Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

0.36s

  • Honemond v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Georgetown University

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2023

    Though the court’s review is of the CRB’s decision, we do not “ignore the compensation order which is the subject of the Board’s review.” Georgetown Univ. Hosp. v. D.C. Dep’t of Emp. … Area Transit Auth. v. D.C. Dep’t of Emp. Servs., 926 A.2d 140, 149 (D.C. 2007) (“Browne”). A “disability” is a “physical or mental incapacity because of injury which results in the loss of wages.” Negussie v. D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hawkins v. United States

    606 A.2d 753 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1992

    Brown, 519 F.2d 1368 (6th Cir.1975), upon which Hawkins relies. Brown was convicted of aiding and assisting in the escape of a federal prisoner. Id. at 1369 . … Stewart v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Trapps v. United States

    887 A.2d 484 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 2005

    Brown v. United States, 881 A.2d 586, 593 (D.C.2005) (quoting Russell v. United States, 698 A.2d 1007, 1012 (D.C.1997)) (other citations and internal quotation marks omitted). … See Selby v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. U.S. Safe Deposit Co.

    552 A.2d 859 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1989

    The Jones decision also overlooked the paragraph in our Brown opinion (possibly *862 because the case was miscited) in which we referred to Allison v. … M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 (D.C.1971). 7 . 70 Misc.2d 215 , 333 N.Y.S.2d 261 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1972). 8 . See Brown, supra, 425 A.2d at 1312-13 . 9 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Angarano v. United States

    312 A.2d 295 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1973

    Brown v. … Court holding “. . . regardless of the merit or lack of merit of these complaints, other counsel should have been appointed to represent Brown when the proceedings took this turn”; Christopher Smith v. U.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Kingsley v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer

    657 A.2d 1141 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 1, 1995

    See Smith v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 548 A.2d 95, 97 (D.C.1988) (citation omitted). … There is a serious question, therefore, in light of this language in the regulations, whether the Board has acted pursuant to its own regulations. See Macauley v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harvin v. United States

    297 A.2d 774 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1972

    Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 338 F.2d 543 (1964); Sellers v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 271 F.2d 475 (1959) (per curiam); cf. United States v. … Brown, infra note 5), or is impermissibly seeking to invade the province of the jury. See Chavez v. United States, 258 F.2d 816 (10th Cir. 1958), cert. denied sub nom., Tenorio v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Quality Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

    505 A.2d 73 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1986

    Liberty v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 410 A.2d 191, 192 (D.C.1979). Although the record is deficient, 8 such evidence does emerge. … Brown: Mr. Chairman, the vote is 9 in favor, 2 opposed and 2 present. Chairman Dixon: All right, fine. The motion carries.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. United States

    857 A.2d 451 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 2004

    Brown did not make such statements. See, e.g., Taylor v. United States, 608 A.2d 451, 461 (D.C.) … Brown’s grand jury testimony that she did not see what occurred in the alley. Furthermore, Ms. Brown testified at trial.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Jones v. United States

    999 A.2d 917 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2010

    After a discussion with both parties and Jones’s renewed request for a mistrial, the court decided to give the jury an instruction based on a jury charge given by the trial court in Brown v. … Additionally, the continued deliberations after the Brown instruction “strong[ly] indicate] that the jurors did not surrender their will.” Coleman v. United States, 515 A.2d 439, 453 (D.C.1986).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Estate of Derricotte

    744 A.2d 535 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2000

    Gilbert Phillips, et al., Appellants, v. Ida Brown Bryant, et al., Appellees. Nos. 95-PR-1008, 96-PR-68, 96-PR-170, 97-PR-94, 97-PR-239, 97-PR-433 and 97-PR-1437. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. … Bryant's rebuttal case, of census records from 1910 and 1920 reporting that Joseph and Elizabeth Brown had children including Ida, whose listed age was consistent with a 1907 birth date. See Adkins v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • DANIEL GRIFFIN v. UNITED STATES

    144 A.3d 34 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 2016

    Brown v. United States, 881 A.2d 586, 596 (D.C. 2005). … Brown, 881 A.2d at 596.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Parker v. United States

    601 A.2d 45 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1991

    The trial judge concluded that upon seeing the brown paper bag, the police had probable cause, and he therefore denied the motion to suppress. 12 In United States v. … Beatty v. United States, 544 A.2d 699, 701 (D.C.1988). 17 The government in this case proceeded on the theory that both appellants constructively possessed 18 the drugs found in the brown paper bag.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONTRACT APPEALS BOARD, and PRINCE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and W.M. SCHLOSSER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC

    145 A.3d 523 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 2016

    Sys., Inc. v. … Historical support for the liberal approach to notice requirements adopted by other boards of contract appeals and federal courts can be found in United States v. Cunningham, 125 F.2d 28, 30 (D.C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Guangsha Wang v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd.

    142 A.3d 575 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Davenport v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

    579 A.2d 1155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1990

    Hershon v. … See Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harris v. United States

    489 A.2d 464 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1985

    Edelin v. United States, 227 A.2d 395 (D.C.1967). Detective Brown’s testimony explaining the ways in which heroin may be administered was probative in this essential element. … Brown, 571 F.2d 980, 987 (6th Cir.1978) (same). .

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Davis v. United States

    735 A.2d 467 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1999

    Corda, which was Brown’s neighborhood. … See, e.g., Jefferson v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bell v. United States

    801 A.2d 117 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2002

    Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. at 820 , 110 S.Ct. 3139 (quoting Queen v. Osman, 15 Cox Crim. Cas. 1, 3 (Eng. N. Wales Cir. 1881)). … V.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Burnette v. United States

    600 A.2d 1082 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 1991

    See Speight v. United States, 599 A.2d 794, 796 (D.C.1991); In re T.M., 577 A.2d 1149 , 1151 & n. 5 (D.C.1990); Bernard v. United States, 575 A.2d 1191, 1195 (D.C.1990) (citing Brown v. … Brown, 546 A.2d at 397 ; see also Easley v. United States, 482 A.2d 779, 782 (D.C.1984).

    Cited 20 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.