Case law

Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

717 A.2d 309 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1998

Co. v. … . *317 Schleft v. Board of Educ. of the Los Alamos Public Schools, 109 N.M. 271 , 784 P.2d 1014, 1017-18 (1989); Sutton v. Monongahela Power Co., 151 W.Va. 961 , 158 S.E.2d 98, 104 (1967); but cf. Hayes v.

Williams v. United States

205 A.3d 837 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2019

Accord Carter v. … See Swarthout v.

Emmco Insurance Company v. Brown

178 A.2d 429 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1962

In United States v. … David v. Nemerofsky, D.C.Mun.App., 41 A.2d 838 . 6 . Litchfield Admr. v. Crane Admr., supra, note 5. 7 . In Llanes v.

Afolabi-Brown v. United States

12 A.3d 1171 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2011

12 A.3d 1171 (2011) AFOLABI-BROWN v. U.S. Nos. 06-CF-504, 07-CO-668. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. January 31, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Young & Simon, Inc. v. Brown

387 A.2d 724 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1978

The case stems from Brown v. Young, D.C.App., 364 A.2d 1171 (1976). We there affirmed a judgment of possession which had been obtained by the landlord in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the trial court. … In Tuteur v.

Brown v. Greenwich Lounge, Incorporated

225 A.2d 656 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1967

Rowe v. Nolan Finance Co., 79 U.S.App.D.C. 35 , 142 F.2d 93 (1944). See also, Shulman v. Shulman, D.C.Mun.App., 86 A.2d 527 (1952); Villacres v. Haddad, D.C.Mun.App., 184 A.2d 634 (1962). … Thermo-Stitch, Inc. v. Chemi-Cord Processing Corp., 294 F.2d 486, 491 (5th Cir. 1961). The foregoing quotation was cited with approval in Dairy Queen, Inc. v.

Proctor v. Hackers' Board

268 A.2d 267 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1970

Ritter v. City of Pontiac, 276 Mich. 416 , 267 N.W. 641, 643 (1936). See Czarra v. … Doubt about the validity of delegating to the Hackers’ Board authority to enforce this broadly-worded statute has previously been expressed. Frazier v. Silver, 186 F.Supp. 625 (D.D.C.1960). Contra, Green v.

Szymkowicz v. President and Directors of the College of Georgetown University

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2025

Hedgepeth v. … Ass’n v. D.C.

Brown v. District of Columbia

170 A.2d 925 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 19, 1961

But, as we have pointed out in Glenn v. Commissioners of District of Columbia, D. C.Mun.App., 146 A.2d 575, 576 , such a suspension “is not to punish offending drivers but to protect the public.” … See Commonwealth v. Ungar, 190 Pa.Super. 43 , 151 A.2d 782 . It is not unreasonable to require that one whose permit has been lawfully suspended shall take some affirmative action to effect its restoration.

District of Columbia v. Brown

739 A.2d 832 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1999

Brown within 30 days of the decision, the OEA Board issued an October 5, 1993 order directing DCPS to submit a written statement concerning the status of the school system’s compliance with the OEA order. … The Board of OEA concluded *838 in Galbreith v. D.C. Public Schools, OEA Dkt No. 2401-0290-81 (1989) that: “[T]he Home Rule Act only protects personnel benefits Employee had on March 2, 1979.

Brown v. District of Columbia

727 A.2d 865 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1999

See District of Columbia v. Brown, 124 Daily Wash. L. Rptr. 1965 (D.C.Super.Ct. Aug. 27, 1996). … A regulation authorized the Nurses’ Examining Board to issue a license “[u]pon showing of cause satisfactory to it....” Id. (citing 5 DD DCRR § 60.4) (emphasis added).

Freeman v. United States

912 A.2d 1213 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

Brown v. United States, 619 A.2d 1180, 1182 (D.C.1992) (citing cases). … Anderson v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

252 A.2d 513 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1969

Creed v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 156 A.2d 676 (1959). Cf. White v. Ragen, 324 U.S. 760, 763-764 , 65 S.Ct. 978 , 89 L.Ed. 1348 (1945). … Brown v. Southall Realty Company, D.C.App., 237 A.2d 834, 837 (1968). Reversed and remanded with instructions for a new trial. 1 . District of Columbia Housing Regulations, § 2407 (1955). 2 .

Tom Brown & Co. v. Francis

608 A.2d 148 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1992

. v. … Briggs Co. v.

Brown v. M Street Five, LLC

56 A.3d 765 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 2012

Co. v. … Co. v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

153 A.2d 658 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1959

Joseph A. Brown v. United States

181 A.3d 164 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2018

See, e.g. , White v. … Simply put, in order for Brown's claim to succeed, the court would have to engage in pure speculation. 5 Curry v. United States , 498 A.2d 534 , 540 (D.C. 1985) (citing Williams v.

Brown, Manning & Co. v. Boker

20 D.C. 99 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1891

Justice Hag-nrr delivered the opinion of the Court: This is a bill in equity to enforce mechanics’ liens filed by Brown the general contractor, and Manning & Whiting, subcontractors, for work claimed to have been done on … request of the defendant, and' who found fauF with many features in the execution of the work. *102 The case was carefully examined below and the court made a decree reducing by a sum of ninety odd dollars the claim of Brown

Brown v. District of Columbia

14 D.C. 502 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1884

“Board or other foundation made water-proof; square blocks in transverse rows, with spacing strips between to make a groove, the groove to be filled with broken stone, gravel and tar, or other like materials.”

Brown v. National Academy of Sciences

844 A.2d 1113 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2004

Brown on both aspects of those seven counts. Our de novo review of the record, see Doe v. … In Hall v.