Case law

Chung v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

751 A.2d 989 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 2000

See District of Columbia Preservation League v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs, 711 A.2d 1273, 1275 (D.C.1998); Reneau v. District of Columbia, 676 A.2d 913, 917 (D.C.1996). … See Kingsley v.

Capitol Hill Hospital v. District of Columbia State Health Planning & Development Agency

600 A.2d 793 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1991

Co. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Bd., 549 A.2d 315, 318 (D.C.1988) (Superior Court jurisdiction for “protest” rather than “appeal” of Board’s decision); Capitol Hill Restoration Soc’y, Inc. v. … (quoting Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 183, 194 , 15 L.Ed. 595 (1857)); District of Columbia v.

Committee of Neighbors Directly Impacted by LAMB Application v. DC Board of Zoning Adjustment and LAMB Public Charter School

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2019

Alana V. Rusin, with whom Cary R. … Homes, Inc. v.

Augburn v. United States

514 A.2d 452 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1986

In Frazier v. … In Toliver v.

In Re Cleaver-Bascombe

986 A.2d 1191 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2010

Mgmt. v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 677 A.2d 46, 48 (D.C.1996) (citing Kritsidi- *1196 mas v. Sheskin, 411 A.2d 370, 371 (D.C.1980)); see also M.A.P. v. … Id..; Hsu v. United States, 392 A.2d 972, 980-81 (D.C.1978) (stating the rule that "one witness plus independent corroborative evidence will also suffice” for proof of perjury). .

Shelton v. United States

983 A.2d 979 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2009

Brown, supra, 554 A.2d at 1160 (citing Alston v. … Watkins v. United States, 846 A.2d 293, 301 (D.C.2004); Brown, supra, 554 A.2d at 1162 .

Williams v. United States

927 A.2d 1064 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2007

Lucas v. United States, 476 A.2d 1140, 1142 (D.C.1984) (citing United States v. Workcuff, 137 U.S.App. D.C. 263, 264-65, 422 F.2d 700, 701-02 (1970)) (footnote omitted). … Lucas, 476 A.2d at 1142 ; see also McCoy v.

Sitcov v. District of Columbia Bar

885 A.2d 289 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 2005

Davis v. … Huffstetler, 433 So.2d 964, 965 (Fla.1983); Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or. 446 , 648 P.2d 1289, 1293 (1982); Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm’n Bar Ass’n v.

Kelley v. Morris

400 A.2d 1045 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1979

Nor can the suit survive as one against the Board itself since the statutes creating the Board of Education did not make it a suable entity. See Roberson v. … District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, D.C.App., 359 A.2d 28 , 31 n.4 (1976); Miller v.

Kinard v. United States

288 A.2d 233 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1972

Lee, D.C.App., 271 A.2d 566 (1970) and Dickerson v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 120 A.2d 588 (1956). … Rouse v. United States, 123 U.S.App. D.C. 348, 350, 359 F.2d 1014, 1016 (1966). [Footnote omitted.] . Id. Cf. Jackson v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 353 F.2d 862 (1965).

In Re Goldsborough

654 A.2d 1285 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1995

See, e.g., Fehlhaber v. … See, e.g., United States v.

In Re Brown

320 A.2d 92 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1974

See, in this connection, United States v. Marshall, 451 F.2d 372 (9th Cir. 1971). … As the court said in Sykes v.

District of Columbia v. Tarlosky

675 A.2d 77 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 9, 1996

He concluded: The House and Senate Committee Reports provide no hint that the “scheduled rate of compensation” phrase was meant to be limiting or that the equalization provision should in some way not cover across the board … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 422 A.2d 1281, 1284 (D.C.1980).

Matter of Burka

423 A.2d 181 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1980

[Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 , 96 S.Ct. 893, 903 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976).] … Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970) (prohibiting termination of welfare benefits before an adversary hearing); Sniadach v.

Miller v. D.C. OEA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 2020

On June 6, 2017, the OEA Board affirmed. Ms. Miller petitioned the Superior Court for review of the OEA Board’s decision. On October 30, 2018, the Superior Court affirmed. Ms. … See Valdes v. D.C.

Jones v. Pennsylvania Railroad

19 D.C. 178 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1890

Brown, 17 Wall., 445 . … Brown, 17 Wallace,. 445, appears to sanction this.

Grant v. United States

402 A.2d 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 1979

He further testified that he had not known the car was not Brown’s. … Taylor v.

United States v. Turner

699 A.2d 1125 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1997

Cauthen v. United States, 592 A.2d 1021 (D.C.1991); Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991). … Peay v. United States, 597 A.2d 1318,1319-20 (D.C.1991) (en bane); Gomez, swpra, 597 A.2d at 889; *1128 Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1012-15 ; Duhart v.

Johnson v. District of Columbia, Department of Health

163 A.3d 746 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 2017

Faulkenstein v. … Ait-Ghezala v.

Shelton v. United States

388 A.2d 859 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1978

He stated that at the time of the robbery he was with his girlfriend, Vera Brown, celebrating her birthday. Ms. … v.