Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
2.31s
Karr v. C. Dudley Brown & Associates, Inc.
567 A.2d 1306 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1989
In Remodeling Consultants, Inc. v. Builders Board, 19 Or.App. 794 , 528 P.2d 1373 (1974), for example, the Oregon Court of Appeals held that a self-styled “consultant” was subject to the state’s licensing law. … Similarly, in Bacigalupo v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBurch v. Board of Commissioners
191 A.2d 604 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1963
Part V, Traffic & Motor Vehicle Regulations of the District of Columbia. 2 . Cf. Kuhn v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 130, 135 , 183 F.2d 839, 844 (1950).
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 2017
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-AA-700 SYLVIA BROWN-CARSON, PETITIONER, V. … Payne v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 99 A.3d 665, 675-76 (D.C. 2014). 28 See Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIDEAL ELECTRONIC SEC. CO., INC. v. Brown
817 A.2d 806 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2003
See Goldsberry v. … .”); see also United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Brown
619 A.2d 1188 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1993
Hudson v. … Joseph v. Parekh, 351 A.2d 204, 205 (D.C.1976).
Cited 5 timesPublishedPalmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
287 A.2d 535 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1972
See, e. g., Puritan-Greenfield Improvement Ass’n v. Leo, supra note 10 , at 168-169; Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 852-853 (Mo.Ct.App.1964); Alumni Control Bd. etc. v. … See Village of Bronxville v. Francis, supra, note 21. 23 . Brown v. Beuc, supra note 12 , 384 S.W.2d at 852 . 24 . 165 Augusta Street v. Collins, supra note 16 , 87 A.2d at 891 . See Clouser v.
Cited 62 timesPublishedJohnson v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
408 A.2d 79 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1979
See Wallace v. Sullivan, Tenn., 561 S.W.2d 452, 454 (1978); Murphy v. … District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 390 A.2d 973, 975 (1978) (quoting Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
294 A.2d 177 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 1972
V, 1972). … Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App. 289 A.2d 885 (1972). Since the Board has complied with our directive, we grant the Board’s motion to reinstate its order. 2 .
Cited 29 timesPublishedCarter v. District of Columbia
980 A.2d 1217 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 2009
See, e.g., Board, of Trs. of Univ. of District of Columbia v. DiSalvo, 974 A.2d 868, 870 (D.C.2009). 2 . See D.C.Code§ 1-608.01 (2001). 3 . See id. §§ 1-609.51 to -609.58 (2001). 4 . … ."); see also Brown, 425 A.2d at 1311 . 14 . Brown, 425 A.2d at 1312 ; accord, Anderson v. U.S. Safe Deposit Co., 552 A.2d 859, 860 (D.C.1989). 15 .
Cited 59 timesPublishedWallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
289 A.2d 885 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1972
Wood-ridge Nursery School v. Jessup, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 199 (1970). … Hill v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 279 A.2d 501, 502 (1971).
Cited 16 timesPublishedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 2025
Register makes this case quite unlike Lawrence v. D.C. Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 611 A.2d 529 (D.C. 1992), a case on which the Board relies. … The Board is “the gatekeeper for the initiative process.” Marijuana Pol’y Project v. United States, 304 F.3d 82, 84 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
Cited 0 timesPublishedGaskins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
315 A.2d 567 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1974
Despite these understandable reasons, the Board affirmed the Appeals Examiner’s decision on February 20, 1973. In so doing the Board made a twofold finding. … Nevertheless, he asserts his appeal was timely filed and relies upon this court’s holding in Riley v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 278 A.2d 691 (1971).
Cited 13 timesPublishedHawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
381 A.2d 619 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1977
. § 301.2(a); Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 346 A.2d 252, 255 (1975), citing Simmons v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 292 A.2d 797, 800 (1972). … Code 1973, § 1-1510(3)(E); Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 694 at 696 (1977); Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, supra at 255; Wallace v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedLandahl, Brown & Weed, Associates, Inc. v. Houston
404 A.2d 934 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1979
Compare D.C.Code, 1973, § 16-573 with First National Realty Co. v. Weathers, D.C.MunApp., 154 A.2d 548, 550 (1959). Accordingly, the judgment is Affirmed. Throughout, “appellee" refers to the garnishee.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHill v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
302 A.2d 226 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1973
V, 1972). … Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 160 A. 2d 100, 103 (1960). See Shawley v. Industrial Commission, 16 Wis.2d 535 , 114 N.W.2d 872, 875-876 (1962).
Cited 17 timesPublishedGreen v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
346 A.2d 252 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1975
We hold that a finding of misconduct by the Board pursuant to D.C.Code 1973, § 46-310(b) must be based fundamentally on the reasons specified by the employer for the discharge. 7 Hawkins v. … Coulter v. Commonwealth, Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev., 16 Pa.Cmwlth. 462 , 332 A.2d 876 (1975) ; D.C.Code 1973, § 1-1510; see also Wallace v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedWorrell v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
382 A.2d 1036 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1978
In Gaskins v. … Gaskins v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedJohnson v. Board of Commissioners
116 A.2d 161 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1955
Petitioner seeks a review of an order of the Board of Revocation and Review of Hackers’ Identification Licenses. 1 Respondent has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The motion must be granted. … See Silver v. McCamey, D.C.Cir., 221 F.2d 873 . Appeal dismissed. . Code 1951, Supp. III, 47-2331.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSimmons v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
292 A.2d 797 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1972
Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 160 A.2d 100, 103 (1960). See Shawley v. Industrial Commission, 16 Wis.2d 535 , 114 N.W.2d 872, 875-876 (1962). … which may then be treated by the Board in conformity with our decision in Wallace v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedWilliams v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
383 A.2d 345 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1978
See, e. g., Hubbard v. Perlie, 25 App.D.C. 477 (1905); Mangus v. Miller, 35 Colo.App. 335 , 535 P.2d 219 (1975); Cohen v. Peoples, 140 Ind.App. 353 , 220 N.E.2d 665 (1966). … Beville v. Commonwealth Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 15 Pa.
Cited 20 timesPublished
Ask Donna