Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
0.49s
Fisher v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
351 A.2d 502 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1976
Lewis v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 330 A. 2d 253 (1974); Blohm v. Tobriner, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 2 , 350 F.2d 785 (1965). … See Lewis v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, supra; Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 282 A.2d 566 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1175 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
Cited 2 timesPublishedMannan v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine
558 A.2d 329 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 1989
Peters v. … Co. v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedPalace Restaurant, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
271 A.2d 561 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1970
We, therefore, reverse the Board’s denial and remand the case for further proceedings consistent herewith. Cf. Rodale Press, Inc. v. F. T. C., 132 U.S.App.D.C. 317, 321 , 407 F.2d 1252, 1256 (1968). … We will not presume, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, that the Board was improperly motivated to exercise power not assigned to it. United States v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedMalcolm Price, Inc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
350 A.2d 730 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1976
See Siaba-Fernandez v. Rosenberg, 302 F.2d 139 (9th Cir. 1962); Olinger v. Partridge, 196 F.2d 986 (9th Cir. 1952). … If the Board proposes to change the appeals examiner’s decision, the procedure set forth in Carey v. District Unemployment Compensation Bd., D.C.App., 304 A.2d 18 (1973), and Wallace v.
Cited 13 timesPublished851 A.2d 1278 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2004
Neither Brown nor Bar Counsel filed objections or exceptions to the Board’s report in this court. “[I]n such circumstances our review of the Board’s recommendation is ‘especially deferential.’” … The Board concluded that Brown’s plea constituted clear and convincing evidence supporting the Hearing Committee’s finding that Brown had violated Rule 8.4(b).
Cited 6 timesPublishedWells v. District of Columbia Board of Education
386 A.2d 703 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 1978
In Matala v. Washington, supra, a police officer petitioned this court for review of the decision of the Metropolitan Police Special Trial Board to fine him for misconduct. … In Johnson v. Board of Appeals & Review, supra, former members of the United States Park Service sought review of a decision of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement Board denying them certain retirement benefits.
Cited 12 timesPublishedKirven v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
379 A.2d 1186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1977
[Morgan v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, D.C.App., 370 A.2d 1322, 1325 (1977) (footnote omitted).] … [Stoner v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, D.C.App., 368 A.2d 524, 531 (1977) (footnote omitted).]
Cited 1 timesPublishedWashington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
379 A.2d 694 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1977
Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 346 A.2d 252, 255 (1975), quoting Coulter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 16 Pa.Cmwlth. 462 , 332 A.2d 876 (1975). … See also Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 294 A.2d 177, 178-79 (1972).
Cited 13 timesPublishedAbadie v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board
843 A.2d 738 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2004
See Kelly v. District of Columbia, 765 A.2d 976, 978 (D.C.2001). We said in Carter v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. … Id. at 1210; see also District of Columbia v.
Cited 19 timesPublished605 A.2d 47 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1992
Appendix DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY In the Matter of: IVAN V. WHITE, JR., Respondent. … In October, 1990, Respondent Ivan V. White, Jr. was disbarred by consent by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Cited 6 timesPublished663 A.2d 517 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1995
The Florida Bar v. Abrams, 402 So.2d 1150, 1153 (Fla.1981) (per curiam). … (quoting United States v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedGlenbrook Road Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
605 A.2d 22 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1992
Rafferty v. … Hilton v. United States, 435 A.2d 383, 388 (D.C.1981). 17 The Board may not, however, prohibit cross-examination altogether, Washington v.
Cited 57 timesPublishedClark's Liquors, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
274 A.2d 414 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1971
It was clearly established in Wasserman v. Simonson, C.A. … Com’n v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDoherty v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
283 A.2d 206 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1971
Nevertheless the leading case in this jurisdiction, Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. v. … See Riley v. District of Col. Unemp. Comp. Bd., D.C.App., 278 A.2d 691 , 692 n. 2 (1971).
Cited 10 timesPublishedPoggi v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
453 A.2d 809 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1982
consideration of respondent’s renewed motion to dismiss made at oral argument herein, and of petitioner’s response thereto, and it appearing that the court does not have jurisdiction of this petition for review, Conner v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGreen v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
273 A.2d 479 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1971
NEBEKER, Associate Judge: This is a petition from a determination of the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board). … S.E.C. v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 94-95 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943). Reversed and remanded. 1 . The Board affirmed the appeals examiner’s findings. 2 . D.C.Code 1967, § 46-310 (b). 3 . Hickenbottom v.
Cited 9 timesPublished845 A.2d 519 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2004
Brown represented to the Board that he proposed to take these courses. 8 . … The Board found that Brown has admitted his misconduct in Bar Docket No. 273-91.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCompton v. District of Columbia Board of Psychology
858 A.2d 470 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2004
Co. v. … Guzman v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees v. American Federation of State
130 A.3d 355 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 2016
Fed. of Teachers, AFL-CIO v. Board of Educ. of the District of Columbia, 109 F.3d 774, 777 (D.C.Cir.1997). … V.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
140 A.3d 1144 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 2016
See Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 83 A.3d 739, 742, 747-49, 750-52 (D.C.2014). The CRB answered both questions in the affirmative. … See Brown, 83 A.3d at 745-46 . We affirm the Board’s decision.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna