Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
7.82s
Lambert v. Board of Com'rs of District of Columbia
116 A.2d 926 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1955
In Chappelle v. Board of Commissioners of Dist. of Col., D.C.Mun.App., 110 A.2d 697 , we held this to be proper.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBrewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review
299 A.2d 145 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1973
See Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 532 (1972) (hereinafter Brewington /). … More recently in Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 293 A.2d 470 (1972), this court, relying on Allentuck and Palmer v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedANC 2C v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage and Cannabis Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2025
See generally Colao v. Cnty. … Petitioners’ reliance on Neill v. D.C. Public Employee Relations Board, 93 A.3d 229 (D.C. 2014) is similarly misplaced. There, we held that Sup. Ct. Agency Rev.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBradford v. D. C. Hacker's License Appeal Board
396 A.2d 988 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1979
Debruhl v. District of Columbia Hacker’s License Appeal Board, D.C.App., 384 A.2d 421 (1978), citing Goldsmith v. Clabaugh, 55 App.D.C. 346 , 6 F.2d 94 (1925). … See also Richards v. District of Columbia Hacker’s License Appeal Board, D.C.App., 357 A.2d 439, 441 (1976).]
Cited 4 timesPublishedLevy v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
570 A.2d 739 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1990
See Draude v. … Power Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 455 A.2d 374, 377-78 (D.C.1982); Washington Urban League v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 295 A.2d 906, 908 (D.C.1972), quoting Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S.
Cited 45 timesPublishedEconomides v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
954 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2008
V. … v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedFleischman v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
27 A.3d 554 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2011
.”); Von Gerichten v. … Carliner v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedWieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
383 A.2d 7 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1978
ABC Board, D.C.App., 302 A.2d 235 (1973), and whether the conclusions of the Board flow rationally from these findings, Stewart v. BZA, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 (1973).’ Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc. v. … Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282, 285 (1974).
Cited 17 timesPublishedHines v. District of Columbia Board of Parole
567 A.2d 909 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1989
Appellant is not requesting merely the neutral type of information describing the Board’s procedures, see United States Dept, of Justice v. … Holland v. Hannan, 456 A.2d 807, 814 (D.C.1983); Wyman v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHill v. District of Columbia Board of Parole
766 A.2d 497 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 2000
See Alston v. United States, 590 A.2d 511, 514 (D.C.1991). … another offense), and the District of Columbia Board of Parole had no duty to hold a parole revocation hearing, see also Moody v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNational Broadcasting Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
380 A.2d 998 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1977
See Doherty v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 283 A.2d 206 (1971). There is no assertion that when NABET struck NBC on April 1, 1976, it was not engaged in a labor dispute. … See, e. g., Adams v. Industrial Commission, 490 S.W.2d 77 (Mo.1973); Baltimore Typographical Union No. 12 v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLee v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review
423 A.2d 210 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1980
See, e. g., Apartment and Office Building Ass’n of Metropolitan Washington v. Washington, D.C.App., 343 A.2d 323, 331 (1975); Board of Elections v. Democratic Central Committee, D.C.App., 300 A.2d 725, 726 (1973). … Compare Masszonia v.
Cited 32 timesPublishedSilverstone v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
372 A.2d 1286 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1977
Brown v. Gerhardt, 5 Ill.2d 106 , 125 N.E.2d 53 (1955), cited by petitioners in support of their contention is inapposite. … Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535, 542 (1972).
Cited 16 timesPublishedDraude v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
527 A.2d 1242 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1987
Palmer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 287 A.2d 535, 540 (D.C.1972). … See Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372 (D.C.1977).
Cited 25 timesPublishedShay v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
334 A.2d 175 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1975
See also Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535, 538 (1972); Robey v. Schwab, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 307 F.2d 198 (1962); 2 K. Davis, Administrative Law § 16.05 at 444 (1958). … See, e. g., Goldstein v. Zoning Board of Review, City of Warwick, 101 R.I. 728 , 227 A.2d 195 (R.I.1967).
Cited 14 timesPublishedMallof v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
1 A.3d 383 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2010
In Winpisinger v. … See also Kardules v.
Cited 13 timesPublished31 A.2d 699 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1943
Peterson v. A. Guthrie & Co., D.C., 3 F.Supp. 136 . Goldenborg v. Murphy, 108 U.S. 162 , 2 S.Ct. 388 , 27 L.Ed. 686 . Agudo v. Monterey Co., 13 Cal.2d 285 , 89 P.2d 400 . Cautlay & Tanzola v. … Co., D.C., 36 F.Supp. 233 , Atkocus v. Terker, supra, Emerson v. Mary Lincoln Candies, supra, Abroe v. Lindsay Bros. & Co., supra, Adair v. Traco Division, 192 Ga. 59 , 14 S.E.2d 466 , Stringer v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedAlton Railroad v. Railroad Retirement Board
1 D.C. 263 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1933
This Board and its individual members are the defendants in the case. The Act is entitled “An Act to provide a retirement system for railroad employees, to provide unemployment relief, and for other purposes.” … The Retirement Board is given authority, if as and when necessary to increase the percentage fixed in the Act, without, however, altering the ratio between employee and carrier contributions.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGordon v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
442 A.2d 107 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1981
Gordon sought review of the Board’s decision and this court, noting that the record was devoid of specific findings, remanded the case for a new hearing and determination of law. Gordon v. … Id. at 1254; Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 694, 696 (1977). See D.C.Code 1981, § 1-1510.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHaight v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
439 A.2d 487 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1981
District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 294 A.2d 365, 369 (1972), [quoted in Woods v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, supra, at 373]; see Lewis v. … V.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna