Case law

Poyner v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

456 A.2d 1249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1983

See Conner v. District of Columbia Bureau of Motor Vehicle Services, 442 A.2d 957 (D.C.1982) (time period began to run when attorney, not party, was served); Valentine v. … See District of Columbia v. Tschudin, 390 A.2d 986 (D.C.1978); In re C.I.T. and C.M.T., 369 A.2d 171 (D.C.1977). In Valentine v.

Roberts v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

412 A.2d 47 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1980

In reviewing the Board’s interpretation, this court will give great weight to any reasonable construction of a regulatory statute adopted by an agency charged with enforcing the statute, Coakley v. … Given the humane purpose of the retirement laws, Hyde v. Tobriner, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 313, 329 F.2d 879, 881 (1964); Crawford v.

Henson v. United States

399 A.2d 16 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1979

In light of Brown’s unavailability, appellant requested that he be provided with a transcript of Brown’s statement before the Board. … [Alston v. United States, D.C.App., 383 A.2d 307, 315 (1978) (citations omitted).] Brown’s testimony before the Board was not given under oath or affirmation.

Tillery v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

912 A.2d 1169 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

Credit Union v. Cumis Ins. … Ass’n v.

Polen v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

466 A.2d 464 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1983

Perry v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 451 A.2d 88 , 89 n. 3 (D.C.1982), quoting Hawkins v. … In general, disability retirements cost the P & F program approximately 30 percent more than do optional retirements (66% percent v. 50 percent of base pay).

Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

273 A.2d 475 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1971

The Board affirmed the appeals examiner’s decision without modification. … Gregory v. Anderson, 14 Wis.2d 130 , 109 N.W.2d 675, 679 (1961). 10 . Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Indus. Comm’n., 22 Wis.2d 502 , 126 N.W.2d 6, 12 (1964). 11 . Woodridge Nursery School v.

Patrick Broom a/k/a Patrick Brown v. United States

118 A.3d 207 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2015

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 13-CF-1423 PATRICK BROOM A/K/A PATRICK BROWN, APPELLANT, V. … Brown, 632 N.E.2d 970, 971-73 (Ohio Ct.

McNeal v. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

488 A.2d 931 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1985

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74 , 58 S.Ct. 98 , 82 L.Ed. 57 (1937); American Postal Worker’s Union v. … Richardson v.

Wells v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

449 A.2d 1079 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1982

Coakley v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 370 A.2d 1345, 1349-50 (1977); Seabolt v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, supra at 910-11. Petitioner cites Torvik v. … In Seabolt v.

Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

377 A.2d 436 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1977

[Consolidated Edison v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938).] See Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, supra at 179. … Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516, 518 (1973).

Riley v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

278 A.2d 691 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1971

The Board insists that October 29, the date of mailing, controls. In District Unemployment Compensation Board v. Wm. Hahn & Co., 130 U.S.App. D.C. 254, 399 F.2d 987 (1968), the court was faced with an analogous problem. … See Woodridge Nursery School v. Jessup, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 199 (1970).

In re J. Scott Brown

80 A.3d 1043 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2013

PER CURIAM: The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that we disbar James Scott Brown because Mr. … The Board concluded that conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud is a crime of moral turpitude per se and recommended that we disbar Mr. Brown. Mr. Brown did not oppose the Board’s recommendation.

NATHALIA L. BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2016

BROWN, Petitioner, JUN - 9 2016 v. … BROWN, PETITIONER, V.

Malcolm Price, Inc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

350 A.2d 730 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1976

See Siaba-Fernandez v. Rosenberg, 302 F.2d 139 (9th Cir. 1962); Olinger v. Partridge, 196 F.2d 986 (9th Cir. 1952). … If the Board proposes to change the appeals examiner’s decision, the procedure set forth in Carey v. District Unemployment Compensation Bd., D.C.App., 304 A.2d 18 (1973), and Wallace v.

In Re Drew

693 A.2d 1127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1997

The Board also agrees that Respondent violated Rule 1.1(b) in connection with his representation of Brown. … Samuels v. United States, 435 A.2d 392, 395 (D.C.1981).” (Ibid). Bar Counsel also referred to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v.

McDuffie v. D.C. Board of Elections

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2022

McDuffie, the Board, and intervenor/challenger Bruce V. Spiva, was held on April 27, 2022. … See District of Columbia v.

Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses' Examining Board

459 A.2d 141 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1983

Russell v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 402 A.2d 1231, 1234 (D.C.1979). … Proctor v. District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 268 A.2d 267, 269 (D.C.1970).

Hill v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

279 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1971

Commenting on the above section of the Code in Woodridge Nursery School v. … As the Supreme Court said in United States v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.

Conrad v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2023

See, e.g., Compton v. D.C. … See, e.g., Haight v. D.C.

In Re Brown

617 A.2d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1992

During the remand hearing Brown equivocated about whether he intended to deceive the Virginia Board. … the Virginia Board.