Case law

The Joseph

13 F. Cas. 1126 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1813

See Lindo v. Rodney, Doug. 613, note; Thorshaven, 1 Edw. Adm. 102. … Adm. 190. in which last ease, and in Potts v. Bell, the other cited cases will be found.

The Lively

15 F. Cas. 631 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1812

Murray v. The Charming Betsey, 2 Cranch *634 [6 U. S.] 64; Maley v. Shattuck, 3 Cranch [7 U. S.] 458. And a rule substantially the same was adopted in a case marked with great impropriety, — Del Col. v. … In Le Caux v.

D'Wolf v. Harris

8 F. Cas. 193 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1827

Bartlett v. Williams. 1 Pick. 288 ; Badlam v. Tucker, Id. 389; Dawes v. Cope, 4 Bin. 238 . See Hart v. Fitzgerald, 2 Mass. 509 : Portland Bank v. Stubbs, 6 Mass. 422 : Gardner v. Dutch, 9 Mass. 427 ; Page v. … Weeks, 13 Mass. 199 ; Ladd v. Billings, 15 Mass. 15 .

Hovey v. Stevens

12 F. Cas. 615 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1846

See Davoll v.. Brown [Id. 3,662], and cases cited therein. … See Davoll v. Brown [supra].

Pitman v. Hooper

19 F. Cas. 737 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1838

It is sufficient to refer to the cases of Hooper v. Perley, 11 Mass. 545 ; Locke v. Swan, 13 Mass. 76 ; Swift v. Clarke. 15 Mass. 173 ; and Moore v. Jones, 15 Mass. 424 . … There is a dictum in Campion v.

Hendey Machine Co. v. Prentice Bros.

155 F. 133 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 2, 1907

BROWN, District Judge. This suit is for infringement of claims 2 to 7, inclusive, of letters patent No. 470,591, granted March 8, 1892, to Wendell P. Norton, for feed mechanism for screw cutting lathes. … McClain v. Ortmayer, 141 U. S. 419 , 12 Sup. Ct. 76, 35 L. Ed. 800 ; Groth v. Supply Co., 9 C. C. A. 507 , 61 Fed. 284 .

Foster Hose Supporter Co. v. O'Brien

153 F. 585 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 7, 1907

BROWN, District Judge. This suit is for infringement of letters patent No. 638,540, granted December 5, 1899, on an application filed October 19, 1897, by Ella Foster Young. … Judge Coxe, in Young v. Wolfe (C.

Wood v. Mann

30 F. Cas. 451 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1836

Lord Arundell v. Pitt, Amb. 585; Perry v. Silves-ter, Jac. 83; Curre v. Bowyer, 3 Swanst. 357; Sandford v. Paul, 3 Brown, Ch. 370; s. c. 1 Ves. Jr. 398, 2 Dickens, 750; Spence v. Allen, Finch, Prec. 493; Shaw v. … Lindsey, 15 Ves. 380; Cox v. Allingham, Jac. 337, 341, 343;. Callow v. Mince, 2 Vern. 472. In the case of Sandford v. Paul, 2 Dickens, 750, 3 Brown, Ch. 370, and 1 Ves. Jr. 398, it appears from Mr.

Avery v. Boston Safe-Deposit & Trust Co.

72 F. 700 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jan 30, 1896

Brown and Samuel G. … For, notwithstanding whatever effect may be given to Relíe v.

Ex parte Pollard

19 F. Cas. 942 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jul 15, 1875

See Beckham v. Drake, 2 H. L. Cas. 645; Emmens v. Elderton, 4 H. L. Cas. 624; Cort v. Ambergate N. & B. & E. J. Ry. Co., 17 Q. B. 127; Hochster v. De la Tour, 2 El. & Bl. 678; Grove v. Donaldson, 15 Pa. … Riggin v. Magwire, 15 Wall. [82 U. S.] 549.

Coffin v. Shaw

5 F. Cas. 1200 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1856

This libel was filed to recover the share or lay of the minor son of the libellant, earned in a whaling voyage on board the ship Alabama. … In Vent v.

Coy v. Perkins

13 F. 111 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 3, 1882

C. 79, or where the plaintiff discontinues, after the court has substantially decided the merits of the case, either by an opinion expressed at the hearing upon the merits, as in the case of The Bay City, before Judge Brown … Schmieder v. Barney, 7 Fed. Rep. 451. Strafer v. Carr, 6 Fed. Rep. 466. Goodyear D. V. Co. v. Osgood, 13 O. G. 325 . Goodyear D. V. Co. v. Osgood, 13 O. G. 325 . Goodyear D. V. Co. v. Osgood, 13 O. G. 325 .

Powell v. Monson & Brimfield Manuf'g Co.

19 F. Cas. 1228 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1824

Dixon v. Saville, 1 Brown, Ch. 323; D’Arcy v. Blake, 2 Schoales & L. 387; Titus v. Neilson, 5 Johns. Ch. 453 , 454. … Groton v. Roxborough, 6 Mass. 50 ; Willington v. Gale, 7 Mass. 138 ; Goodwin v. Richardson, 11 Mass. 469 ; Wilder v. Houghton, 1 Pick. 88 .

Lawrence v. Dana

15 F. Cas. 26 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Sep 20, 1869

Copyr. 255; Murray v. Bogue, 1 Drew. 367; Spiers v. Brown, 6 Wkly. Rep. 353. … Kelly v. Morris, L. R. 1 Eq. 701; Carnan v. Bowles, 2 Brown, Ch. 80; Curt. Copyr. 325.

In re Sheazle

21 F. Cas. 1214 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1845

Sullivan v. Bridge, 1 Mass. 511 ; Brown v. Cuming, 2 Caines, 33 ; Ward v. Jenkins, 10 Metc. [Mass.] 583. … S. v.

In re Certain Merchandise

64 F. 577 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Nov 23, 1894

This is a petition for review of the questions of law and fact involved in the decision of the board of United látales general appraisers in respect to a duty imposed upon an importation from Germany by C. F. … Section 397 is a designation of articles by special description (Barber v. Schell, 107 C. S. 617, 2 Sup. Ct. 301), and it would seem that the article of import is plainly within such description.

Robinson v. Commonwealth Ins.

20 F. Cas. 1002 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1838

If the schooner had arrived at the port of destination, with the cargo on board, physically in existence, the plaintiff *1004 would not have been entitled to recover, however great the damage might have been by a peril insured … Co., 9 Pick. 466 ; Hayman v. Molton, 5 Esp. 65; Idle v. Royal Exch. Assur. Co., 3 Moore, 145, 148, 8 Taunt. 755; Green v. Royal Exch. Assur. Co., 6 Taunt. 68; Read v. Bonham, 3 Brod. & B. 147; Robertson v.

Roberts v. United States

178 F. 607 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Mar 30, 1910

Dutilh v. Maxwell, 2 Blatchf. 543 , Fed. Cas. No. 4,207. … See also, to the same effect, United States v. Brewer, 93 Fed. 341, 342 , 34 C. C. A. 390 . Upon this ground the decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Locke v. Postmaster General

15 F. Cas. 736 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1824

In Nisbet v. … S. v. Kirkpatrick [supra].

Ohl v. Eagle Ins.

18 F. Cas. 630 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1827

The ship sailed on the voyage insured. with every document on board, proving a joint title in Ohl (the plaintiff i and *631 Remington, the master. … In the case of Lamb v.