Case law

In Re Shaw

775 A.2d 1123 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 2001

See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. … He argues that under Maryland law Kaiser in fact had no valid claim to the settlement funds, citing Riemer v. Columbia Med., 358 Md. 222 , 747 A.2d 677 (2000).

Womack v. United States

673 A.2d 603 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1996

Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991); Lawrence v. United States, 566 A.2d 57, 60 (D.C.1989). We must defer to the trial judge’s findings of eviden-tiary fact. Lawrence, supra, 566 A.2d at 60 . … See Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1020 . B. Reasonableness, Proportionality, and the Fourth Amendment.

Fairman v. District of Columbia

934 A.2d 438 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2007

Corp. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n, 343 U.S.App. … Lopata, supra, 735 A.2d at 937 (quoting Nghiem v.

District of Columbia v. Casino Associates, Ltd.

684 A.2d 322 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1996

See also Lake Worth Towers, Inc. v. … See also The Washington Post Co. v.

In Re Squillacote

790 A.2d 514 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2002

Indictment, United States v. Clark, Crim. No. 97-948-M (E.D.Va.). … In United States v.

In Re Huber

708 A.2d 259 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1998

See, e.g., Bingham v. Goldberg, Marchesano, Kohlman, Inc., 637 A.2d 81 , 95 n. 34 (D.C.1994). … See In re Gorfkle, 444 A.2d 934, 939-40 (D.C.1982); see also Zapata v. Zapata, 499 A.2d 905, 908 (D.C. 1985). 6 .

J.O. v. O.E.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 2014

Hosp. v. … This court‘s ―standard of review mirrors that which the Board is bound to apply‖ when the Board reviews an ALJ‘s compensation order. Id. at 1276 (citing Marriott Int’l v.

Matter of Laurins

576 A.2d 1351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1990

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Bar Docket No. 177-89 In the Matter of: Aleksandrs V. … United States v. Laurins, 857 F.2d 529, 536-37 (9th Cir.1988). 2 .

Lewis v. Rent-A-Crane, Inc.

315 A.2d 171 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1974

Plaintiff cites the cases of Greet v. Otis Elevator Co., D.C.App., 187 A.2d 896 (1963), and Washington Sheraton Corp. v. … See Alley v. Texas Electric Service Co., 134 S.W.2d 762, 769 (Tex.Ct.Civ.App.1939), and Longoria v. Violet Gin Co., 309 S.W.2d 484 (Tex.Ct.Civ.App.1958).

In Re Miller

883 A.2d 105 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2005

See Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Miller, Misc. Docket AG No. 13 (September Term 2004). … Bar Counsel filed a certified copy of the *106 Maryland reprimand order with this court, and we referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to either recommend whether identical, greater or lesser

Money v. Cullinane

392 A.2d 998 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1978

V 1975). … [Wells v. District of Columbia Board of Education, D.C.App., 386 A.2d 703, 706 (1978).]

In Re Rogers

902 A.2d 103 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2006

See Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 50 , 111 S.Ct. 2123 , 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991). … Bar Board of *105 Governors in 1985.

Angarano v. United States

329 A.2d 453 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1974

Action, 217 So.2d 323 (Fla.1969) (Should the Board of Governors on behalf of the Bar advocate electoral support for revised Constitution); Sams v. Olah, supra (Whether the State Bar Act was constitutional); Button v. … Accord, United States v. Brown, 155 U.S. App.D.C. 177, 179, 476 F.2d 933, 935 (1973); United States v. Thompson, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 347, 348 , 475 F.2d 931, 932 (1973). See also Marshall v.

Grillo v. National Bank of Washington

540 A.2d 743 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1988

The Board of Directors *746 approved this plan and did not later disavow the general desirability of safety glass. … Fed.R.Evid. 407 (emphasis supplied); see also Boeing Airplane Co. v. Brown, 291 F.2d 310 (9th Cir.1961).

In Re Evans

578 A.2d 1141 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1990

Citizens Association of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission, 402 A.2d 36, 41 (D.C.App.1979). … See Attorney Grievance Commission v. Abb, 306 Md. 636 , 510 A.2d 1087, 1090-1091 (1986); In re Hudock, 544 A.2d 707 (D.C.App.1988).

Dockery v. United States

853 A.2d 687 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 2004

Dockery about wooden boards that were attached to a sliding glass window. Mr. Dockery explained that the boards were for his protection because someone had tried to shoot him. Mr. … Brown v. United States, 244 A.2d 487, 489 (D.C.1968) (citation omitted).

Zoob v. Jordan

841 A.2d 761 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2004

Smith v. Acorn, 32 A.2d 252 (D.C.1943). Delivery is evidenced by acts or words or both. Ratsch v. Rengel, 180 Md. 196 , 23 A.2d 680 (1942). … Duggan v. Keto, 554 A.2d 1126, 1135-1136 (D.C.1989).

In re Rehberger

891 A.2d 249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2006

See Rehberger v. Georgia, 269 Ga. 576 , 502 S.E.2d 222, 223 (1998) (Rehberger I). Under Georgia law, “all felonies are crimes involving moral turpitude.” Id. … See Rehberger v. Georgia, 235 Ga. App. 827 , 510 S.E.2d 594 (1998) (Rehberger II). 4 Upon receiving a certified copy of the order of the Supreme Court of Georgia disbarring Mr.

In re L.R.

640 A.2d 697 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1994

See, e.g., Shepard v. … See Willcher v. United States, 408 A.2d 67 (D.C.1979) (Willcher I); Gregory v. United States, 393 A.2d 132 (D.C.1978). . Cf.

In Re Coates

855 A.2d 1116 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2004

Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Coates, 376 Md. 699 , 831 A.2d 1042 (2003). This suspension was the result of respondent’s misconduct in two cases. … Respondent did not participate in the proceedings before the Board and has not filed any exceptions in this court to the Board’s recommendation. *1117 In light of the heightened deference we give the Board’s recommendation