Case law

In Re De Maio

893 A.2d 583 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 2006

We adopt the Board’s recommendation. I. … Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. DeMaio, 379 Md. 571 , 842 A.2d 802 (2004). II.

In Re Abrams

689 A.2d 6 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1997

In Scott v. … In Boyd v.

4934, Inc. v. Washington

375 A.2d 20 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1977

Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad, 420 U.S. 546 , 95 S.Ct. 1239 , 43 L.Ed.2d 448 (1975); the moviemaker, Kingsley Pictures Corp. v. … Compare Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973), with Paris Adult Theatre I. v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 , 93 S.Ct. 2628 , 37 L.Ed.2d 446 (1973), and United States v. 12 200-Ft.

Harris v. Cafritz Memorial Hospital

364 A.2d 135 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1976

Lathon v. Hadley Memorial Hospital, D.C.App., 250 A.2d 548, 549 (1969); Burke v. Washington Hospital Center, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 254 , 475 F.2d 364, 365 (1973); Brown v. … See also Haven v. Randolph, supra; Brown v. Keaveny, supra; Rodgers v. Lawson, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 281 , 170 F.2d 157 (1948). 5 .

Ware v. United States

672 A.2d 557 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1996

Johnson, supra, 540 A.2d at 1091 ; see Alabama v. White, supra, 496 U.S. at 332 , 110 S.Ct. at 2417 (upholding Terry stop when “significant aspects of the [anonymous tip] were verified”); Brown v. … See Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1016 (“an anonymous telephone tip is of the “weakest reliability’ ”); Lawson v.

Goggins v. Hoddes

265 A.2d 302 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1970

PER CURIAM: Appellant complained in the trial court that she was libelled when her employer filed an allegedly false report with the District Unemployment Compensation Board (hereinafter the Board) charging her with dishonesty … Simpson v. Oil Transfer Corporation, 75 F.Supp. 819 (N.D.N.Y.1948); Breuer v. Bo-Craft Enterprises, 8 Misc.2d 736 , 170 N.Y.S.2d 631 (1957); Stafney v.

In Re Harper

785 A.2d 311 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 2001

Accepting it would make of the Board proceedings a sort of “ ‘tryout on the road,’ ” Wainwright v. … the Board.

Matter of Anderson

474 A.2d 145 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1984

The suspension was based on Respondent’s guilty plea to the crime of false pretenses 1 , District of Columbia Code § 22-1301 2 , in United States of America v. Floyd W. Anderson, Criminal No. 81-00394 (DCCA 1982). … Upon notice, Respondent has not filed any pleadings with the Board.

Lennon v. United States

736 A.2d 208 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1999

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); accord, Byrd v. United States, 598 A.2d 386, 388-389 (D.C.1991) (en banc). … District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 642 A.2d 125, 128 (D.C.1994) (citing cases).

In re Washington

541 A.2d 1276 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 1988

Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir.1985); United States v. Spaar, 748 F.2d 1249 (8th Cir.1984). These cases are distinguishable on their facts. … . *1277 None of the facts found by the Board is contested by respondent, who filed no brief either with the Board or with us.

District of Columbia Department of Public Works v. Colbert

874 A.2d 353 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 2005

District of Columbia v. King, 766 A.2d 38, 44 (D.C.2001) (quoting Office of D.C. Controller v. Frost, 638 A.2d 657, 660 (D.C.1994)). … Co. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Services, 498 A.2d 563, 565 (D.C.1985) (citing Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 539-40 , 79 S.Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959); Dankman v.

In Re Mendes

598 A.2d 168 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1991

PER CURIAM: The District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) recommends disbarment of respondent Fortunato Mendes pursuant to D.C.Code § 11-2503(a) (1989 Repl.). … See Mendes v. United States, 595 A.2d 972 (D.C.1991).

Feaster v. Vance

832 A.2d 1277 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 2003

In United States v. … See International Tours & Travel, Inc. v.

Matter of Velasquez

507 A.2d 145 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1986

The facts are fully set forth in Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. … Velasquez, 301 Md. 450 , 483 A.2d 354 (1984), and in the attached Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) dated April 15, 1985.

In re Murdter

131 A.3d 355 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 2016

XI, § 9(h)(1); Board Rule 13.7. … BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY v By: /TRB/ Thomas R. Bundy, III Dated: February 24, 2015 All members of the Board concur in this Report and Recommendation, except Jason E.

Knott v. Jackson

31 A.2d 662 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1942

In Brown v. Slocum the question now before us was not involved. … Later in Von Rosen v. Dean, 59 App.D.C. 359 , 41 F.2d 982, 983 , the court paraphrased its language in Brown v.

Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

766 A.2d 974 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2001

In Simmons v. District of Columbia Armory Bd., 656 A.2d 1155 (D.C.1995) (per curiam), the plaintiff purported to bring an action against the District of Columbia Armory Board. … As with the Housing Authority in Braxton [v. Nat’l Capital Rous. Awth., 396 A.2d 215, 217 (D.C.1978) ], Congress has not authorized the Armory Board to be sued. Id. at 1157.

Norman v. United States

20 App. D.C. 494 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1902

, wilfully, and with malice aforethought did kill and murder the said Annie Brown. … Coffin v. United States, 162 U. S. 664 . Moreover, the instruction numbered three was simply a variation in language, and not in substance, of the instructions numbered one and two granted on behalf of the defendant.

In Re Abrams

662 A.2d 867 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1995

See also Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591, 599 , 16 S.Ct. 644, 647 , 40 L.Ed. 819 (1896) (the recipient of a pardon "stands with respect to such offence as if it had never been committed”); Armstrong v. … See Lee v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review, 423 A.2d 210 , 216 n. 13 (D.C.1980). 27 . An early federal decision anticipated Williston's position.

Smith v. United States

561 A.2d 468 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1989

Streater v. United States, 478 A.2d 1055, 1058 (D.C.1984). We therefore may review his claim only for plain error. See Brown v. United States, 289 A.2d 891, 893 (D.C.1972). … See Dumas v.