Case law

MARK E. LEWIS v. UNITED STATES.

138 A.3d 1188 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 2016

Brown and “get [her] f***ed up.” We review this question de novo. Sutton v. United States, 988 A.2d 478, 482 (D.C. 2010). Under D.C. … Brown is sufficient to prove appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See Graham v.

Moorehead v. District of Columbia

747 A.2d 138 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 2000

Wanzer v. … United States v.

Parker v. United States

476 A.2d 173 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 31, 1984

In Arnold v. … Although the Supreme Court in Brown v. Ohio, supra, specifically held that the imposition of consecutive sentences for the same offense violates the Double Jeopardy Clause, this court in Doepel v.

Poole v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

77 A.3d 460 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 2013

Brown granted petitioner’s claim in its entirety. … See generally Munyan v.

Jones v. Thompson

953 A.2d 1121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2008

See Brown v. George Washington University, 802 A.2d 382, 385 (D.C.2002) (“ ‘[T]here is no issue for trial unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmov-ing party for a jury to return a verdict for that party. … See, e.g., Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791 , 103 S.Ct. 2706 , 77 L.Ed.2d 180 (1983) (discussing requirements of due process in relation to tax sales); District of Columbia v.

Mitchell v. District of Columbia

736 A.2d 228 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1999

See also Brown v. … .”); Mack v.

White v. Luber

144 A.2d 774 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1958

There are, of course, many such decisions, among them Cellini v. Moss, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 114 , 232 F.2d 371 ; Dewey v. Clark, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 137 , 180 F.2d 766 ; Turek v. … Thus, in Cellini v.

Drew v. Ridley

632 A.2d 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1993

In Jones v. … See King v. Kidd, Nos. 90-CV-1621, 91-CV-283, 1993 WL 326062 (D.C. Aug. 26, 1993), slip op. at 8-11; Customers Parking, Inc. v.

Beaner v. United States

845 A.2d 525 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2004

Brown’s feet. … V.

Gilchrist v. United States

954 A.2d 1006 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2008

Ross had told him about “boards,” Mr. Hamilton answered: He said something about some boards. Body by some boards, body under some boards, something about some boards.... He said something about some boards. … Brown v.

Woodridge Nursery School v. Jessup

269 A.2d 199 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1970

Thus even before the Act became effective the Board was required to make findings of fact in order to permit the court to review the Board’s decision. 18 .Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. … See also Allentuck v. District of Columbia Min. W. & I. Safe. Bd., D.C.App., 261 A.2d 826 (1969).

Snyder v. George Washington University

890 A.2d 237 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2006

v. … Brown, 844 A.2d at 1117 -18 (citing Super. Ct. Civ. R. 50(a)). “Thus, ‘[a] verdict may be directed only if it is clear that the plaintiff has not established a prima facie case.’ ” Haynesworth v. D.H.

Barnett v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

491 A.2d 1156 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1985

Malcolm Price, Inc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 350 A.2d 730, 733 (D.C.1976). … Lauer, 234 U.S.App.D.C. 384, 393 , 729 F.2d 1475, 1484 (1984); Committee for GI Rights v. Callaway, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 73, 81 , 518 F.2d 466, 474 (1975); Power Plant Division, Brown & Root, Inc. v.

Graves v. United States

467 A.2d 712 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1983

Dillingham v. United States, 423 U.S. 64 , 96 S.Ct. 303 , 46 L.Ed.2d 205 (1975). The facts which underlay appellant’s arrest are related fully in Brown v. … Strickland v. United States, 389 A.2d 1325, 1331 (D.C.1978); Branch v. United States, supra, 372 A.2d at 1002 . The government argues that the parole board detainer filed against appellant precludes implied notice.

Ellis v. United States

395 A.2d 404 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1978

After they left, Jacqueline Brown made her way into the living room, where she discovered the lifeless bodies of Green and Gerald Brown. As a result of her wounds, Jacqueline Brown was hospitalized until early February. … Baxter v. United States, supra, at 385. The testimony of Jacqueline Brown was a searing indictment of Ellis’ alibi defense.

McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

947 A.2d 1191 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 2008

Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 700 A.2d 787, 791-92 (D.C.1997). … Amoco Oil Co. v.

Napper v. United States

22 A.3d 758 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2011

(Kenneth) Dickerson v. United States, 677 A.2d 509, 512 (D.C.1996) (citation omitted); Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991). … See United States v.

Parker v. United States

654 A.2d 867 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1995

Sergeant Vines testified that he then searched the front passenger area of the car on the floor board and found 14 additional bags, eight bags of a brown-white substance and six of a white substance. … Minor v. United States, 294 A.2d 171, 173 (D.C.1972).

Walker v. D.C. Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 2024

Brown v. Watts, 993 A.2d 529, 532 (D.C. 2010). “Substantial evidence is defined as such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. … V; Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v.

Williams v. City Stores Company

192 A.2d 534 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1963

Italian Star Line v. United States Shipping Board E. F. Corporation, 2nd Cir., 53 F.2d 359, 361 , 80 A.L.R. 576 . … Oscanyan v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co., 103 U.S. 261, 263 , 26 L.Ed. 539 ; Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App.D.C. 273 , 25 L.R.A.,N.S., 98.