Case law

Brown v. United States

518 A.2d 415 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1986

In Moore v. … He asserts his counsel failed to object to questions the prosecutor asked William Brown, appellant’s brother. The prosecutor asked Brown whether he was on drugs during the trial.

Brown v. United States

343 A.2d 48 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1975

United States v. Bland, supra 153 U.S.App. … The Fourth Circuit in Cox v.

Close It! Title Services, Inc. v. Nadel

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2021

Corp. v. … Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C. 1978)”).  17 not to retract the statements.

Close It! Title Services, Inc. v. Nadel

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2021

Corp. v. … Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C. 1978)”).  17 not to retract the statements.

Brown v. Southall Realty Company

237 A.2d 834 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1968

Brown, for nonpayment of rent. The parties stipulated, at the time of trial, that the rent was in the arrears in the amount of $230.00. Mrs. … Edwards v. Habib, D.C.App., 227 A.2d 388 (1967) ; Bess v. David, D.C.Mun. App., 140 A.2d 316 (1958); David v. Nemerofsky, D.C.Mun.App., 41 A.2d 838 (1945). 2 . Note in Bess v.

Brown v. United States

278 A.2d 462 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1971

Regulations. 4 See and compare United States v. Frye, D.C.App., 271 A.2d 788 (1970); United States v. Dowling, D.C.App., 271 A.2d 406 (1970). … See United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863 (2d Cir. 1965). Cf. Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v.

Otterback v. Brown

9 D.C. 541 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1876

BROWN. “MARSHALL BROWN.” This note was assigned by its payee to Philip Otterbach, without recourse. Interest was paid upon the note down to and including July 16,1861. … Brown’s instructions.

Donald Brown v. United States

97 A.3d 92 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2014

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 12-CF-803 DONALD BROWN, APPELLANT, V. … Tuckson v.

United States v. Brown

708 A.2d 637 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1998

See Spinner v. … Insofar as Arkansas v.

Spofford v. Brown

8 D.C. 223 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1873

It is now settled that if a party takes a negotiable instrument for a v aluable consideration, before the same is due, and without notice of any equities existing between the original parties, his title is good, and any defense

Brown v. United States

718 A.2d 95 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 1998

Therefore, Brown maintains, this case is distinguishable from Grant v. … We relied, in part, on Arizona v.

Deener v. Brown

8 D.C. 350 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1874

Brown, and the indorser, Jerome Browne, jr., united as defendants, as permitted by our laws. The check is dated 24th July, 1871, is drawn for $100, and payable to Jerome Browne or bearer. … The payee, Jerome Browne, makes *354 no defense; but the drawer, Wilson E.

Brown v. United States

555 A.2d 1034 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1989

Graves v. United States, 150 U.S. 118, 121 , 14 S.Ct. 40, 41 , 37 L.Ed. 1021 (1893). … Shelton v. United States, 388 A.2d 859, 863 (D.C. 1978).

Brown v. McLean

16 D.C. 559 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1887

Brown v. United States

35 App. D.C. 548 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1910

It is recited, also, “that *552 no threats were made nor inducements offered to Brown.” … State v. Brown (1794) 2 N. C. (1 Hayw.). 100, 1 Am. Dec. 548 .

Hutchinson v. Brown

19 D.C. 136 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1890

Brown, acting for the defendant, S. P. … Brown’s benefit, they must return the verdict for the defendant.”

Brown v. Wygant

17 D.C. 447 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1888

Brown v. United States

518 A.2d 446 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1986

United States, 466 A.2d 452 (D.C.1983); (2) attempted housebreaking, Hampton v. United States, 340 A.2d 813 (D.C.1975); (3) carrying a pistol without a license, Williams v. … Hammill v.

Ambrose v. Brown

42 App. D.C. 25 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1914

E. 317 ; Manker v. Phoenix Loan Asso. 124 Iowa, 341, 343 , 100 N. W. 38 ; Murray v. Etchepare, 132 Cal. 286, 288 , 64 Pac. 282 ; Mulcahey v. Strauss, 151 Ill. 70, 80 , 37 N. E. 702 ; American Steel & Wire Co. v. … Ratcliff v. Adler, 71 Ark. 269, 271 , 72 S. W. 896 ; Jones v. Stewart, — Tenn. —, 61 S. W. 105 , 107; Mavor v. Northern Trust Co. 93 Ill. App. 314, 319 ; Fox River Paper Co. v. Western Envelope Co. 109 Ill.

Brown v. District of Columbia

304 A.2d 292 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1973