    532 A.2d 102 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1987

    Seabolt v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 413 A.2d 908, 910-11 (D.C.1980). … See id. at 139 & n. 3; Woody v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 441 A.2d 987, 989 (D.C.1982) (per curiam); Rzepecki v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Youngblood v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2021

    Grayson v. … Neighbors v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Brown

    766 A.2d 527 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2001

    Brown at the urging of the Board. The Board’s recommendation came in response to a bad check made out by Mr. … Brown’s discipline in this new Maryland case was based on several complaints of misconduct in that state, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    355 A.2d 789 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1976

    Therefore, after suspension, petitioners sought review before respondent Board of Appeals and Review (the Board). … See Bell v. Burson supra; and Orr v. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Best v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    852 A.2d 915 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2004

    Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974)) (rejecting constitutional challenges and upholding Board’s removal of candidate’s name from an election ballot because he had failed to file a nominating petition … See, e.g., Williams v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Allen v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

    471 A.2d 271 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1984

    See D.C.Code § l-1510(a) (1981); Debruhl v. … See Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carpenter v. District of Columbia Traffic Adjudication Appeal Board

    530 A.2d 680 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1987

    See Pillis v. … See Jones v. District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 455 A.2d 896, 897 (D.C.1983) (substantial evidence test). Therefore some period of suspension was warranted.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wallick v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    486 A.2d 1183 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1985

    Sheridan-Kalorama Neighborhood Council v. D.C. … Citizens Committee to Save Historic Rhodes Tavern v. D.C. Dep’t of Housing & Community Development, 432 A.2d 710, 719 (D.C.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Bettis

    644 A.2d 1023 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1994

    Petitioner also does not challenge the Board's consideration in these proceedings of the charges for which he did not consent to disbarment. See Brown, supra, 617 A.2d at 197. … Here, as in Brown , we conclude that the attorney also acknowledged the seriousness of the remaining charged misconduct.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.