Case law

Goto v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

423 A.2d 917 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1980

Housing *924 Authority v. Wind, 337 S.W.2d 554, 558 (Mo.Ct.App.1960); Cave v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 49 A.D.2d 228, 231 , 373 N.Y.S.2d 932, 935 (App.Div.1975). … Beacon Court Inc. v. Wind, 309 S.W.2d 663, 665-66 (Mo.Ct.App.1958); Hunter v. Board of Appeals, 4 A.D.2d 961, 962 , 168 N.Y.S.2d 148, 150-51 (App.Div.1957) (mem.).

Taylor v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

308 A.2d 230 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1973

In Palmer v. … See 3 Anderson § 14.45 and compare Wilcox v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 17 N.Y.2d 249 , 270 N.Y.S.2d 569 , 217 N.E.2d 633 (1966).

Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education

359 A.2d 28 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1976

v. … Appellant sued the Board of Higher Education and the individual Board members for money damages. The Board itself may not be a suable entity since no statute confers on it the status of a legal entity, see Miller v.

Faulkenstein v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

727 A.2d 302 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1999

See Williamson v. … V.

Schiffmann v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

302 A.2d 235 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1973

V, 1972), the Board made findings of fact from which it was concluded that the applicant met the requirements of the Act, D.C.Code 1967, § 25-115(a)6 (Supp. … The contention that the Board failed to make the finding required by D. C.Code 1967, § 25-115(a)6 (Supp. V, 1972), is clearly without merit.

Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of Dist. of Columbia

160 A.2d 100 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1960

Raleigh City Board of Education, D.C.E.D.N.C., 164 F.Supp. 853 , affirmed 4 Cir., 265 F.2d 95 ; United States ex rel. Chin Cheung Nai v. Corsi, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 55 F.2d 360 ; Fox v. … See also Reilly v. Pinkus, 338 U.S. 269 , 70 S.Ct. 110 , 94 L.Ed. 63 . Appellate courts usually lean heavily on findings of administrative boards, as they do on judges’ findings and jury verdicts.

Salsbery v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

318 A.2d 894 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1974

Our decision in Palmer v. … Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 532 (1972).

Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

407 A.2d 549 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1979

The Board correctly noted that it was under no duty to protect existing licenses from competition. Clark’s Liquors, Inc. v. D. C. ABC Board, D.C.App., 274 A.2d 414 (1971). … Kopff v. D. C. ABC Board, D.C.App., 381 A.2d 1372, 1384 (1977) (emphasis in original).

In re Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2024

Brown, pro se. Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, with whom Hamilton P. Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, was on the brief, for appellee. … Brown argues that the Board erred because it did not consider his engagement agreement with Mr. Bahri.

Coumaris v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

660 A.2d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1995

Co. v. … As we stated in Dietrich v.

Gropp v. District of Columbia Board of Dentistry

606 A.2d 1010 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1992

Nursing Home v. … First, we find no indication of any intentional delay by the Board. See Hallenbeck v. Kleppe, supra, 590 F.2d at 855 .

Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

443 A.2d 507 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1981

Lee v. … See Jameson’s Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 384 A.2d 412, 420-21 (1978); Hill v.

In re Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2024

Brown, pro se. Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, with whom Hamilton P. Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, was on the brief, for appellee. … Brown argues that the Board erred because it did not consider his engagement agreement with Mr. Bahri.

Wheeler v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

395 A.2d 85 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1978

See A.L.W., Inc. v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 338 A.2d 428 (1975); Palmer v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535 (1972). … See Citizen’s Ass’n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia ABC Board, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 861 (1973) (Board substantially complied with court’s order on remand). 10 . See Stewart v. D.C.

Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

433 A.2d 1114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1981

Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra, at 11. Furthermore, we held in Nathanson v. … Stewart v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 (1973).

Hernandez v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 2026

Fleischman v. D.C. Bd. Of Zoning Adjustment, 27 A.3d 554, 557 (D.C. 2011) (quoting Economides v. D.C. Bd. … See Gilmartin v. D.C.

Hollingsworth v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

375 A.2d 515 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1977

Unlike Hill v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 302 A.2d 226 (1973), upon which petitioner relies, there are no disputed issues of fact here. … Comm’n, 43 Del. 274 , 46 A.2d 137 (1946), aff’d, 43 Del. 553 , 53 A.2d 761 (1947); Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v.

Holzsager v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

979 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2009

Ctr. v. … See also Gersman v.

Ahmed v. District of Columbia Hackers License Appeal Board

501 A.2d 415 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1985

Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410, 414 , 65 S.Ct. 1215, 1217 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 (1945); Dankman v. … Russell v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 402 A.2d 1231, 1234 (D.C.1979).

Lewis v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

330 A.2d 253 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1974

[Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review, supra, 282 A.2d at 570 .] Thereafter, however, in Brewington v. … Porter v. Murray, D.C., 69 F.Supp. 400, 402 .” Davidson v. Gardner, 370 F.2d 803, 828 (6th Cir. 1966). Petitioner’s contention that the evidence does not support the findings of the Retirement Board is without merit.