Case law

Goozh v. Capitol Souvenir Co., Inc.

462 A.2d 1140 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1983

Brown v. Brown, 343 A.2d 59, 61 (D.C.1975) (per curiam). Indeed, “[t]he law favors the settlement of controversies, and a valid and binding agreement of compromise and settlement will be enforced as any other contract.” … State Highway Board, 130 Vt. 317 , 292 A.2d 814 (1972) (damages in condemnation proceedings to be determined as of a time other than the customary date of taking); Hayes v.

SHEILA FARRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD

151 A.3d 490 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 2017

Johnson v. Board of Appeals & Review, 282 A.2d 566, 568 (D.C. 1971). … Given that the contested decision was made by a District of Columbia entity, rather than a federal entity, we share the Board’s initial reaction that review would likely lie in Superior Court. Cf. Brown v.

National Geographic Society v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

721 A.2d 618 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1998

Brown argues that this court should give deference to the agency’s reasonable interpretation of the statute it administers. See Lee v. … Co. v.

Dillard v. Yeldell

334 A.2d 578 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1975

Bollotin v. Workmen Service Co., 128 Cal.App.2d 339 , 275 P.2d 599 (1954); Bragassa v. Bragassa, supra note 5 ; Board of Educ. v. Fowler, supra note 5; Linden v. … Whorton v. Gaspard, supra note 6 ; State v. Groff, supra note 10 ; Keigley v. Bench, supra note 10 . 28 . Board of Pub. Util. Comm’rs v.

Johnson v. United States

613 A.2d 1381 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1992

Jenkins v. … Brown.

Nero v. United States

73 A.3d 153 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 2013

McCoy v. United States, 890 A.2d 204, 216 (D.C.2006). … Matthews v. United States, 892 A.2d 1100, 1106 (D.C.2006). III. CONCLUSION For the reasons discussed herein, appellant’s conviction for felony assault against Mark Brown is reversed.

Keranen v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

743 A.2d 703 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 2000

Brown v. CSX Transp., Inc., 18 F.3d 245, 249 (4th Cir.1994) (quoting Robert v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 832 F.2d 3, 6 (1st Cir.1987)). … Deans, supra, 152 F.3d at 330 (citing Brown, supra, 18 F.3d at 249 ; Hurley v. Patapsco & Back Rivers R.R. Co., 888 F.2d 327, 329 (4th Cir.1989)).

Neighbors for Responsive Government v. DC Bd. of Zoning & DC Dept. of General Services

195 A.3d 35 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 2018

(internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Oakland Condo. v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 22 A.3d 748, 752 (D.C. 2011)). 44 Brown v. … LLC v.

Lee v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

509 A.2d 100 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 1986

Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 4, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792, 805 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Coakley v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 370 A.2d 1345, 1349 (D.C.1977). … United States v. Brown, 422 A.2d 1281, 1284 (D.C. 1980). We must begin our search for the intended change by scrutinizing the plain language of the statute. Peoples Drug Stores v.

Olivarius v. Stanley J. Sarnoff Endowment for Cardiovascular Science, Inc.

858 A.2d 457 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 2004

Marinopoliski v. Irish, 445 A.2d 339, 340 (D.C.1982) (quoting Helvering v. Gowran, 302 U.S. 238, 245 , 58 S.Ct. 154 , 82 L.Ed. 224 (1937)). See Granfinanciera, S.A. v. … See also, e.g., Browning v.

IN RE JUAN LORENZO RODRIGUEZ-QUESADA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 2015

Similarly, the Board must defer to the factual findings of the Hearing Committee if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. See, e.g., In re Brown, 112 A.3d 913, 917 (D.C. 2015) (per curiam). … In re Kline, 11 A.3d 261, 265 (D.C. 2011) (court in disciplinary proceeding did not consider argument that was not briefed and was only raised during oral argument); Bardoff v.

Longus v. United States

52 A.3d 836 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2012

See O’Brien v. … See also Gatlin v.

Howard Univ. Hosp. v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.

200 A.3d 1244 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2019

Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 83 A.3d 739, 743 n.6 (D.C. 2014). … Code § 32–1508 (3)(V).” Brown, 83 A.3d at 743 n.6. In the present case, Mr. Lyles sought a schedule award under D.C. Code § 32- 1508 (3)(A) and (S), which govern the partial loss of use of an arm.

DTLD, LLC v. Power Station Limited Partnership; JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat. Ass'n v. DTLD, LLC, et

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 2026

Jameson v. Brown, 109 F.2d 830, 831 (D.C. Cir. 1939). … Code § 25-313(a), are subject to change and warrant reexamination of the ABC Board’s findings every two years. Gallothom, Inc. v. D.C.

Association for Preservation of 1700 Block of N Street v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

384 A.2d 668 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1978

Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 383 A.2d 7, 9 (1978); Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 283, 285 (1974). … Coakley v. Police and Firemen's Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 370 A.2d 1345, 1347-48 (1977).

Brooks v. United States

717 A.2d 323 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1998

Appellant then reached into "an old refrigerator lying on [its] side" (in the middle of the room) and retrieved a crumpled brown paper bag. … See Brown v. United States, 567 A.2d 426, 427 (D.C.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1037 , 110 S.Ct. 1497 , 108 L.Ed.2d 632 (1990).

In Re Slaughter

929 A.2d 433 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2007

See Nance v. … See Settles v.

Carow v. Bishop

50 A.2d 598 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1946

In Merriam v. … Alley Co. v. Ball, 102 Fla. 1034 , 136 So. 704 ; Hoigard v. Yellow Cab Co., 320 Ill. 317 , 150 N.E. 911 ; Brown v. Schmitz, — Iowa —, 22 N.W. 2d 340 ; Nofree v. Leonard, 327 Ill.App. 143 , 63 N.E.2d 653 ; Windus v.

Wallace & Layne v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2026

See, e.g., Govan v. … See, e.g., Walker v.

Crusade v. Capital Transit Co.

63 A.2d 878 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1949

The high degree of care owed by a common carrier to its passengers extends to them when boarding and alighting. Washington & O. D. R. Co. v. Slyder, 43 App.D.C. 95 ; Great Falls & O. D. R. Co. v. … Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co., 79 U.S.App.D.C. 102 , 143 F.2d 142 ; Simmonds v. Capital Transit Co., 79 U.S. App.D.C. 371, 147 F.2d 570 . Defendant relies heavily on Brown v.