Case law

Carliner v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

412 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1980

See Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 398 A.2d 13, 15 (1979). The Board in the instant case after extensive hearings refused to grant the variance. … W., Inc. v. D. C.

Hedgman v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

549 A.2d 720 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1988

Wheeler v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 395 A.2d 85, 88 (D.C.1978). … District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 366 A.2d 1094 (D.C.1976) (three months); Proctor v. Hackers’ Board, 268 A.2d 267 (D.C.1970) (sixty days).

Harvey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

581 A.2d 757 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1990

Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics, 443 A.2d 507 (D.C.1981) (en banc). … See, e.g., Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134, 143-44 , 92 S.Ct. 849, 856 , 31 L.Ed.2d 92 (1972); Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 554-55 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1377-78 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964); Yick Wo v.

Morrison v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

422 A.2d 347 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1980

In Kells v. … Foe v.

Board of Education of DC v. Wilson

290 A.2d 400 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1972

The acceptance form provided that acceptance was “[sjubject to the approval of the Board of Education”. … Coleman v. District of Columbia, 51 U.S.App.D.C. 352 , 279 F. 990 (1922). It was therefore error for the trial court to enter judgment for appellee. Reversed with directions to enter judgment for appellants. 1 .

Mazanderan v. McGranery

490 A.2d 180 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1984

See, e.g., Brown v. Collins, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 68 , 71, 402 F.2d 209, 212 (1968). … Brown v. Collins, supra, 131 U.S.App.D.C. at 72, 402 F.2d at 213 . An independent absolute privilege exists with respect to information furnished to the INS concerning matters within its jurisdiction.

McDuffie v. District of Columbia Board of Elections

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 2023

We considered his petition before the Board of Elections’ deadline for printing primary ballots and issued our order affirming the Board’s decision on April 28, 2022. McDuffie v. D.C. … See Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118-19 (1994) (employing the “presumption that a given term is used to mean the same thing throughout a statute”).

Hubbard v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

366 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1976

Board. … The dismal history of zoning action respecting halfway houses in this area of the District of Columbia is recounted in Dupont Circle Citizen’s Association v.

Muir v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

450 A.2d 412 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 1982

Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 407 A.2d 549 (1979); Schiffman v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C. … The mere existence of substantial evidence contrary to these findings does not allow us to substitute our judgment for that of the Board. Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra.

Smith v. Fairfax Village Condominium VIII Board of Directors

775 A.2d 1085 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2001

The Smiths filed in the Superior Court an action against the Board of Directors of Fairfax Village (Board) alleging wrongful foreclosure (94-CA-11200). … Iann ucci v. Pearlstein, 629 A.2d 555, 559 (D.C.1993) (citing District of Columbia v. Greene, 539 A.2d 1082, 1083-84 (D.C.1988)) (other citations omitted).

Dwyer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

320 A.2d 306 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1974

[Clouser v. David, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 12, 13 , 309 F.2d 233, 234 (1962); emphasis added.] 5 See also Taylor v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjust., D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230 (1973). Moreover, as we held in Palmer v. … We recognize, of course, that Clouser v. David, supra, constitutes the case law of the District of Columbia which we are required to follow. M.A.P. v. Ryan, D.C.App., 285 A.2d 310 (1971).

Allentuck v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage & Industrial Safety Board

261 A.2d 826 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1969

SEC v. Chenery, 332 U.S. 194, 196 , 67 S.Ct. 1575 , 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947); Braniff Airways v. CAB, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 132 , 135, 306 F.2d 739 , 742 (1962). See also footnote 24, infra. … Secretary of Agriculture v. United States, 347 U.S. 645, 654 , 74 S.Ct. 826 , 98 L.Ed. 1015 (1954); Easton Pub. Co. v. FCC, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 33, 36 , 175 F.2d 344, 347 (1949); WAIT Radio v.

In Re Sofaer

728 A.2d 625 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1999

The leading case interpreting predecessor DR 9-101(b), Brown v. … of former government employment is Brown v.

Lawrence v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

611 A.2d 529 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1992

D’Elia & Marks Co. v. Lyon, 31 A.2d 647, 648 (D.C.Mun.App.1943) (quoting Barney v. … Rudd v. Rudd, 278 A.2d 120, 121 (D.C.1971).

Atkinson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

597 A.2d 863 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1991

See United States v. Alston, 580 A.2d 587, 590-91 (D.C.1990). 6 . … See Atchison v. District of Columbia, 585 A.2d 150, 154-55 (D.C.1991).

Lechter-Siegel v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

395 A.2d 57 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1978

Accordingly, the Board ruled petitioner ineligible for benefits. … Although “good cause” for the failure to report has not been defined, see Kober v.

Olsen v. District of Columbia Physical Therapists Examining Board

227 A.2d 392 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1967

We are convinced that the action of the Board was not arbitrary, and that the record made by petitioner did not require the Board to grant him registration. … This Section is set out in detail in Sherman v. Physical Therapists Examining Board, D.C.App., 208 A.2d 728, 729 (1965).

Daniel v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

329 A.2d 773 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1974

In reviewing such regulations we recognize that “our only task is to determine whether the Board’s interpretation is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulations.” Taylor v. … Viator v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 291 (1974); Palmer v. Board of Zoning Ad *776 justment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535 (1972).

Bartel v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

808 A.2d 1240 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 2002

Bartel, a registered Independent voter, submitted unsigned nominating petition forms to the respondent District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics and requested that the Board place his name on the ballot as an Independent … Carr Mgm’t, Inc. v. National Delicatessen, Inc., 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C.1979). Mr. Bartel is correct that D.C.Code § l-1001.08(j)(1)(b) (2001) does not include “U.S.

Parks v. Emory

68 A.2d 677 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1949

Title to the building is in the Church’s board of trustees and Parks by appointment of the board is managing agent of the building. The minister is not a member of the board of trustees. … of the apartment by Emory to Brown.