Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

2.31s

  • Karr v. C. Dudley Brown & Associates, Inc.

    567 A.2d 1306 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1989

    In Remodeling Consultants, Inc. v. Builders Board, 19 Or.App. 794 , 528 P.2d 1373 (1974), for example, the Oregon Court of Appeals held that a self-styled “consultant” was subject to the state’s licensing law. … Similarly, in Bacigalupo v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Burch v. Board of Commissioners

    191 A.2d 604 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1963

    Part V, Traffic & Motor Vehicle Regulations of the District of Columbia. 2 . Cf. Kuhn v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 130, 135 , 183 F.2d 839, 844 (1950).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sylvia Brown-Cartson v. DOES

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 2017

    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-AA-700 SYLVIA BROWN-CARSON, PETITIONER, V. … Payne v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 99 A.3d 665, 675-76 (D.C. 2014). 28 See Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • IDEAL ELECTRONIC SEC. CO., INC. v. Brown

    817 A.2d 806 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2003

    See Goldsberry v. … .”); see also United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Brown

    619 A.2d 1188 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1993

    Hudson v. … Joseph v. Parekh, 351 A.2d 204, 205 (D.C.1976).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

    287 A.2d 535 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1972

    See, e. g., Puritan-Greenfield Improvement Ass’n v. Leo, supra note 10 , at 168-169; Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 852-853 (Mo.Ct.App.1964); Alumni Control Bd. etc. v. … See Village of Bronxville v. Francis, supra, note 21. 23 . Brown v. Beuc, supra note 12 , 384 S.W.2d at 852 . 24 . 165 Augusta Street v. Collins, supra note 16 , 87 A.2d at 891 . See Clouser v.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    408 A.2d 79 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1979

    See Wallace v. Sullivan, Tenn., 561 S.W.2d 452, 454 (1978); Murphy v. … District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 390 A.2d 973, 975 (1978) (quoting Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    294 A.2d 177 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 26, 1972

    V, 1972). … Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App. 289 A.2d 885 (1972). Since the Board has complied with our directive, we grant the Board’s motion to reinstate its order. 2 .

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Carter v. District of Columbia

    980 A.2d 1217 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 2009

    See, e.g., Board, of Trs. of Univ. of District of Columbia v. DiSalvo, 974 A.2d 868, 870 (D.C.2009). 2 . See D.C.Code§ 1-608.01 (2001). 3 . See id. §§ 1-609.51 to -609.58 (2001). 4 . … ."); see also Brown, 425 A.2d at 1311 . 14 . Brown, 425 A.2d at 1312 ; accord, Anderson v. U.S. Safe Deposit Co., 552 A.2d 859, 860 (D.C.1989). 15 .

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    289 A.2d 885 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1972

    Wood-ridge Nursery School v. Jessup, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 199 (1970). … Hill v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 279 A.2d 501, 502 (1971).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Bowser

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 2025

    Register makes this case quite unlike Lawrence v. D.C. Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 611 A.2d 529 (D.C. 1992), a case on which the Board relies. … The Board is “the gatekeeper for the initiative process.” Marijuana Pol’y Project v. United States, 304 F.3d 82, 84 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gaskins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    315 A.2d 567 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1974

    Despite these understandable reasons, the Board affirmed the Appeals Examiner’s decision on February 20, 1973. In so doing the Board made a twofold finding. … Nevertheless, he asserts his appeal was timely filed and relies upon this court’s holding in Riley v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 278 A.2d 691 (1971).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    381 A.2d 619 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1977

    . § 301.2(a); Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 346 A.2d 252, 255 (1975), citing Simmons v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 292 A.2d 797, 800 (1972). … Code 1973, § 1-1510(3)(E); Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 694 at 696 (1977); Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, supra at 255; Wallace v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Landahl, Brown & Weed, Associates, Inc. v. Houston

    404 A.2d 934 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1979

    Compare D.C.Code, 1973, § 16-573 with First National Realty Co. v. Weathers, D.C.MunApp., 154 A.2d 548, 550 (1959). Accordingly, the judgment is Affirmed. Throughout, “appellee" refers to the garnishee.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hill v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    302 A.2d 226 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1973

    V, 1972). … Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 160 A. 2d 100, 103 (1960). See Shawley v. Industrial Commission, 16 Wis.2d 535 , 114 N.W.2d 872, 875-876 (1962).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    346 A.2d 252 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1975

    We hold that a finding of misconduct by the Board pursuant to D.C.Code 1973, § 46-310(b) must be based fundamentally on the reasons specified by the employer for the discharge. 7 Hawkins v. … Coulter v. Commonwealth, Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev., 16 Pa.Cmwlth. 462 , 332 A.2d 876 (1975) ; D.C.Code 1973, § 1-1510; see also Wallace v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Worrell v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    382 A.2d 1036 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1978

    In Gaskins v. … Gaskins v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Board of Commissioners

    116 A.2d 161 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1955

    Petitioner seeks a review of an order of the Board of Revocation and Review of Hackers’ Identification Licenses. 1 Respondent has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The motion must be granted. … See Silver v. McCamey, D.C.Cir., 221 F.2d 873 . Appeal dismissed. . Code 1951, Supp. III, 47-2331.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Simmons v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    292 A.2d 797 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1972

    Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 160 A.2d 100, 103 (1960). See Shawley v. Industrial Commission, 16 Wis.2d 535 , 114 N.W.2d 872, 875-876 (1962). … which may then be treated by the Board in conformity with our decision in Wallace v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Williams v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    383 A.2d 345 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1978

    See, e. g., Hubbard v. Perlie, 25 App.D.C. 477 (1905); Mangus v. Miller, 35 Colo.App. 335 , 535 P.2d 219 (1975); Cohen v. Peoples, 140 Ind.App. 353 , 220 N.E.2d 665 (1966). … Beville v. Commonwealth Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 15 Pa.

    Cited 20 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.