Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

0.44s

  • Parsons v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    61 A.3d 650 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2013

    Petitioner Charles Parsons seeks review of an order of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (“BZA”) granting special exceptions from zoning requirements in connection with proposed construction by one of Mr

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    663 A.2d 489 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1995

    v. … On these facts, the Board reasonably relied on Curtis v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gibson v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

    785 A.2d 1238 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 2001

    Public Employee Relations Board v. Washington Teachers’ Union Local 6, 556 A.2d 206, 207 (D.C.1989). … District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board, 655 A.2d 320, 323 (D.C.1995) (quoting District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re Brown

    890 A.2d 260 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 2006

    In re Brown, 845 A.2d 519, 520 (D.C.2004). … See Brown, supra, 845 A.2d at 522 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gerber v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    499 A.2d 1193 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1985

    Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 407 A.2d 549, 553 (D.C.1979). … Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra, 407 A.2d at 555 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Metropolitan Washington Board of Trade v. Public Service Commission

    432 A.2d 343 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1981

    Petitioner Board of Trade has demonstrated no “fatal flaw” with respect to this aspect of the Commission’s decision. Goodman v. Public Service Commission, supra, 309 A.2d at 101 . … V.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hanke v. District of Columbia Board of Elections

    353 A.2d 301 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1976

    The Board granted a stay of its order pending appeal. . See Junghans v. Dept. of Human Resources, D.C.App., 289 A.2d 17, 22-25 (1972). . See American Federation of Government Employees v. … See generally Lewis v. District of Columbia Bd. of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 330 A.2d 253, 256 (1974); Souder v. Brennan, 367 F.Supp. 808, 812-13 (D.D.C.1973). . Cf. F.T.C. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Crider v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    299 A.2d 134 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1973

    Emphasizing these aspects of the testimony, the Board, relying upon Blohm v. … See Paxton v. Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 282 A.2d 566 (1971).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Miller v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    948 A.2d 571 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 29, 2008

    We “will defer to the Board’s findings and will not second-guess the Board’s decision unless it is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown v. … Board’s interpretation”).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. Jones

    481 A.2d 456 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1984

    Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 441 A.2d 889, 911 (D.C.1981) (en banc). … If the initiative were ruled proper and passed by the electorate, Board of Trade members would be required to pay increased unemployment contributions. See Calvin-Humphrey v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gilmartin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    579 A.2d 1164 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1990

    See A.L.W. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 338 A.2d 428, 431 (D.C.1975). In Taylor v. … Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C. App., 388 A.2d 428, 431 (1975); and (2) the practical difficulties are unique to the particular property. Barbour v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Gorgone v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    973 A.2d 692 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2009

    See Kuri Bros. v. … The decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustment is Affirmed. 1 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Carroll v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    292 A.2d 161 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1972

    Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 532, 534 (1972). 7 . D.C.Code 1967, §§ 1-1501 to 1-1510 (Supp. V, 1972). See Cardillo v. Liberty Mut. Ins. … In Johnson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Reins v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    572 A.2d 122 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1990

    Park Citizens Ass’n v. … Park Community Ass’n v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Barbour v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    358 A.2d 326 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1976

    District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra at 430; Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282, 285 (1974); Stewart v. … See Palmer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra; D.C.Code 1973, § 5-420(3).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • O'Rourke v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

    46 A.3d 378 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2012

    Vargo v. Barry, 667 A.2d 98, 101 (D.C.1995) (quoting Brown v. Jefferson, 451 A.2d 74, 77 (D.C.1982)) (emphasis added). … Brown v. Jefferson, 451 A.2d 74, 77 (D.C.1982). . 783 A.2d 623 (D.C.2001). 50. Id. at 627 (citation omitted). . Asylum Co. v. D.C. Dep't of Emp’t Servs., 10 A.3d 619, 628 (D.C.2010) (quoting Dowling v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    305 A.2d 243 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1973

    after remand from the B.A.R. for findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Wingo v. … Such procedure was approved of and recommended in Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 532 (1972).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lenkin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    428 A.2d 356 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1981

    Sheridan-Kalorama Neighborhood Council v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 411 A.2d 959, 961 (1979). … [Gagne v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Perkins v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    813 A.2d 206 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2002

    United States v. Pritchett, 470 F.2d 455, 459 (D.C.Cir.1972); see also District of Columbia v. Smith, 329 A.2d 128, 130 (D.C.1974). … District of Columbia v. Smith, 329 A.2d 128, 130 (D.C.1974). .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Walsh v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    826 A.2d 375 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2003

    See Felicity’s, Inc. v. … The Board’s reading of the pertinent regulation was flawed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.