Case law

Brisbon v. United States

894 A.2d 1121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2006

Brown’s testimony on the same subject. We reject the second argument because it is precluded by Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38 , 105 S.Ct. 460 , 83 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984). A. … Bryant v. United States, 859 A.2d 1093, 1107 (D.C.2004) (citations omitted); see Price v. United States, 545 A.2d 1219, 1226 (D.C.1988) (“a lapse of time is relevant, but not controlling”); Bandoni v.

Tony Armstrong & Floyd Joiner v. United States

164 A.3d 102 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 2017

United States v. … Umanzor v. United States, 803 A.2d 983, 993 (D.C. 2002) (citing Anderson v.

Industrial Bank of Washington v. Allied Consulting Services

571 A.2d 1166 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1990

Scott v. District of Columbia, 493 A.2d 319, 323 (D.C.1985). … Our reasoning in Lonon v.

Cooper v. Starbucks Coffee Corp.

164 A.3d 66 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 2017

United States v. … Brown informed him that Starbucks had already decided to fire him. Other than the letter, Mr. Cooper has consistently denied the pushing allegation, including under ¡oath. Washington Times v.

Parkes v. Lewis

28 App. D.C. 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1906

The reason is well stated in Luger v. Browning, 21 App. D. C. 204: “But this question is one which, except, perhaps, in very rare and exceptional cases, this court will not undertake to determine. … Bader v. Vajem, 14 App. D. C. 241, 254; Stevens v. Seher, 11 App. D. C. 245, 251; Cross v. Phillips, 14 App. D. C. 228, 236.” Hammond v. Basch, 24 App. D. C. 473; Fowler v. Boyce, 27 App. D. C. 55.

Cordell Smith v. United States

203 A.3d 790 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 2019

Moreover, the evidence suggested Austin was too 15 Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). 16 Brown v. … Johnson v.

In re: A.W.

92 A.3d 1094 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2014

Although the other three boarded when he and his nephew did, the two groups were not together. … Gorke described the assailant as wearing a brown coat and short hair.

Kahn v. Wall

68 A.2d 862 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1949

Kindleberger, 329 U.S. 803 , 67 S.Ct. 495 , 91 L.Ed. 686 ; The Blanchard Machine Company v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation Adjustment Board, App.D.C.,-F.2d-. … Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. Feldman, 256 U.S. 170 , 41 S.Ct. 465 , 65 L.Ed. 877 .

Washington Teachers' Union Local 6 v. District of Columbia Public Schools

77 A.3d 441 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 2013

Brown v. Watts, 993 A.2d 529, 533 (D.C.2010) (alteration in original) (quoting D.C.Code § l-616.52(b)). … King v.

Johnson v. United States

552 A.2d 513 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1989

Punch v. United States, D.C.App. 377 A.2d 1353, 1358 (1977). Brown, supra, 409 A.2d at 1097 (emphasis added); see Shepard v. United States, 538 A.2d 1115, 1117 (D.C.1988); Beale v. … E.g., Stack, supra, 519 A.2d at 147 ; Beale, supra, 465 A.2d 796 ; Brown, supra, 409 A.2d 1093 ; United States v. Thornburg, 844 F.2d 573, 599 (8th Cir.1988); United States v.

Williams v. United States

881 A.2d 557 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 2005

See Catlett v. … See United States v.

Van Ness v. United States

568 A.2d 1079 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1990

Singletary v. United States , 383 A.2d 1064 , 1073 (D.C. 1978). II. … See United States v. Telfaire , 152 U.S.App.D.C. 146, 152 , 469 F.2d 552 , 558 (1972).

Patrick F. Andrews v. United States

179 A.3d 279 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 2018

Veney v. … See also Douglas v.

Villine v. United States

297 A.2d 785 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1972

The Supreme Court resolved this problem in Frazier v. … See Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483 , 84 S.Ct. 889 , 11 L.Ed.2d 856 (1964); Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610 , 81 S.Ct. 776 , 5 L.Ed.2d 828 (1961). 3 . See also Dupont v. United States, D.C.

Kammerman v. Kammerman

543 A.2d 794 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 23, 1988

Brown v. Brown, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 319 , 205 F.2d 720 (1953) (relying on Kephart v. … In Brown v.

McNeil v. United States

465 A.2d 807 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1983

In Napue v. … Thereafter, Brady v.

Hawkins v. United States

482 A.2d 1230 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1984

See Lewis v. … Edelin v. United States, 227 A.2d 395, 399 (D.C.1967). Detective Brown stated on direct examination that 201 milligrams of powder, eleven percent of which is cocaine, is a usable amount.

Atkinson v. Boardman

2 F. Cas. 97 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1847

Board-man was founded, but who is the inventor of the improvements which have made the matter patentable. That such improvements have been made, is admitted by both parties and by the Commissioner. … The pumps were cast in Browning’s foundry. Cyrus Currin, of the firm of Davis, Currin & Co., machinists at Newark, New Jersey, testifies that they made five of these steam-pumps for Mr.

McMahon v. Anderson, Hibey and Blair

728 A.2d 656 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1999

See, e.g., Brown v. Southall Realty Co., 237 A.2d 834 (D.C.1968); Diamond Housing Corp. v. … See Colker v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 474 A.2d 820 (D.C.1983) (upholding BZA determination that financial consulting services not permitted in an SP zone); Keefe Co. v.

FAMILY FEDERATION FOR WORLD PEACE AND UNIFICATION INTERNATIONAL v. HYUN JIN MOON

129 A.3d 234 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2015

Brown, Caroline E. Reynolds, Amit P. Mehta, Adam B. Abelson, Keisha N. Stanford, Peter J. Romatowski, Adrian Wager-Zito, Shay Dvoretzky, Yaakov Roth, and Francis D. … Cir. 1900); see also Lewis v. Don King Prods., Inc., 94 F. Supp. 2d 430, 444 (S.D.N.Y. 2000); Lamm v. Board of Comm’rs for Vermilion Hosp. Serv. Dist. No 1, 378 So. 2d 919, 922 (La. 1979); Dousman v.