Case law

Ritch v. Director of Vehicles & Traffic of D. of C.

124 A.2d 301 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1956

See Chappelle v. Board of Commissioners, D.C.Mun.App., 110 A.2d 697 ; Lambert v. Board of Commissioners of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 116 A.2d 926 . 2 . National Labor Relations Board v. … Chappelle v. Board of Commissioners, D.C.Mun.App., 110 A.2d 697 . 6 . Code 1951, Supp. III, Title 1, Administration, Appendix, p. 14. 7 . Code 1951, Supp. III, Title 1, Administration, Appendix, p. 14. 8 .

Walton v. District of Columbia

670 A.2d 1346 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1996

See District of Columbia v. Mayhew, 601 A.2d 37, 43 (D.C.1991); Adarand Constructors Inc. v. Pena, — U.S. -, -, 115 S.Ct. *1352 2097, 2105-08 , 132 L.Ed.2d 158 (1995); Bolling v. … The Board simply rewrote and re-issued its first written statement finding Walton guilty of the regulatory violations. .See Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982).

Smith v. Smith

256 A.2d 833 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1969

Brown v. Brown, supra. Thus, since Jones had a living wife at the time, his marriage to appellee in 1930 was void, and therefore she was free to marry appellant. … Harsley v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 160, 151 , 187 F.2d 213, 214 (1951). New York has the same rule. See Brown v. Brown, 51 Misc.2d 839 , 274 N.Y.S.2d 484 (1966). 2 . Wheeler v.

In Re Chapman

962 A.2d 922 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2009

Respondent did not appeal from the Board’s Report and Recommendation, but Bar Counsel takes exception to the Board’s recommended sanction. … (citing United States v. Grayson, 438 U.S. 41, 50-54 , 98 S.Ct. 2610 , 57 L.Ed.2d 582 (1978)).

Matter of Banks

577 A.2d 316 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1990

Respondent further contends, relying on Stackhouse v. … Similarly, his reliance on Jameson v. King, 571 A.2d 216 (D.C.1990), is to no avail since that too does not address economic losses. Further, Stackhouse v.

Hughey Payne v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

99 A.3d 665 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2014

Hosp. v. … This court‘s ―standard of review mirrors that which the Board is bound to apply‖ when the Board reviews an ALJ‘s compensation order. Id. at 1276 (citing Marriott Int’l v.

Matter of Buckley

535 A.2d 863 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1987

In a dissenting opinion, three members of the Board recommended disbarment. Bar Counsel filed an exception to the sanction agreed upon by tbe Board’s majority. … Nonetheless, we must consider that a sanction imposed pursuant to a disciplinary proceeding is, in effect, a judgment of an attorney’s continued fitness to practice his profession, District of Columbia Bar v.

Reaves v. Ainsworth

28 App. D.C. 157 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1906

Johnson v. Towsley, 13 Wall. 12, 83 , 20 L. ed. 485, 487. … In Smith v. Whitney, 116 U. S. 167 , 29 L. ed. 601, 6 Sup. Ct.

Herbin v. Hoeffel

727 A.2d 883 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1999

Brown, with whom Hillary A. Davidson, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellee. Before SCHWELB, FARRELL and RUIZ, Associate Judges. … See Dada v.

Taylor v. District of Columbia

691 A.2d 121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1997

Taylor drove Officer Brown to the First District Police Precinct to see his girlfriend. Officer Brown instructed Mr. Taylor to pull into the driveway of the police precinct, where he [Brown] got out of Mr. … In Wade v.

In Re Kerr

611 A.2d 551 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1992

The Board points to federal case law which interprets section 7206(1) as defining a lesser included offense of tax evasion under section 7201. See United States v. Kaiser, 893 F.2d 1300 (11th Cir.1990); United States v. … As the Second Circuit observed in United States v.

In Re Hager

812 A.2d 904 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2002

See Zucker v. … Nixon v.

Kelley v. Broadmoor Cooperative Apartments

676 A.2d 453 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 16, 1996

Walton v. District of Columbia, 670 A.2d 1346, 1353 (D.C.1996) (referencing Colbert v. Georgetown Univ., 641 A.2d 469, 472 (D.C.1994) (en banc)). See also Young v. Delaney, 647 A.2d 784, 788 (D.C.1994). … Johnson v. Hobson, 505 A.2d 1313, 1318 (D.C.1986).

Marlyn Condominium, Inc. v. McDowell

576 A.2d 1346 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1990

See Montgomery v. … Johnson v. Hobson, 505 A.2d 1313, 1317 (D.C.1986) (quoting Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. Norman, 309 So.2d 180, 182 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1975)). 8 .

In re Cooper

936 A.2d 832 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2007

before the Board. … District of Columbia v. Wical Ltd.

In Re Morrell

684 A.2d 361 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1996

V. … Morrell cites two cases, In re Dwyer, 399 A.2d 1 (D.C.1979), and Eilers v.

Wilson-Bey v. United States

871 A.2d 1155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2005

Upon arrival at Teresa Brown’s apartment house, the women tried to locate Ms. Brown’s apartment, yelled at Ms. *1159 Brown to come out, and Ms. Wilson-Bey threatened to kill her. When Ms. … M.A.P. v.

In re Winstead

69 A.3d 390 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 2013

See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 558 , 94 S.Ct. 2968 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974) (“The touchstone of due process is protection of the individual against arbitrary action of government.” … See Dyas v. United States, 376 A.2d 827, 832 (D.C.1977). . Respondent strenuously maintains that she did not engage in the unauthorized practice of law.

Jordan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

548 A.2d 792 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1988

Clayton v. … See Johnson v. General Motors, supra note 8, 641 F.2d at 1082. The conflict between what Knight said and what Jordan said made summary judgment impossible. Brown v.

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee

997 A.2d 65 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2010

MPD appealed the award to the District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board (“PERB” or “the Board”), and the Board entered an order affirming the award. … Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla., 457 U.S. 496 , 515 n. 19, 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982) (quotation marks omitted).