Case law

Kern-Liebers USA, Inc. v. United States

19 Ct. Int'l Trade 87 · United States Court of International Trade · Jan 27, 1995

The statute and case law clearly contemplate that it is within the Commission’s discretion to cumulate for purposes of threat analysis. … Id. at 386. *105 Petitioners contend that the record clearly contradicts Commissioner Nuzum’s finding that the volumes of underselling imports were “extremely small.”

Dorbest Ltd. v. United Stat

2008 CIT 24 · United States Court of International Trade · Feb 27, 2008

Commerce’s determination was unreasonable, Dorbest presents its analysis showing that there is a relationship between company size (as measured by cost of manufacture31) and SG&A ratio, which is more clearly … Cir. 1997)(deciding under the 1988 version of the antidumping law that “[i]nformation that has conclusively been determined to be inaccurate does not qualify as the ‘best information’ under any test