Case law

Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining Board

219 A.2d 846 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1966

V, 1966). … Their questions, however, should not take the form of an examination, Sherman v. Physical Therapists Examining Board, D.C.App., 208 A.2d 728 (1965).

Darius Brown and Jamal Shepherd v. United States

89 A.3d 98 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 2014

In Riley v. … See United States v.

Holdings v. DC ABC Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2020

Cooper v. … Ass’ns, Inc. v.

Colvin v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

306 A.2d 662 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1973

See Riley v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 278 A.2d 691 , 692 n. 2 (1971). … See Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 273 A.2d 475 (1971). Affirmed.

Hansen v. Physical Therapists Examining Board

228 A.2d 497 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1967

Olsen v. District of Columbia Physical Therapists Examining Board, D.C.App., 227 A.2d 392 (decided March 20, 1967) ; Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining Board, D.C.App., 221 A.2d 712 (1966); Hlebanja v. … Physical Therapists Examining Board, D.C.App., 219 A.2d 848 (1966); Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining Board, D.C.App., 219 A.2d 846 (1966). See also, Culler v.

Budzanoski v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

326 A.2d 243 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1974

Hickenbottom v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 273 A.2d 475 (1971). … See also, Kartsonis v. DUCB, D.C.App., 289 A.2d 370 (1972); Green v. DUCB, D.C.App., 273 A.2d 479 (1971). . Fogle v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 197 Pa.Super. 18 , 176 A.2d 157 (1961). Hut see Sullivan v.

Bryan v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

342 A.2d 45 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1975

The United States Supreme Court in the case of Smoot Sand & Gravel Corporation v. … As we said in Hemenway v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.

Vedder v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

360 A.2d 485 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1976

PER CURIAM: This is a petition for review of a decision of the District Unemployment Compensation Board finding petitioner ineligible for benefits. We affirm. … The Board denied petitioner’s claim for his failure to meet requirement of D.C.

Hlebanja v. Physical Therapists Examining Board

219 A.2d 848 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1966

See Schramm v. Physical Therapists Examining Board of the District of Columbia, D.C.App., 219 A.2d 846 ; decided June 1, 1966. Affirmed. 1 . D.C.Code, 1961, § 2-458 (Supp. V, 1966). … Bernstein v.

Emma M. Govan v. Julie Ebner Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 28, 2020

Butler v. … Therefore, we reject appellee Brown’s request that we “take guidance” from Crafton v. Harris, 9 Tenn. App. 561 (Ct.

General Credit, Inc. v. Brown

141 A.2d 757 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 1958

Thereafter General Credit filed a motion for judgment n. o. v. which attacked the jury’s verdict on Mr. Brown’s counterclaim. … Brown had destroyed the original. Both parties stipulated to the use of a copy. 2 . Not a party to this suit. 3 . Certainly there was no such express provision. 4 . Lundberg v.

Culler v. Physical Therapists Examining Board

228 A.2d 495 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1967

V, 1966), petitioner applied for registration as a physical therapist in the District of Columbia without examination. … school of physical therapy. *497 ' [2] Although the Board accepted as a fact that petitioner did some physical therapy work in the District of Columbia, the record supports the Board’s finding that it was only incidental

Hemenway v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

326 A.2d 776 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1974

Petitioner appealed to the Board itself, which affirmed the examiner. … Accordingly the Board made no error in its final determination. Affirmed. . Act of Sept. 6, 1966, Pub.L. No. 89-554, 5 U.S.C. §§ 8501-8525, 80 Stat. 585 . .

Tiber Island Cooperative Homes, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

975 A.2d 186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 2009

Bowles v. … Economides v.

Salas v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

387 A.2d 1107 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1978

On December 3, the Board affirmed the decision of the appeals examiner. … We need not, however, reach this issue, for we think the Board’s ruling must be reversed on other grounds. In Christian v.

Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

370 A.2d 1345 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1977

Shay v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 334 A.2d 175 (1975); Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 (1973). … Lewis v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 330 A.2d 253 (1974); Johnson v.

Wood v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

334 A.2d 188 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1975

Doherty v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 283 A.2d 206 (1971). See also *189 Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. v. … Accordingly, the Board’s decision * is Affirmed. * Subsequent to the Board’s decision, agents of the Board sent petitioner two letters demanding a refund of some $1,177.00 for the amounts improperly paid for the weeks ending

Duncan v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

384 A.2d 645 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1978

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks review of an order of the District Unemployment Compensation Board (Board) denying her unemployment benefits on the ground that she was not “available” for work within the meaning of D.C.Code … [p]rovided, [t]hat failure to comply with this condition may be excused by the Board upon a showing of good cause for such failure. [Emphasis in original.] In Hill v.

Jones v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

375 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1977

Lewis v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 330 A.2d 253 (1974); Perry v. … District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 316 A.2d 865 (1974); Schiffmann v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C. App., 302 A.2d 235 (1973); Johnson v.

Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review

282 A.2d 566 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1971

This court’s decision in Matala v. Washington, D.C.App., 276 A.2d 126 (1971), does not sustain respondent’s position. … They rely particularly on Blohm v. Tobriner, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 2 , 350 F.2d 785 (1965), and Wingo v. Washington, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 410 , 395 F.2d 633 (1968).