Case law

Brown v. United States

983 A.2d 1023 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2009

When Officer Hoffman repeated her question, appellant reached into her purse and handed the officer a brown pill bottle. Officer Hoffman opened the bottle, and inside it she found three small ziplock bags. … In particular, she relies heavily upon Hawkins v.

Brown v. United States

372 A.2d 557 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1977

NEWMAN, Chief Judge: Appellant, Bradford Brown, convicted by jury of second-degree murder, assault with a dangerous weapon, and carrying a pistol without a license, was sentenced to terms of confinement. … Moore v. Illinois, supra.

Brown v. United States

683 A.2d 118 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1996

Carter v. United States, 614 A.2d 913, 919 (D.C.1992). … Ford, supra, 549 A.2d at 1126 (quoting Rogers v.

United States v. Brown

422 A.2d 1281 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1980

422 A.2d 1281 (1980) UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Willie BROWN, Jr., Appellee. No. 79-1016. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 9, 1980. Decided October 14, 1980. *1282 Richard C. Bicki, Asst. U. S. … United States v.

Brown v. United States

59 A.3d 967 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 2013

Brown.” Shortly after the court gave the instruction, counsel for Brown called the trial court’s attention to this court’s opinion in Crowder v. … Similarly, in Green v.

Brown v. United States

795 A.2d 56 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2002

Brown thus received a total sentence on the armed rape and sodomy charges of twenty-six to seventy-eight years of imprisonment. This court affirmed Brown’s convictions on direct appeal in Brown v. … Neverdon v.

Brown v. United States

384 A.2d 647 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1978

United States v. Jenkins, 525 F.2d 819 (6th Cir. 1975); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463 (4th Cir. 1975); United States v. … United States v. McDaniel, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 60 , 538 F.2d 408 (1976); United States v. Addison, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 498 F.2d 741 (1974); People v.

Brown v. Megabus Ne., LLC

203 A.3d 768 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 2019

Brown v. United States

464 A.2d 120 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1983

Larry Brown said, ‘Why not?’ ” We have no difficulty in concluding that appellant Brown’s statement (“Why not?”) … Brown told him to shut up.” Poston was at that point accusing appellant Brown of a heinous crime.

Brown v. United States

261 A.2d 834 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1970

Lee v. United States, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 156, 157-158 , 221 F.2d 29, 30-31 (1954). See also, Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217, 241 , 80 S.Ct. 683 , 4 L.Ed.2d 668 (1960); Hester v. … Compare United States v. Merritt, 293 F.2d 742 (3rd Cir.1961); Work v. United States, 100 U.S. App.D.C. 237, 243 F.2d 660 (1957); Williams v. United States, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 237 F.2d 789 (1956).

Brown v. United States

881 A.2d 586 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2005

Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 88 (D.C.2004). In general, we have said that “prior consistent statements may not be used to bolster an unimpeached witness.” Daye v. United States, 733 A.2d 321, 325 (D.C.1999). … See, e.g., Brown, 840 A.2d at 88-89 ; Warren, 436 A.2d at 837 ; Morris v. United States, 398 A.2d 333, 338 (D.C.1978).

Brown v. United States

726 A.2d 149 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1999

See, e.g., Murphy v. Bonanno, 663 A.2d 505, 508-509 (D.C.1995); Portillo v. United States, 609 A.2d 687, 690-91 (D.C.1992); Roundtree v. United States, 581 A.2d 315, 321 (D.C.1990); Sherer v. … Brooks v. United States, 683 A.2d 1369, 1371 (D.C.1995). As the trial court found, Brown’s theory, and the support for it, was speculative.

Brown v. United States

952 A.2d 942 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2008

Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 124 (D.C.1996) (quoting Elliott v. United States, 633 A.2d 27, 32 (D.C.1993)). … Brown, supra, 683 A.2d at 124 (quoting Jenkins v. United States, 617 A.2d 529, 531 (D.C.1992)).

Brown v. United States

934 A.2d 930 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2007

McFadden v. … See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 881 A.2d 586, 593 (D.C.2005). Even if we were to assume that it should have been obvious to the trial judge that the instruction was erroneous, see Johnson v.

Brown v. Hines-Williams

2 A.3d 1077 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2010

D.F. v. … Massey v. Evans, 68 A.D.3d 79 , 886 N.Y.S.2d 280 , 284 (N.Y.App.Div.2009) (citing Nebraska ex rel. Hopkins v. Batt, 253 Neb. 852 , 573 N.W.2d 425, 435 (1998); Hautala v.

Brown v. Pearson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2020

Saul Co. v. … (quoting Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 74 (1972))); Mahdi v.

Brown v. United States

619 A.2d 1180 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1992

The court did instruct the jury that in its determination it might take into account that appellant Brown was entitled to mitigation. … Comber v.

Brown v. United States

40 A.2d 832 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1945

Whiting v. Fibber and Mollie Tea Room, 154 Pa.Super. 106 , 35 A.2d 598, 600 . State v. Andrews, 130 Iowa 609 , 105 N.W. 215, 216 . People v. Marrs, 125 Mich. 376 , 84 N. W. 284, 285 . … Bush, 56 Cal.App.2d 877 , 133 P.2d 870 ; People v. Baker, 251 Mich. 322 , 232 N.W. 381 ; People v. Gage, 62 Mich. 271 , 28 N.W. 835 , 4 Am.St.Rep. 854 ; Kenney v.

Brown v. United States

289 A.2d 891 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1972

See the concurring opinion of Judge Nebeker in District of Columbia v. Faison, D.C.App., 278 A.2d 688 (1971). … Jenkins v. United States, D.C.App., 284 A.2d 460, 464 (1971). Affirmed. 1 . Cf. Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure which contains a similar clause.

Brown v. United States

864 A.2d 996 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 2005

Hackes, 446 A.2d 396, 398 (D.C.1982)); accord, Brown v. … See Brown v. United States, 589 A.2d 434, 436 (D.C.1991).