Case law

Smith v. United States

392 A.2d 990 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1978

Brookhart v. Janis, 384 U.S. 1, 3 , 86 S.Ct. 1245 , 16 L.Ed. 314 (1966). The trial court here relied on Brown v. … See Brown v. United States, supra; Thomas v. United States, supra. See also Fed.R.Evid. 609(d); United States v. Decker, 543 F.2d 1102, 1104-05 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied sub nom. Vice v.

Goodall v. United States

759 A.2d 1077 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2000

See Holland v. … Butler, 838 F.2d 59 , 63 (5th Cir.1987) (holding parole eligibility is a collateral consequence to a guilty plea); Brown v.

Williams v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 2022

Brown’s prior inconsistent statement — concerning the Hickson assault — to the grand jury. See (Latasha) Brown v. … Brown, the nature of that crime, and the potential penalty. Longus v. United States, 52 A.3d 836, 851 (D.C. 2012).

RICHARD C. BARTEL v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2016

Bartel also cannot prove through competent evidence that he has the right to enforce the instrument, § 3-309 (b), or that he had that right ―when loss of (…continued) (Darlene) Brown v. … (Carla) Brown v.

RICHARD C. BARTEL v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2015

Bartel also cannot prove through competent evidence that he has the right to enforce the instrument, § 3-309 (b), or that he had that right “when loss of (…continued) (Darlene) Brown v. … (Carla) Brown v.

Watwood v. Real Estate Commission

196 A.2d 635 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1964

Robbins v. Roumel, D.C.Mun.App., 138 A.2d 922, 923 (1958); Jay v. General Realties Co., D.C.Mun.App., 49 A.2d 752, 755 (1946). . Garrison v. … Burch v. Board of Commissioners, D.C.App., 191 A.2d 604 (1963). . Hime v. Florida Real Estate Commission, Fla., 61 So.2d 182, 183 (1952).

Winfield v. United States

676 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1996

To the extent our decisions in Brown, Beale, and later cases, e.g., Watson v. United States, 612 A.2d 179, 182 (D.C.1992), impose a more exacting standard of relevance, we disavow them. … Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093 (D.C.1979); Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796 (D.C.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).

Tucci v. District of Columbia

956 A.2d 684 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2008

See, e.g., Brown v. District of Columbia, 853 A.2d 733 (D.C.2004) (notice untimely); District of Columbia v. Dunmore, 662 A.2d 1356 (D.C.1995) (notice untimely); Winters v. … Lussier v. Dep’t of Transpor *696 tation, 228 Conn. 343 , 636 A.2d 808, 814 (1994). See Brown, 239 U.S.App.

Walsh v. Cooper

31 A.2d 883 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1943

Brown in 1936. Plaintiff purchased the property from Brown in May, 1942, and received an assignment of the rental contract. … While our decision does not depend upon that or any other section of the Act, we direct attention to the fact that the constitutional question has been settled by the Supreme Court in Block v.

District of Columbia v. Group Insurance Administration

633 A.2d 2 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1993

(CAB or Board). … Federal Maritime Comm’n, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 261, 264 , 399 F.2d 994, 997 (1968)); see Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. Brown, 600 F.2d 429, 434-35 (3d Cir.1979). B.

Hansen v. Thalley

279 A.2d 499 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1971

In the first place the Board’s position is scarcely consistent with the purpose of the Act which is to protect the public from incompetent practitioners. Culler v. … Hansen v. Physical Therapists Examining Board, D.C.App., 228 A.2d 497, 498 (1967).

Pearson v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 2022

E.g., Wagshal v. Selig, 403 A.2d 338, 341 (D.C. 1979). That is not a flat rule, however. See, e.g., Brown v. M St. … Cf., e.g., Allworth v.

Jenkins v. United States

506 A.2d 1120 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1986

Her bus arrived a couple of minutes later, but appellant took hold of her arm and prevented her from boarding. Appellant repeated his invitation. … When complainant again refused he pulled a twelve inch long brown paper package out of his pocket and warned her that she “was going to be laying in the street with blood coming out of [her].”

University of the District of Columbia Faculty Assoc/NEA v. Board of Trustees of University of the District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2021

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLEE. … Parker v. K & L Gates, LLP, 76 A.3d 859, 867 (D.C. 2013) (quoting Haynes v. Kuder, 591 A.2d 1286, 1289 (D.C. 1991)).

White v. United States

425 A.2d 616 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1980

Brown, 500 F.2d 375, 377 (4th Cir. 1974); Correale v. United States, 479 F.2d 944, 947 (1st Cir. 1973); see Braxton v. United States, D.C.App., 328 A.2d 385, 388 (1974). … Santobello, supra 404 U.S. at 262-63 , 92 S.Ct. at 498-499 ; see Bowler, supra at 855-56 ; Crusco, supra at 26-27 ; Brown, supra at 377-78 ; United States v.

Kumar v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

25 A.3d 9 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2011

Brown v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 844 A.2d 1113, 1118 (D.C.2004). … Everson v.

Thompson v. United States

745 A.2d 308 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 2000

Thompson and no lookout was for a brown paper bag .... ” Nor did Officer Timlick ever see or recover a brown paper bag from the Nissan. … Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991) (citing Lawrence, 566 A.2d at 60 ). Thompson asserts “that the police seized him without probable cause or reasonable suspicion.”

Ellis v. United States

834 A.2d 858 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2003

Despite the clear teaching of Giles , appellant relies on language in Brown v. … In all events, because Giles was decided before Brown it is Giles , and not Brown , that is binding precedent. See Thomas v.

Alliegro v. ACandS, Inc.

691 A.2d 102 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1997

Abebe v. Benitez, 667 A.2d 834, 836 (D.C.1995). … In District of Columbia v.

Railco Multi-Construction Co. v. Gardner

564 A.2d 1167 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1989

Area Transit Auth., supra, 255 U.S.App.D.C. 148 , 800 F.2d 1173 , the Board reaffirmed its decision on the coverage issue. Gardner v. … Brown, 422 A.2d 1281, 1284 (D.C.1980) (Congress presumed to be aware of preexisting statutes).