Case law

Brown v. Oregon King Min. Co.

110 F. 728 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Aug 9, 1901

If Brown had failed to comply with the law, and the property was at the time subject to location, it was wholly immaterial whether Wilson knew of Brown’s prior claim. He might lawfully locate a claim himself. … He was not seeking to acquire the claim in violation of Brown’s right, since it is conceded that Brown at the time had no right.

De Laittre v. Board of Com'rs

149 F. 800 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Jan 14, 1907

See Robertson v. State Land Board, 42 Or. 183 , 70 Pac. 614 , Miller v. Wattier, 44 Or. 347 , 75 Pac. 209 , and Robertson v. Low, 44 Or. 587 , 77 Pac. 744 . … in the case of Parsons v.

United States v. Ellis

122 F. 1016 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · May 12, 1903

Ellis, and other like cases, I expressed the opinion that the rule adopted by Judge Deady in United States v. Ball (C. C.) 31 Fed. 667 , did not apply upon the case so stated. The rule laid down in United States v. … Brown and one Fred Tietgen. Brown and Tietgen were homesteaders at the time.

Mickey v. Stratton

17 F. Cas. 268 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · May 5, 1879

Tyler, Ej. 73; Day v. Alverson, 9 Wend. 233 ; Hutchinson v. Perley, 4 Cal. 34 ; Hicks v. Davis, Id. 69 ; Winans v. Christy, Id. 78 ; Bequette v. Caulfield, Id. 278; Marshall v. Shafter, 32 Cal. 194 ; Turner v. … This rule is also maintained in Eagle Woolen Mills Co. v. Monteith, 2 Or. 282 ; Brown v. Brown, 45 Mo. 414 ; Fellows v Wise, 49 Mo. 352 ; Butcher v. Bogers, 60 Mo. 140 ; Ames v. Beckley, 48 Vt. 395 ; 2 Greenl.

Fitzpatrick v. Dubois

9 F. Cas. 193 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · May 26, 1873

1S55 and 1856, as follows: Hall of one hundred acres; Smith of one hundred and seventy acres, and Brown of fifty acres. … In Chapman v. School Dist.

Stufflebeam v. De Lashmutt

101 F. 367 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Apr 27, 1900

In the case of Bank v. … In the case of Langtry v.

Stufflebeam v. De Lashmutt

83 F. 449 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Nov 18, 1897

assigned, to Brown. … In Waite v. Dowley, 94 U.

Kerns v. Lee

142 F. 985 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Jan 22, 1906

Stark v. Starr, 6 Wall. 402 , 18 L. Ed. 925 ; Silver v. Ladd, 7 Wall. 219 , 19 L. Ed. 138 ; Johnson v. Towslev, 13 Wall. 72 , 20 L. Ed. 485 . … Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. Rust, 168 U. S. 589 , 18 Sup. Ct. 208, 42 L. Ed. 591 ; Brown v. Hitchcock, 173 U. S. 473 , 19 Sup. Ct. 485, 43 L. Ed. 772 .

California & O. Land Co. v. Gowen

48 F. 771 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Jan 4, 1892

Hersey v. Board, 37 Wis. 75 ; Merrill v. Humphrey, 24 Mich. 170 ; Railway Co. v. Cole, 75 Ill. 591 ; Dundee v. Parrish, 11 Sawy. 92 , 24 Fed. Rep. 197; Balfour v. Portland, 12 Sawy. 122 , 28 Fed. Rep. 738. … In support of this position he cites Railway Co. v. Hodges, 113 Ill. 323 ; Bank v. Board, 25 N. Y. 312 ; Railway Co. v. Board, 48 N. Y. 513 .

Altschul v. Gittings

86 F. 200 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Apr 1, 1898

It was held in this court in the case of Investment Co. v. … Railroad Co. v. Patterson, 154 U. S. 130 , 14 Sup. Ct. 977. In the case of Association v.

McConnaughy v. Pennoyer

43 F. 196 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Jul 28, 1890

In Allan v. … S. v. Moore, 95 U. S. 763 ; Scanlan v. Childs, 33 Wis. 666 ; Westbrook v. Miller, 56 Mich. 151 , 22 N. W. Rep. 256 .

United States v. Grant

55 F. 414 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Mar 1, 1893

From there one of the men went into the country back of Astoria, where he remained about two weeks, and then returned to the defendant’s boarding house, where he remained until January 4, 3893. … Van Metre v. Mitchell, 2 Wall. Jr. 311 ; Driskill v. Parish, 3 McLean, 631 ; Eels v. People, 4 Scam. 498 .

United States v. Sullivan

43 F. 602 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Oct 8, 1890

S. v. … S. v.

Nevada Bank v. Portland Nat. Bank

59 F. 338 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Dec 23, 1893

In Boyd’s Ex’rs v. Browne, 6 Pa. St. 310, the representation was that the party seeking credit was “a sober, industrious man, worthy of credit, and able to pay,” and was held sufficient to sustain the action. … In Ewins v. Calhoun, 7 Vt. 79 , and Weeks v.

In re Kelly

46 F. 653 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Nov 10, 1890

In Hadden v. People, 25 N. … Kelly introduced these men to the master of the Noddleburn, who was on board, and they went on board, apparently of their own free will.

In re St. Helen Mill Co.

21 F. Cas. 161 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Aug 19, 1875

Richardson v. Scott R. Co., 22 Cal. 156 . … Carr v. Hilton [Case No. 2,436]; Brock v. Terrel [Id. 1, 914]; In re Wynne [Id. 18,117]; Allen v. Massey [Id. 231).

Standard Varnish Works v. Fisher, Thorsen & Co.

153 F. 928 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · May 13, 1907

Justice Strong, in the case of Canal Company v. Clark, 13 Wall. 311, 323 , 20 L. … Justice Brown announces the same principle in the case of Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U. S. 540 , 11 Sup. Ct. 625, 35 L.

Pacific Bridge Co. v. Clackamas County

45 F. 217 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Feb 16, 1891

Section 3 of this act provides, in effect, as was held in Milling Co. v. … The phrase “board of county commissioners ” is, in legal effect, a blank.

Raftery v. The T. F. Oakes

36 F. 442 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Oct 18, 1888

The master “was compelled to hire men from shore to unload the coal, of which there were 8,000 tons on board. … Hutchinson v. Coombs, 1 Ware, 70 ; 2 Pars. Shipp. & Adm. 80.

Caldwell v. School Dist. No. 7 of Lake County

55 F. 372 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Mar 1, 1893

It is contended on behalf of the defendant that the school directors have not power to enter into a contract extending *373 further Into the future than ike term for which all the members of the board hold their office. … Gates v. School Dist., (Ark.) 14 S. W. Rep. 656 ; Renbelt v. School Town, 106 fed. 480, 7 N. E.