Case law

In Re Zilberberg

612 A.2d 832 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1992

Zilberberg’s suspension in Virginia are summarized in the order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (“the Virginia Board”). The suspension arose from his representation of Julia Brown in a personal injury case. … Brown’s claim against its insured. One-third of this check constituted Zilber-berg’s fee.

Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

381 A.2d 1372 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1977

Wallace v. District Unemployment Comp. Board, D.C.App., 294 A.2d 177 (1972); Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Gardner, 417 F.2d 1086 (4th Cir. 1969). … Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 268 A.2d 801 (1970); Sophia’s Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 268 A.2d 799 (1970).

Spencer v. Practical Nurses' Examining Board

217 A.2d 602 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1966

On June 1, 1965, petitioner moved to reopen the proceedings before the Board. 2 This motion was rejected by the Board on June 22, 1965, on the grounds that (1) it was not timely filed; (2) it did not show good cause; and … Diatz v. Washington Technical School, D.C.Mun.App., 73 A.2d 227 (1950).

Benjamin Rose Institute v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

338 A.2d 104 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 14, 1975

In reviewing this appeal it was discovered that a transcript of the District of Columbia proceeding had not been certified by the Board as part of the record on appeal and it was necessary to request the Board to supplement … We trust that this problem will not recur and that in the future the Board will certify the complete record of the administrative proceedings on appeal. 5 .D.O.Oode 1973, § 46-316(c) states: The Board shall participate in

Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

293 A.2d 470 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 1972

See Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 532, 534 (1972), and cases cited therein. … [Joseph v. F.C.C., 131 U.S.App.D.C. 207 , 211, 404 F.2d 207 , 211 (1968).] See also National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 313, 317 , 438 F.2d 154, 158 (1970); 2 F.

Barnes v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

759 A.2d 1073 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2000

Smith v. Quick, 680 A.2d 396, 398 (D.C.1996) (citing Bennett, 633 A.2d at 826 ); accord, Brown-Bey v. Hyman, 649 A.2d 8, 9 (D.C.1994); In re Tate, 63 F.Supp. 961, 962 (D.D.C.) … of innocence”); United States v.

Chappelle v. Board of Commissioners of Dist. of Col.

110 A.2d 697 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1955

Udebiuwa v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

818 A.2d 160 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 2003

We affirm the Board’s order. The post-trial settlement of the malpractice action mooted the litigation. For that reason the settlement required the dismissal of the pending appeal. See Milar Elevator Co. v. … Nursing Home v.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

926 A.2d 140 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2007

According to this provision, the Review Board “may not consider the evidence de novo and make factual findings different from those of the examiner.” Marriott Int’l v. … What the Board could not do was issue an award of compensation.

Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

999 A.2d 89 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2010

V. … The Board's brief refers to the "more than 200 District rights and responsibilities of civil marriage.” . See Estenos v. PAHO/WHO-Fed.

Schiffmann v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

302 A.2d 235 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1973

V, 1972), the Board made findings of fact from which it was concluded that the applicant met the requirements of the Act, D.C.Code 1967, § 25-115(a)6 (Supp. … The contention that the Board failed to make the finding required by D. C.Code 1967, § 25-115(a)6 (Supp. V, 1972), is clearly without merit.

Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

305 A.2d 516 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 16, 1973

Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 68 App.D.C. 282, 287 , 96 F.2d 554, 559 (1938), as specifically applied to decisions of the Board of Zoning Adjustment, Robey v. Schwab, 113 U.S. … In sum, the applicant must make the requisite showing, and once he has, the Board ordinarily must grant his application. Robey v. Schwab, supra 307 F.2d at 201; Hyman v. Coe, 146 F.Supp. 24, 27, 32 (D.D.C.1956).

Abadie v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

916 A.2d 913 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2007

The Contract Appeals Board sustained the protest on one of the added grounds, rejecting the argument that it was untimely, and the Superior Court upheld the Board. … Mgt. of Md., Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 877 A.2d 96, 105-06 (D.C.2005); Bio-Medical Applications of the District of Columbia v.

Neill v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

93 A.3d 229 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 2014

Francis v. Recycling Solutions, Inc., 695 A.2d 63, 70-71 (D.C.1997). . 680 A.2d at 437 (citation omitted); cf. Brown v. District of Columbia Pub. Emp. … Board such order of enforcement [upon petition by an aggrieved party] as in the case of a request by the Board under subsection (b)_”). .

Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

320 A.2d 282 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1974

ABC Board, D.C.App., 302 A.2d 235 (1973), and whether the conclusions of the Board flow rationally from these findings, Stewart v. BZA, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 (1973).” Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc. v. … Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 293 A.2d 470 (1972). .

Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Board of Public Works

8 D.C. 119 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1873

Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education

359 A.2d 28 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1976

v. … Appellant sued the Board of Higher Education and the individual Board members for money damages. The Board itself may not be a suable entity since no statute confers on it the status of a legal entity, see Miller v.

Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

433 A.2d 1114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1981

Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra, at 11. Furthermore, we held in Nathanson v. … Stewart v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 (1973).

Hammond v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

756 A.2d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2000

In North Carolina v. … See, e.g., Marshall v. Lansing, 839 F.2d 933 (3rd Cir.1988); Kindred v. Spears, 894 F.2d 1477 (5th Cir.1990); Bono v. Benov, 197 F.3d 409 (9th Cir.1999).

Board of Trustees of Univ. of DC v. DiSalvo

974 A.2d 868 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 2009

In Ellis v. … Similarly, in Clement v.