Case law

Adams v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

414 A.2d 830 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1980

If the findings are supported, we may not reverse the Board, even though we “may have reached a contrary result based on an independent review of the record.” Washington Post Co. v. … See Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 379 A.2d at 697 .

Tiber Island Cooperative Homes, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

975 A.2d 186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 2009

Bowles v. … Economides v.

Jones v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

375 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1977

Lewis v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 330 A.2d 253 (1974); Perry v. … District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 316 A.2d 865 (1974); Schiffmann v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C. App., 302 A.2d 235 (1973); Johnson v.

Liberty v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

410 A.2d 191 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1979

Coakley v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 370 A.2d 1345, 1347-48 (1977); Schiffman v. … Id.; see Morgan, supra at 1325-26; Lewis v. Board of App. & Rev., D.C.App., 330 A.2d 253, 255-56 (1974); Johnson v.

Brown v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

700 A.2d 787 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1997

In re Vaughn v. Hadley Memorial Hosp., H & AS No. 86-204 at p. 7 (July 28, 1986). … See Petrilli v.

Torvik v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

406 A.2d 1264 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1979

This court in Jones v. … Consequently, the Board was in error in denying retirement to petitioner. The ruling in Jones, supra, relied on here, may appear to be contrary to the slightly earlier ruling in Coakley v. Police and Firemen’s Ret. & R.

Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

527 A.2d 313 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1987

Johnson v. Board of Appeals & Review, 282 A.2d 566, 570 (D.C.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1175 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); accord, Arellano v. … Upper Georgia Avenue Planning Committee v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 500 A.2d 987, 992 (D.C.1985) (citing cases); see Consolo v.

Proulx v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

430 A.2d 34 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1981

Liberty v. District of Columbia Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 191, 192 (1979) citing Morgan v. … [Seabolt v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 413 A.2d 908, 911 (1980), citing Jones v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 375 A.2d 1, 6 (1977).]

Nathalia L. Brown v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Potomac Electrical Power Company

83 A.3d 739 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 2014

If Brown‟s benefits therefore “remain[ed] suspended” the Board declared, then “the ALJ did not have authority to enter any award” in her favor. 12 See 7 DCMR § 258.11 (2013). 13 Brown v. … We therefore defer to the Board‟s interpretation. V.

Matheson v. Practical Nurses' Examining Board

195 A.2d 402 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1963

This is an appeal from a decision of the Practical Nurses’ Examining Board denying petitioner’s application for a license by waiver. 1 As in Corbett v. … Principal reliance is placed on Valentine v.

In Re McBride

602 A.2d 626 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1992

The Board first concluded that under 18 U.S.C. § 2 8 McBride had been “the party who aids or abets the offense [and therefore] ‘is guilty under the statute as a principal.’ ” Board Report at 11 (quoting United States v. … Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v.

Von Stauffenberg v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

269 A.2d 110 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1970

Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S. … Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548, 584 , 57 S.Ct. 883 , 81 L.Ed. 1279 (1937); Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619, 646 , 57 S.Ct. 904 , 81 L.Ed. 1307 (1937). See also United States v.

Szego v. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

528 A.2d 1233 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1987

Scott v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 447 A.2d 447, 449 (D.C.1982). … Proulx v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 430 A.2d 34, 35 (D.C.1981).

Hollar v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

317 A.2d 868 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1974

PAIR, Associate Judge: On this petition for review of a decision of the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board (the Board), 1 the sole question is whether petitioner was available for work during the period … A transcript of the proceedings was furnished to the Board and upon consideration thereof by an appeals examiner the determination of the Board’s claims deputy was, on August 13, 1973, affirmed.

Wells v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief Board

459 A.2d 136 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1983

Coakley v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 370 A.2d 1345, 1348-50 (D.C.1977); Seabolt v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, supra, 413 A.2d at 910-12 . … Petitioner cites Torvik v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, supra, and Jones v. Police and Firemen's Retirement and Relief Board, 375 A.2d 1 (D.C.1977), in support of his position.

Auger v. D.C. Board of Appeals & Review

477 A.2d 196 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1984

First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of County Commissioners, 264 U.S. 450 , 44 S.Ct. 385 , 68 L.Ed. 784 (1924) (waiver theory applicable when agency’s jurisdiction is not contested); 3 K. … District of Columbia v.

Smith v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

460 A.2d 997 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1983

Neumann Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Appeal and Review, 268 A.2d 605, 606 (D.C.1970). … See Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Novotny, 442 U.S. 366 , 99 S.Ct. 2345 , 60 L.Ed.2d 957 (1979); Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).

McMullen v. Police & Firefighter's Retirement & Relief Board

465 A.2d 364 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 1983

Kegley v. District of Columbia, 440 A.2d 1013, 1018 (D.C.1982). … United States v. Stokes, 365 A.2d 615, 618 (D.C.1976). The language of § 4-620(a) clearly supports the Board’s interpretation.

Carbon v. Physical Therapists Examining Board

242 A.2d 835 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1968

V), § 2-451(d). 7 . Hicks v. … V), § 2-451 (c); see Olsen v. District of Columbia Physical Therapists Examining Board, D.C.App., 227 A.2d 392 (1967). 9 . Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining Board, supra note 5, 219 A.2d at 848. 10 . Id.

Eden v. Abrams

259 A.2d 351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1969

However, when Abrams later resold the property to Esther Eden, nominee for appellants Sidney J. and Sarah Brown (hereinafter Brown), the deed was absolute, with no mention made of Hedin’s reservation of a right of occupancy … Hampton v. Mott Motors, Inc., D.C. Mun.App., 32 A.2d 247, 248 (1943). . This is not a ease for double rent under D.C.Code 1967, § 45-907.