Case law

Murphy v. A.A. Beiro Construction Co.

679 A.2d 1039 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1996

Brown, with whom Robert G. Watt and Charles W. Durant, McLean, VA, were on the brief, for respondents. Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and TERRY and SCHWELB, Associate Judges. PER CURIAM. … v.

In re Andre P. Barber

128 A.3d 637 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2015

State Bar v. Attorney-Respondent, 367 So. 2d 179, 185 (Miss. 1979); In re Baun, 232 N.W.2d 621, 624-25 (Mich. 1975); cf. Littlejohn v. … United States v. Wong, 431 U.S. 174, 178 (1977). 5 Mr.

In Re Waller

524 A.2d 748 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1987

In Mackie v. Howland, 3 App. … Friedman v. Harris, 81 U.S.App.

Stroman v. United States

905 A.2d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 2006

When Officer Brown asked appellant if she owned the dogs, she first responded “yes” and later stated that she and her son owned the dogs. … Taking into account the trial court’s prerogative to make credibility determinations and the stringent standard of review, Mihas v.

Scott v. United States

672 A.2d 579 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1996

In re John R., 41 Md.App. 22 , 394 A.2d 818, 820 (1978). 2 See also Wildwood Storage Center, Inc. v. … Brown underscores the prejudice he suffered from the trial court’s failure to instruct on obstruction in the manner he desired. .

Davis v. United States

759 A.2d 665 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 2000

In Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 43 , 365 F.2d 976 (1966), an officer monitored a radio lookout for a suspect in a robbery. Melvin L. … Brown is distinguishable from this case, for there is no suggestion that the victim in Brown refused to provide his name.

Friends of Tilden Park, Inc. v. District of Columbia

806 A.2d 1201 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 2002

Friends is governed by a self-perpetuating board of directors. … See United Food & Commercial Workers Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 555-56 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). B.

In Re Ferber

703 A.2d 142 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1997

ORDER PER CURIAM: The Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) recommends that respondent, Mark S. … Massachusetts of thirty-three counts of mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 ,1343, and 1346 (1994), and twenty-five counts of violations of the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (1994). 1 See United States v.

Byrd v. United States

614 A.2d 25 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1992

Sykes v. United States, 585 A.2d 1335, 1338 (D.C.1991); Ramsey v. United States, 569 A.2d 142, 147 (D.C.1990). … We recently held in Poulnot v.

Eason v. United States

687 A.2d 922 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1996

A Browning automatic .22 with a sawed off barrel was found in a back pack behind a door in the apartment. … Rich, 481 A.2d 464, 470 (D.C.1984) (noting that arguably the witness, an alcohol control board member, did not offer opinion testimony but merely testified as to what hap *925 pened at a meeting and how the board reacted

District of Columbia v. Gandy

466 A.2d 851 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1983

jacket and brown pants. … See Gabrou v. May Department Stores Co., 462 A.2d 1102 (D.C.1983); Dent v. May Department Stores Co., 459 A.2d 1042 (D.C.1982); Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Kelly, 448 A.2d 856 (D.C.1982); Prieto v.

In Re Malvin

466 A.2d 1220 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 1983

See Florida Bar v. … App.D.C. 418, 543 F.2d 903 (1976); Athans v. Arizona Board of Dentists, 126 Ariz. 6 , 612 P.2d 57 (Ariz.Ct.App.1980); Black v. State Bar of California, 7 Cal.3d 676 , 499 P.2d 968 , 103 Cal.Rptr. 288 (1972).

Jenkins v. District of Columbia

379 A.2d 1177 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1977

Appellant’s argument is contrary to the decisions of this court in Miller v. Spencer, D.C.App., 330 A.2d 250 (1974), and Brown v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 304 A.2d 292 (1973). … Miller v. Spencer, supra at 252. The police report in the present case is of the same nature as the one rejected in Brown as inadequate to notify the District.

Facebook, Inc. v. James Pepe

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 2020

Brown under this rule, and Facebook has not made any contention to the contrary on appeal. 54 E.g., Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 33 (1984); Gentile v. … Brown. 65 So Mr.

Young v. United States

56 A.3d 1184 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 2012

See Terry v. … Davis v.

Morris v. United States

622 A.2d 1116 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1993

v. … Brown, supra, 409 A.2d at 1097 ; Johnson, supra, 552 A.2d at 517 (citations omitted); cf. Thompson v.

Matter of Vogel

382 A.2d 275 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1978

Keiser v. Bell, 332 F.Supp. 608 (E.D.Pa.1971) (removal of judge from office); Sarisohn v. … In Parker v.

In Re Childress

811 A.2d 805 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2002

See Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Childress, 364 Md. 48 , 770 A.2d 685 (2001) (Childress II). … Childress II, 770 A.2d at 688 (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v.

Herbin v. Hoeffel

727 A.2d 883 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1999

Brown, with whom Hillary A. Davidson, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellee. Before SCHWELB, FARRELL and RUIZ, Associate Judges. … See Dada v.

In re Thomas Fortune Fay

111 A.3d 1025 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2015

Rev. 425, 435-36, 438 (2012); see also Theard v. … Bar v.