Case law

Tower v. Bemis & Call Hardware & Tool Co.

19 F. 498 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Feb 28, 1884

Board-man put into the claw of Park’s hammer a serrated piece of steel, called “the cam, n,” which had a rocking motion, and he made a notch in the hammer opposite the cam, and in this way the claw and hammer formed a pipe-wrench … Hailes v. Van Wormer, 20 Wall. 353 ; Reckendorfer v. Faber, 92 U. S. 347 ; Pickering v. McCullough, 104 U. S. 310 ; Packing Co. Cases, 105 U. S. 566 .

Barnard v. Morton

2 F. Cas. 837 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1853

Greely v. Thompson, 10 How. [51 U. S.] 225; Maxwell v. Griswold, Id. 242. … Morlot v. Lawrence, [Id. 9,815;] Norcross v. Greely, [Id. 10,294.]

Taylor v. Carpenter

23 F. Cas. 744 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1846

See Craig v. Brown [Case No. 3,328]; [Ferguson v. Harwood] 7 Cranch [11 U. S.] 408; [Mills v. Duryee] Id. 481; [Drummond v. Magruder] 9 Cranch [13 U. S.] 122; [Hampton v. M’Connel] 3 Wheat. [16 U. S.] 234. … But it would be a mockery of such provisions and. engagements, if we prevented them from selling their goods after arriving here (Chief Justice Marshall in Brown v. Maryland 12 Wheat. [25 U.

Parkhurst v. Kinsman

18 F. Cas. 1207 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1847

Evans v. Foster, 1 N. H. 374, and cases cited; 2 Chit. Gen. Prac. 370; Craig v. Brown [Case No. 3,328]. … Prac. 74; Rabaud v. D’Wolf [Case No. 11,-519]; Catlett v. Pacific Ins. Co. [Id. 2,517]; [Wood v. Wagnon] 2 Cranch [6 U. S.] 9; [Capron v. Van Noorden] Id. 126.

American Bell Tel. Co. v. National Tel. Mfg. Co.

109 F. 976 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jun 24, 1901

BROWN, District Judge. The decree in these cases must be for the defendants. A. I find the Berliner patent invalid: 1. … permitting amendment bound the board, and reversed the examiner.

Kelley v. Cunard S. S. Co.

120 F. 536 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jan 6, 1903

Schuchardt v. Allens, 1 Wall. 359, 369 , 17 L. Ed. 642 ; Railroad Co. v. Moore, 121 U. S. 558, 569 , 7 Sup. Ct. 1334, 30 L. Ed. 1022 ; Sparf v. U. S., 156 U. S. 51, 99, 100 , 15 Sup. Ct. 273, 39 L. Ed. 343 ; Coughran v. … Ed. 442 ; Rainger v. Association, 167 Mass. 109, 110 , 44 N. E. 1088 . The defendant’s motion for a new trial is denied. Note by the Court: Harrowing v.

Bradley v. Farwell

3 F. Cas. 1146 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1874

Butts v. Wood, 38 Barb. 188 ; York & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Hudson. 19 Eng. Law & Eq. 365, 16 Beav. 485; Scott v. Depeyster, 1 Edw. Ch. 513 ; Verplank v. Mercantile Ins. Co., 1 Edw. Ch. 85 ; Great Luxembourg Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Poor, 59 Me. 277 ; Benson v. Heathorn, 1 Younge & C. Ch. 343; Sawyer v. Hoag, 17 Wall. [84 U. S.] 610; Aberdeen Ry. Co. v. Blakie, 1 Macq. 461.

Rowe v. The Brig

20 F. Cas. 1281 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1818

S.] 188; Mason v. The Blaireau, 2 Cranch [6 U. S.] 240; The Adventure, 8 Cranch [12 U. S.] 226. … But even these facts are not established; for no papers or persons were found on board, so that there is a total absence of the usual proofs.

Hovey v. Stevens

12 F. Cas. 609 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1846

See Whittemore v. Cutter [supra]; Lowell v. Lewis [supra]; Evans v. Eaton [Case No. 4,560]; Sullivan v. Redfield [Id. 13,597]. Again, in respect to the present application. … In Orr v.

Allen v. Blunt

1 F. Cas. 450 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1846

H. 369; [Bunce v. Wolcott,] 2 Conn. 31 ; [Jewett v. Stevens,] 6 N. H. 80, sed quaere; [Prince v. Shepard,] 9 Pick. 176 . Or if no injustice appears to have been done by it. Brown v. Wilde, 12 Johns. 455 ; [Den. v. … . & P. 338, and note; [Robinson v. Cook,] 6 Taunt. 336; [Springer v. Rowdoinham,] 7 Greenl. 442; [Haynes v. Jenks,] 2 Pick. 177 ; [Baylies v. Davis,] 1 Pick. 206 ; [Hoyt v. Dimon,] 5 Day. 479 ; [Brown v.

Blagge v. Miles

3 F. Cas. 559 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1841

The case of Rice v. … Powers (6th Ed.) c. 6, § 7, arts. 32, 33, pp. 393, 394; Andrews v. Emmot, 2 Brown, Ch. 297; Standen v. Standen, 2 Ves. Jr. 594; Doe v. Roake, 2 Bing. 497, 510; Jones v. Curry, 1 Swanst. 66, 71, 72.

Bowditch v. Boston

3 F. Cas. 1038 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1876

Jewell v. Parr, 13 C. B. 916; Toomey v. London, B. & S. C. Ry. Co., 3 C. B. (N. S.) 150; Wheelton v. Hardisty, 8 El. & Bl. 266; Schuchardt v. Allens, 1 Wall. [68 U. S.] 369; Merchants’ Bank v. … Leffingwell v. Warren, 2 Black [67 U. S.] 603; Loring v. Marsh [Case No. 8,514]; McKeen v. Delaney, 5 Cranch [9 U. S.] 22.

Combustion Utilities Corp. v. Worcester Gaslight Co.

190 F. 155 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 8, 1911

BROWN, District Judge. The bill charges infringement of two letters patent to Henry L. … Diamond Rubber Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Co., supra.

Towne v. Smith

24 F. Cas. 93 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Apr 15, 1846

Brown, 5 East, 124, a bill of exchange was drawn in the United States in favor of a‘ citizen of the United States, though on a drawee in England, not accepted, and afterwards the drawer was sued in England; the action was … [Millar v. Hall] 1 Dall. [1 U. S.] 229; [Emory v. Greenough] 3 Dall. [3 U. S.] 369; 3 Caines, 154 ; 2 Johns. 198 , 235; Hicks v. Brown, 12 Johns. 142 .

United States v. La Coste

26 F. Cas. 826 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1820

Pl. 235; Rex v. Redman, 2 Leach, 536; Rex v. Morris, 1 Leach, 109. … And if the case of Rex v.

Carew v. Boston Elastic Fabric Co.

5 F. Cas. 49 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1871

Co., Case No. 7.882; Matthews v. Boston Machine Co.. 105 U. S. 54 : Putnam v. Yerrington. Case No. 11,486; Hammond v. Franklin. 22 Fed. 833 : Brown v. Selby. Case No. 2.030; Heald v. Rice. 104 U. … Taggert, Id. 1,107; Campbell v. James, Id. 2.361; Cammeyer v. Newton, Id. 2.344: Goodyear v. Berry. Id. 5.556: CornPlanter Patent, 23 Wall. (90 U. S.) 181; Tarr v. Webb. Case No. 13.757: Meyer v.

Colt's Patent Firearms Mfg. Co. v. Wesson

122 F. 90 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Apr 21, 1903

In Western Electric Co. v. La Rue, 139 U. S. 601 , 11 Sup. Ct. 670, 35 L. … R. v. Truck Co., 110 U. S. 490 , 4 Sup. Ct. 220, 28 L. Ed. 222 .

Maisonnaire v. Keating

16 F. Cas. 513 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1815

Ricord v. Bettenham, 3 Burrows, 1734, 1 W. Bl. 563: Cornu v. Blackburne, Doug. 641; and Anthon v. Fisher, Id. 649, note 1. In all these cases, the action was brought directly on the ransom bill in a court of common law. … Camden v. Home, 4 Term R. 382; Duckworth v. Tucker, 2 Taunt. 6.

United States v. Ames

24 F. Cas. 784 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1845

Power Co. v. Gray, 6 Metc. (Mass.) 131; Kyd. Awards, 351; Jones v. Frazier, 1 Hawks, 379 ; Greenough v. Rolfe, 4 N. H. 357. … And also its liability to a general average, when having property on board a vessel where a loss occurs, to save the cargo. U. S. v. Wilder [Id. 16,694], So in respect to alluvion, or land deposits. New Orleans v. U.

Adams v. Blodgett

1 F. Cas. 86 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1846

[Bradford v. Tappan.] 11 Pick. 78 ; [Borden v. Sumner,] 4 Pick. 265 ; [Andrews v. Ludlow,] 5 Pick. 28 ; [Widgery v. Haskell,] 5 Mass. 144 ; Jewett v. Barnard, 6 Greenl. 385; [Com. v. … [Copeland v. Weld,] 8 Greenl. 414; [Brown v. Minturn, Case No. 2,-021;] [Scribner v. Hickok.] 4 Johns. Ch. 531 . See, also, Foster v. Saco Manuf’g Co., 12 Pick. 451 , 454, in point as to the present case.