Case law

Gear v. Grosvenor

10 F. Cas. 130 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Mar 11, 1873

Co. v. Stimpson, 14 Pet. [39 U. S.] 458; Seymour v. Osborne, 11 Wall. [78 U. S.] 543; Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 9 Wall. [76 U. S.] 797; Stimpson v. West Chester R. Co., 4 How. [45 U. S.] 384. … Wilson v. Rousseau, 4 How. [45 U. S.] 646; Bloomer v. McQuewan, 14 How. [55 U. S.] 539; Clum v. Brewer [Case No. 2,909].

United States v. Ames

24 F. Cas. 784 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1845

Power Co. v. Gray, 6 Metc. (Mass.) 131; Kyd. Awards, 351; Jones v. Frazier, 1 Hawks, 379 ; Greenough v. Rolfe, 4 N. H. 357. … And also its liability to a general average, when having property on board a vessel where a loss occurs, to save the cargo. U. S. v. Wilder [Id. 16,694], So in respect to alluvion, or land deposits. New Orleans v. U.

Maddux v. Usher

16 F. Cas. 362 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1878

In Freeman v. … Freeman v.

United States v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co.

176 F. 963 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Mar 10, 1910

Ware v. U. S., 4 Wall. 617, 632 , 18 L. Ed. 389 . … It is said in Kohl v. U. S., 91 U. S. 367, 372 , 23 L.

Western Union Tel. Co. v. American Bell Tel. Co.

105 F. 684 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Dec 21, 1900

Nash v. Towne, 5 Wall. 689, 699 , 18 L. Ed. 527 ; Canal Co. v. Hill, 15 Wall. 94, 100 , 21 L. Ed. 64 ; Moran v. Prather, 23 Wall. 492, 501 , 23 L. Ed. 121 ; Reed v. Insurance Co., 95 U. S. 23 . 30, 24 L. … Ed. 93 ; Sargent v. Adams, 3 Gray, 72 ; Stoops v. Smith, 100 Mass. 63, 68 ; Fuller v. Miller, 105 Mass. 103 ; Keller v. Webb, 125 Mass. 88, 89 ; Bassett v. Rogers, 162 Mass. 47, 51 , 37 N. E. 772 ; Machine Co. v.

Jelison v. Lee

13 F. Cas. 437 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1847

See Weston v. Minot (at this term) [Case No. 17.453]. … Smith v. Shaw [Case No. 13,107; Lanusse v. Barker], 3 Wheat. [16 U. S.] 101; 3 Johns. Ch. 587 ; 17 Johns. 511 .

Beach v. Hobbs

82 F. 916 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 23, 1897

In Edgarton v. Manufacturing Co., 9 Fed. 450 , the court, being asked to apply decisions in several eases to a pending patent cause, said as follows: ‘But the proofs in Brown v. Whittemore [ 5 Fish. Pat. Cas. 524 ; Fed. … In McCloskey v.

The Johns Hopkins

13 F. 185 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 14, 1882

The Colorado, 1 Brown, Adm. 393 , ( 91 U. S. 692 ,) is relied on by the libelants. … S. 77 ; Johnson v. Stark Co. 24 Ill. 75 ; Brush v. Reeves, 3 Johns. 439 ; Dean v. Hall, 17 Wend. 214 ; Cox v. United States, 6 Pet. 200 ; Andrews v. Pond, 13 Pet. 77 ; Bell v. *192 Bruen, 1 How. 169 ; People v.

Foster v. Swasey

9 F. Cas. 579 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1846

See cases in Pierpont v. … Why should the defendant want to sell it for boards, if it was good ? He was a grocer and a man of substance, and could well wait till it became due, rather than take lumber. Secondly.

Morrison v. Price

23 F. 217 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Mar 14, 1885

Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U. S. 45 ; Sanger v. Upton , Id. 56 ; Chubb v. Upton, 95 U. S. 665 . … Chubb v. Upton, Upton v. Tribilcock, and Sanger v. Upton, supra; Ogilrie v. Knox Ins. Co. 22 How. 380 .

United States v. Potter

56 F. 83 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 29, 1892

S. v. Carll, ubi supra. … S. v. Britton, 108 U. S. 192 , 2 Sup. Ct.

Graham v. Boston, H. & E. R.

14 F. 753 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jan 15, 1883

S. v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 611 ; Metcalf v. Williams, 104 U. S. 93 . In Nougue v. Clapp, 101 U. … Morgan v. Thornhill, 11 Wall. 65 ; Smith v. Mason, 14 Wall. 419 ; Sandusky v. Nat. Bank, 23 Wall. 289 ; New Lamp Chimney Co. v. Brass & Copper Co. 91 U. S. 656 ; Sanger v. *762 Upton, 91 U. S. 56 ; Milner v. Meeh, 95 U.

Jenkins v. Eldredge

13 F. Cas. 462 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1844

Cripps v. Jee, 4 Brown, Ch. 472, is equally strong to the same purpose. … See Dundas v. Dutens, 1 Ves. Jr. 196, 199, 2 Cox, 233; Redding v. Wilkes, 3 Brown, Ch. 400, 401; Taylor v. Beech, 1 Ves. Sr. 297, 298.

General Electric Co. v. Smith

170 F. 593 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jun 11, 1909

Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Machine Co. et al. (U. S. Sup. Ct., April 19, 1909). … Co. v. Mechanical Accounting Co. (C. C.) 129 Fed. 386 .

Malignani v. Jasper Marsh Consol. Electric Lamp Co.

180 F. 442 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jul 19, 1910

BROWN, District Judge. The patent to Malignani, No. 537,693,.. dated April 16, 1895, is for a process for evacuating incandescent lamps. … In Malignani v. Hill-Wright Co. (C.

Day v. Buffinton

7 F. Cas. 222 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1871

McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat [17 U. S.] 429; Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. [25 U. S.] 448. … Fifield v. Close, 15 Mich. 505 ; Warren v. Paul, 22 Ind. 279 ; Jones v. Keep’s Estate, 19 Wis. 369 ; Union Bank v. Hill, 3 Cold. 325 . [NOTE.

Wyman v. Babcock

30 F. Cas. 741 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1855

White v. Pigion, Toth. 135; Palmer v. Jackson, 5 Brown, Parl. Cas. 281; Orde v. Heming, 1 Vern. 418; Yates v. Hambly, 2 Atk. 359. … Gordon v. Lewis [Case No. 5,613]; Baker v.

Shelton v. Austin

21 F. Cas. 1247 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1860

Belcher v. Linn, 24 How. [65 U. S.] 522; Rankin v. Hoyt, 4 How. [45 U. S.] 327; Stairr v. Peaslee, 18 How. [ 59 U. S. 524 . … Whenever a vessel arrives from a j foreign port having merchandise on board which is subject to duty, it is incumbent on the master in every case to present his manifest, and notify the collector of the arrival of the vessel

Blake & Knowles Steam Pump Works v. Warren Steam Pump Co.

155 F. 285 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 2, 1907

BROWN, District Judge. … Forsyth v. Garlock, 142 Fed. 461 , 73 C. C. A. 577 ; Watson v. Stevens, 51 Fed. 757 , 2 C. C. A. 200 ; Davey Pegging Machine Co. v. Isaac Prouty & Co., 107 Fed. 505, 509 ,, 46 C. C.

Cunningham v. Bell

6 F. Cas. 961 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1828

It is in the next place contended by the defendants, that the 5000 reams of paper having been received on board the Halcyon, and carried to the Havana, and sold there on the plaintiffs’ account, that receipt and sale amount … Bell v. Cunningham, 3 Ret. (28 U. S.) CD.