Case law

Matter of Wild

361 A.2d 182 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1976

See District of Columbia Bar v. Kleindienst, D.C.App., 345 A.2d 146 (1975). . Findings and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, p. 6. . … Findings and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, p. 3. . Brief of Respondent, pp. 5-6. . Findings and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, p. 4. . District of Columbia Bar v. Kleindienst, supra at 148. .

William J. Davis, Inc. v. Slade

271 A.2d 412 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1970

Their cause failed, however, since the lease was admittedly void under our decision in Brown v. Southall Realty Co., D.C.App., 237 A.2d 834 (1968). … v.

In Re Richardson

692 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1997

See Barry v. … Overmyer Co. v.

Pride v. Howard University

384 A.2d 31 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1978

[Greene v. Howard University, supra at 88, 412 F.2d at 1135 ; emphasis added.] … Kaiser v. Real Estate Commission, D.C.Mun.App., 155 A.2d 715, 717 (1959).

In Re Kersey

520 A.2d 321 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1987

Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility at 11. 9 . We do not ignore the fact that many alcoholics require hospitalization and drug therapy to recover. 10 . See Salzman v. … See Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Aler, 301 Md. 389 , 483 A.2d 56 (1984); Carter v. Ross, 461 A.2d 675 (R.I.1983); Tenner v.

KRAMER ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Ikam, Ltd.

888 A.2d 247 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2005

Comstock & Co. v. … Brown v. Dyer, 489 A.2d 1081, 1083 (D.C.1985). 2. The Evidence The question of whether unjust enrichment occurred is one of law, which we decide de novo. 4934, Inc. v.

STEPHANIE C. ARTIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

135 A.3d 334 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2016

Brown challenging several notices of proposed infractions against her and alleging that Brown violated other employee rights regulations.  3 On November 15, 2010, appellant … Hedges v.

Graham v. United States

12 A.3d 1159 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 2011

(Larry) Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 88 (D.C.2004); see also (Henry) Brown v. United States, 881 A.2d 586, 599 (D.C.2005). … (Larry) Brown, supra, 840 A.2d at 88 (citing Morris v. United States, 398 A.2d 333, 336 (D.C.1978); Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App. D.C. 27, 39-40, 408 F.2d 1230, 1242-43 (1968)).

Murphy v. A.A. Beiro Construction Co.

679 A.2d 1039 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1996

Brown, with whom Robert G. Watt and Charles W. Durant, McLean, VA, were on the brief, for respondents. Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and TERRY and SCHWELB, Associate Judges. PER CURIAM. … v.

In re Andre P. Barber

128 A.3d 637 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2015

State Bar v. Attorney-Respondent, 367 So. 2d 179, 185 (Miss. 1979); In re Baun, 232 N.W.2d 621, 624-25 (Mich. 1975); cf. Littlejohn v. … United States v. Wong, 431 U.S. 174, 178 (1977). 5 Mr.

In re Daum

918 A.2d 1196 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 2007

No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. … Fourth District —Section I Committee v. Daum, Chancery No. 05-389, November 8, 2005. On April 27, 2006, Bar Counsel reported the discipline imposed by the Circuit Court for Arlington County.

In Re Reid

540 A.2d 754 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1988

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Reid, 308 Md. 646 , 521 A.2d 743, 744-745 (1987). … Attorney Grievance Commission v. Reid, supra note 1, 521 A.2d at 746 . The following stricter conditions of probation are recommended by the Board: A.

In Re Waller

524 A.2d 748 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1987

In Mackie v. Howland, 3 App. … Friedman v. Harris, 81 U.S.App.

Stroman v. United States

905 A.2d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 2006

When Officer Brown asked appellant if she owned the dogs, she first responded “yes” and later stated that she and her son owned the dogs. … Taking into account the trial court’s prerogative to make credibility determinations and the stringent standard of review, Mihas v.

In re J.M.

619 A.2d 497 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1992

MACK, Senior Judge, dissenting, but concurring in the order of remand: As a matter of law, I would have concluded that J.M. was seized when cornered by drug interdiction officers on board the bus. … Brown, et al. eds. 1941). . Putting aside the status of race, I note that commentators have suggested that a reasonable person who would feel free to walk away is a legal fiction. See Shawn V.

Scott v. United States

672 A.2d 579 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1996

In re John R., 41 Md.App. 22 , 394 A.2d 818, 820 (1978). 2 See also Wildwood Storage Center, Inc. v. … Brown underscores the prejudice he suffered from the trial court’s failure to instruct on obstruction in the manner he desired. .

In Re Childress

811 A.2d 805 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2002

See Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Childress, 364 Md. 48 , 770 A.2d 685 (2001) (Childress II). … Childress II, 770 A.2d at 688 (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v.

In re Seth Adam Robbins

192 A.3d 558 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 2018

See, e.g., Sturgis v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 629 A.2d 547, 554 (D.C. 1993). … Carr v. Rose, 701 A.2d 1065, 1075 (D.C. 1997) (quoting Smith v. Jenkins, 562 A.2d 610, 615 (D.C. 1989)). Mr.

In Re Thorup

461 A.2d 1018 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1983

SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943). The Board now recommends a two year suspension of respondent. … The Board correctly concluded that the privilege against self-incrimination may properly be invoked only under circumstances involving allegations of criminal misconduct. Lefkowitz v.

Schwartz v. Chow

867 A.2d 230 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 2005

See Zhou v. Jennifer Mall Restaurant, Inc., 534 A.2d 1268, 1269 (D.C.1987) (“Zhou 7”); Zhou v. Jennifer Mall Restaurant, Inc., 699 A.2d 348, 350 (D.C.1997) (“Zhou II”). … Poire v. Kaplan, 491 A.2d 529, 534 (D.C.1985); see Sargent v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 280 U.S.App.