Case law

Matter of Fogel

422 A.2d 966 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1980

While punishment is not the purpose of a disciplinary proceeding, see, e. g., District of Columbia Bar v. … Kelley v. Morris, D.C.App., 400 A.2d 1045 (1979). [2] The Hearing Committee, looking for guidance, had asked Assistant Bar Counsel to provide it with a summary of relevant prior disciplinary actions.

Gamble v. Gamble

258 A.2d 261 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1969

Day v. Day, 82 Nev. 317, 319 , 417 P.2d 914, 916 (1966). Accordingly, the Thomason decision is no support for appellant’s contention and the complaint was properly dismissed. Affirmed. 1 . Johnson v. … Kinney v. Kinney, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 346 , 196 F.2d 587 (1952); Fuller v. Fuller, D.C.App., 190 A.2d 252 (1963); Brown v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 75 A.2d 140 (1950).

Wilson-Bey v. United States

903 A.2d 818 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 2006

Brown was one of the women who had joined Ms. Blackwell in attacking Ms. Marbury. Upon arrival at Teresa Brown’s apartment house, the women tried to locate Ms. Brown’s unit, and they yelled at Ms. Brown to come out. Ms. … Brown; Ms. Marbury allegedly made a similar threat to Ms. Brown’s fian-cé. When Ms. Brown declined to leave her apartment, several of the women took turns stomping on Ms.

Kegley v. District of Columbia

440 A.2d 1013 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1982

Jones v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 375 A.2d 1 (1977). … [Clark’s Liquors, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 274 A.2d 414, 418 (1971), quoting in part from Securities and Exchange Commission v.

Pride v. Howard University

384 A.2d 31 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1978

[Greene v. Howard University, supra at 88, 412 F.2d at 1135 ; emphasis added.] … Kaiser v. Real Estate Commission, D.C.Mun.App., 155 A.2d 715, 717 (1959).

In Re Estate of Munawar

981 A.2d 584 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2009

Brown. The language at the top of the first page of the deed, as provided by the Recorder's office, indicates that the VA sold the deed to "Mary L. Brown, unmarried." … BROWN FRANKLIN TIBBS ... When recorded mail to: MARY L. BROWN FRANKLIN TIBBS 527 16th Street, NE Apt # 1 Washington, DC 20002 Approximately ten years later, in March 1999, Mary L. Brown married Mohammad Munawar.

In Re Thorup

461 A.2d 1018 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1983

SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943). The Board now recommends a two year suspension of respondent. … The Board correctly concluded that the privilege against self-incrimination may properly be invoked only under circumstances involving allegations of criminal misconduct. Lefkowitz v.

In Re Kersey

520 A.2d 321 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1987

Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility at 11. 9 . We do not ignore the fact that many alcoholics require hospitalization and drug therapy to recover. 10 . See Salzman v. … See Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Aler, 301 Md. 389 , 483 A.2d 56 (1984); Carter v. Ross, 461 A.2d 675 (R.I.1983); Tenner v.

In Re Zdravkovich

831 A.2d 964 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2003

See, e.g., Miller v. Avirom, 127 U.S.App. D.C. 867, 369-70, 384 F.2d 319, 321-22 (1967); Waugh v. D.C. Dep’t of Employment Servs., 786 A.2d 595, 596 (D.C.2001). … See Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v.

In Re Ray

675 A.2d 1381 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 9, 1996

Lusby v. Nethken, 262 Md. 584 , 278 A.2d 552, 553 (1971). … In Godette v.

Ware v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

157 A.3d 1275 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2017

See Springer v. … Further, even though petitioner raises an important concern regarding the CRB’s authority to raise issues sua sponte, see Brown v.

Teachey v. Carver

736 A.2d 998 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1999

In Tyler v. … City of Yonkers v.

In re J.M.

619 A.2d 497 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1992

MACK, Senior Judge, dissenting, but concurring in the order of remand: As a matter of law, I would have concluded that J.M. was seized when cornered by drug interdiction officers on board the bus. … Brown, et al. eds. 1941). . Putting aside the status of race, I note that commentators have suggested that a reasonable person who would feel free to walk away is a legal fiction. See Shawn V.

Fifth Baptist Church of Washington City v. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad

15 D.C. 43 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1885

Brown, a notary public, and certified to be a true and verified copy of a certificate of incorporation, and the whole of the same, as recorded in Liber No. 1, folio 153 et seq., “Acts of Incorporation for the District of … For instance, boards of trade and cemetery companies are not required to file any certificate at all, but upon the mere *46 election of trustees they are thereupon made bodies corporate.

In re Daum

918 A.2d 1196 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 2007

No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. … Fourth District —Section I Committee v. Daum, Chancery No. 05-389, November 8, 2005. On April 27, 2006, Bar Counsel reported the discipline imposed by the Circuit Court for Arlington County.

Carroll v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

487 A.2d 622 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1985

Osborn v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division, 178 Ind.App. 22, 27 , 381 N.E.2d 495, 500 (1978) (citing Miedreich v. Lauenstein, 232 U.S. 236 , 34 S.Ct. 309 , 58 L.Ed. 584 (1914)). … Accord Osborn v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division, supra, 178 Ind.App. at 27 , 381 N.E.2d at 500 ; Lentz v.

In Re Reid

540 A.2d 754 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1988

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Reid, 308 Md. 646 , 521 A.2d 743, 744-745 (1987). … Attorney Grievance Commission v. Reid, supra note 1, 521 A.2d at 746 . The following stricter conditions of probation are recommended by the Board: A.

Malloy v. United States

797 A.2d 687 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 2002

The caller did not testify at trial, but a tape of her 911 call was introduced through Officer Brown. … See Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 , 66 S.Ct. 1239 , 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946). Questioning of Officer Brown was not the only means through which the evidence could have been introduced.

In Re Fuller

930 A.2d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2007

No. 06-BG-1303 Bar Docket No. 349-06 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY This reciprocal discipline matter comes before the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) as a result … Bar v. Fuller, No. SC05-2324, slip op. at 2 (Fla. July 12, 2006).

In Re Greenspan

910 A.2d 324 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2006

District of Columbia v. … Gen.Stat. § 51-84 (2003); Burton v.