Case law

Gollin v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

359 A.2d 590 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1976

Urging that petitioners have not exhausted their administrative remedies, the Board relies upon our recent opinion in Foley v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, D.C.App., 358 A.2d 305 (1976). … See Kamins v. Board of Elections for District of Columbia, D.C.App., 324 A.2d 187 (1974); Curtis v. Bindeman, D.C.App., 261 A.2d 515 (1970).

Roumel v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

417 A.2d 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1980

See Palmer v. Board *408 of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535 (1972). … Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 398 A.2d 13, 15 (1979).

In Re Brown

946 A.2d 379 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2008

PER CURIAM: In this reciprocal disciplinary proceeding against Respondent Ronald Allen Brown, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended that we impose reciprocal and identical discipline of disbarment … Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Brown, 380 Md. 661 , 846 A.2d 428 (2004). After the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarred Mr.

Hessey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

601 A.2d 3 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1991

Keefe v. St. … See United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 27 , 68 S.Ct. 376, 381 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948); Cabell v.

Scolaro v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

691 A.2d 77 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1997

V. … See Dunn v.

Park v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

555 A.2d 1029 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1989

Upper Georgia Avenue Planning Committee v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 500 A.2d 987, 992 (D.C.1985) (citing cases); see Consolo v. … Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 288 A.2d 666, 670-671 (D.C.1972); see Northeast Liquors, Inc. v.

Brizill v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

911 A.2d 1212 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2006

Referendum Comm. v. … See McConnell v.

Miller v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

294 A.2d 365 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1972

See generally Brewster v. Kinlein, D.C.App., 209 A.2d 788, 789 (1965); Brown v. Murphy, supra; Tanner v. DeSapio, 2 Misc.2d 130, 134 , 150 N.Y.S. 2d 640, 644-645 (1956). … See also Brown v. Murphy, 34 Misc.2d 151, 158 , 224 N.Y.2d 423 , 430 (1962). .

Hoage v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of DC

714 A.2d 776 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1998

Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 527 A.2d 313, 316 (D.C.1987) (citations and footnote omitted). … E.g., Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc., 481 U.S. 252, 264 , 107 S.Ct. 1740 , 95 L.Ed.2d 239 (1987); Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Barry v.

Jones v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board

455 A.2d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1983

I The Board’s decision must be affirmed on appeal if it is supported by substantial evidence. Pillis v. District of Colombia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, D.C.App., 366 A.2d 1094, 1095 (1976); Proctor v. … Liberty v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 191, 192 (1979). Here, there is no such evidence.

Benjamin Rose Institute v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

355 A.2d 569 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1976

Benjamin Rose Institute v. District Unemp. Comp. Bd., D.C.App., 338 A.2d 104 (1975). 2 . … Any claimant, his most recent employer and any of his base period employers may appeal to the Board from the determination of any agent of the Board with respect to the payments of benefits to such claimant provided the appeal

Davidson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

617 A.2d 977 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1992

Porianda v. … See Maynard v.

Salsbery v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

357 A.2d 402 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1976

Board of Appeals of Hingham, 343 Mass. 421 , 179 N.E.2d 269 (Sup.Jud.Ct, Plymouth, Mass.1962). See Dwyer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 306 (1974); Taylor v. … See Salsbery v.

Dwyer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

320 A.2d 306 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 24, 1974

[Clouser v. David, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 12, 13 , 309 F.2d 233, 234 (1962); emphasis added.] 5 See also Taylor v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjust., D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230 (1973). Moreover, as we held in Palmer v. … We recognize, of course, that Clouser v. David, supra, constitutes the case law of the District of Columbia which we are required to follow. M.A.P. v. Ryan, D.C.App., 285 A.2d 310 (1971).

Whitley v. United States

783 A.2d 629 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2001

At various times, Brown has claimed to possess a Ph.D and other degrees in pharmacology, see, e.g., id. at 124, and to be a “Board certified pharmacist.” See, e.g., United States v. … In the present case, as noted by the trial judge, supra page 631, Brown testified under oath that he was a Board-certified pharmacist and that he had dispensed narcotics per prescription.

Franchak v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department

932 A.2d 1086 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2007

But, if “the Board has not interpreted a specific portion of the Act, the MPD may be guided by the workers’ compensation decisions of the Department of Employment Services.” Referring to Allen v. … In reviewing an agency decision under the Act, we “defer[ ] to the Board’s reasonable interpretation of the law it is charged with implementing,” Pierce v.

Williams v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

804 A.2d 316 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2002

In Brousseau v. … Lawson v.

Morrison v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

422 A.2d 347 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1980

In Kells v. … Foe v.

Mendelson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

645 A.2d 1090 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1994

The Board, in its order, summarized the parties’ respective positions as follows: 11. … Glenbrook Road Ass’n v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 605 A.2d 22, 31 (D.C.1992) (quoting Levy v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 570 A.2d 739, 746 (D.C.1990)); see also Draude v.

Harvey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

581 A.2d 757 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1990

Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics, 443 A.2d 507 (D.C.1981) (en banc). … See, e.g., Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134, 143-44 , 92 S.Ct. 849, 856 , 31 L.Ed.2d 92 (1972); Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 554-55 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1377-78 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964); Yick Wo v.