Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,092 results
1.90s
460 A.2d 982 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1983
Attorney Griev *984 ance Comm’n v. Goldberg, 292 Md. 650 , 441 A.2d 338 (1982). … District of Columbia v. Smith, 329 A.2d 128, 130 (D.C.1974) (citation omitted); accord, e.g., United States v.
Cited 86 timesPublishedUNITED STATES v. DAVID D. LEWIS
147 A.3d 236 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 2016
At the time Officer Brown arrived, Ms. Gibbs was outside the vehicle, saying that she needed to go to the bathroom. Officer Brown told Ms. Gibbs that she could not leave. … According to Officer Brown, Ms. Gibbs was not under arrest at the time the search of the car began. Once Officer Brown found the gun, she placed Ms. Gibbs in handcuffs.
Cited 19 timesPublished448 A.2d 267 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 1982
Brown, - U.S.App.D.C. -, -, 671 F.2d 585, 587 (1982) (search is valid if “undertaken as an integral part of lawful custodial arrest process”). 4 . See Price v. … Davis, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 400, 401 , 458 F.2d 819, 820 (1972) (small brown package). 5 . The cases relied on by the trial court lacked a combination of factors. See Thomas v.
Cited 12 timesPublished779 A.2d 926 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 2001
Braddock v. Smith, 711 A.2d 835, 840 (D.C.1998) (quoting Macauley v. District of Columbia Taxicab Comm’n, 623 A.2d 1207, 1209 (D.C.1993)). … Partnership, 630 A.2d 174, 182 (D.C.1993) (quoting Younger v. Smith, 30 Cal.App.3d 138, 153 , 106 Cal.Rptr, 225 (1973)); see also Smith v.
Cited 5 timesPublished629 A.2d 555 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1993
Area Transit Auth. v. Brown, 619 A.2d 1188 , 1189 n. 3 (D.C.1993); Larry M. Rosen & Associates, Inc. v. Hurwitz, 465 A.2d 1114, 1118-19 (D.C.1983); Firestone v. Harris, 414 A.2d 526, 528 (D.C.1980); Hudson v. … See Miner v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedRobinson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
676 A.2d 471 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 23, 1996
WMATA v. O’Neill, 633 A.2d 834, 841 (D.C.1993) (quoting McKethean v. WMATA 588 A.2d 708, 714 (D.C.1991)). … United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublished860 A.2d 836 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 2004
dishonesty, conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, false representation of material facts, and failing to make timely response to demands for information from Maryland Bar Counsel. 1 See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. … XI, § 11(d) and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”).
Cited 10 timesPublished674 A.2d 899 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1996
Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Andresen, 281 Md. 152 , 389 A.2d 159 , 161 (1977); In re Crooks, 51 Cal.3d 1090 , 275 Cal.Rptr. 420, 427 , 800 P.2d 898, 905 (1990) (citing Breed v. … Finally, respondent argues that the excessive fines clause is applicable to civil sanctions, relying upon Austin v.
Cited 8 timesPublished642 A.2d 1327 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1994
NEWMAN, Senior Judge: The Board on Professional Responsibility Board (Board or BPR) concluded that Fowler violated DR 7-101(A)(l) (intentionally failing to seek the lawful objectives of a client), and DR 9-103(B)(4) (failing … However, see Johnson v. United States, 398 A.2d 354, 364 (D.C.1979) (exercise of discretion must be on principled basis). 5 . This suspension shall become effective thirty days from the date of this opinion.
Cited 22 timesPublished29 A.3d 924 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2011
See White v. United States, 582 A.2d 774, 779 (D.C.1990) (per curiam); Martin v. United States, 435 A.2d 395, 398 (D.C.1981) (per curiam). . … See Order, Virginia v. Silva, CR02-2286 (Apr. 15, 2003). . See Order, Virginia v. Silva, CR02-2286 (Mar. 15, 2005). .D.C. Bar R.
Cited 14 timesPublished919 A.2d 1137 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2007
V. Conclusion We uphold the Board’s conclusion that respondent violated Rule 8.4(c) but conclude that a thirty-day suspension is warranted. … Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733, 756 , 94 S.Ct. 2547 , 41 L.Ed.2d 439 (1974). 5 .
Cited 19 timesPublished516 A.2d 513 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1986
Springer v. United States, 388 A.2d 846, 855 (D.C.1978) (quoting Hyman v. United States, 342 A.2d 43, 44 (D.C.1975)); see also Villaroman v. … Harley v. United States, 471 A.2d 1013, 1015 (D.C.1984); see Warren v. United States, 436 A.2d 821, 837 (D.C.1981); Morris v. United States, 389 A.2d 1346, 1350 (D.C.1978).
Cited 39 timesPublished911 A.2d 822 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 2006
See Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Slavin, 145 S.W.3d 538 (Tenn.2004). On August 22, 2005, Bar Counsel filed a certified copy of the order from the Supreme Court of Tennessee. … As we find support in the record for the Board’s findings, we accept them, and adopt the sanction the Board recommended. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Edward A.
Cited 2 timesPublished574 A.2d 265 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1990
As part of a general revision of our rules governing solicitation of professional employment, subsection (3) was adopted shortly after the Supreme Court’s decision in Ohralik v. … See also Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Ass’n, 486 U.S. 466, 475 , 108 S.Ct. 1916, 1922 , 100 L.Ed.2d 475 (1988).
Cited 2 timesPublished482 A.2d 120 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1984
As we observed in Howard University v. … Cornell Co. v. Ceramic Coating Co., 200 U.S.App. D.C. 126, 129, 626 F.2d 990, 993 (1980) (citations omitted); see Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVay, 431 A.2d 543, 549-550 (D.C.1981).
Cited 52 timesPublishedDano Resource Recovery, Inc. v. District of Columbia
620 A.2d 1346 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1993
DeVito v. … Co. v.
Cited 20 timesPublished883 A.2d 106 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2005
Corp. v. District of Columbia, 443 A.2d 29, 33 (D.C.1982)) (internal citation omitted). … See Washington Props., Inc. v.
Cited 41 timesPublishedRickard v. District of Columbia
214 A.2d 476 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1965
See Brown v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 170 A.2d 925 (1961); Tyrrell v. State, 173 Neb. 859 , 115 N.W.2d 459 (1962); Commonwealth v. Unger, 190 Pa.Super. 43 , 151 A.2d 782 (1959). … Brown v. District of Columbia, sqpra. Affirmed. 1 . D.C.Code 1961, § 40-302 (d). 2 .
Cited 9 timesPublished719 A.2d 98 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1998
States District Court for the District of Maryland, of eight counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 , 1346 and 2. 2 United States v. … Williams Dated: _ *100 All members of the Board concur in this Report and Recommendation except Mr. Fox, who did not participate. 1 . United States v. Bereano, Nos. 95-5312 & 95-5395, - F.3d - (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 1998).
Cited 6 timesPublishedJordan v. District of Columbia
362 A.2d 114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1976
Hotel Association v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board, D.C.App., 318 A.2d 294 (1974). … Canney v. Board of Pub. Instruction of Alachua. Cty., 278 So.2d 260 (Fla.1973). 13 .
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna