Case law

Forty Sacks of Wool

14 F. 643 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Dec 20, 1882

Dows v. Nat. Exch. Bank, 91 U. S. 618 ; Jenkins v. Brown, 14 Q. B. 496; Newcomb v. Boston & L. R. Co. 115 Mass. 230 , and two cases immediately preceding and two following that case in the report; Shepherd v.

United States v. Leonard

100 F. 288 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1900

In Movius v. U. S. (C. … S. v. Wells, above cited.

United States v. Lockman

26 F. Cas. 988 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jul 1, 1848

S. v. Johns [Case No. 15,481], being upon the same words, should be held to apply to this point. … It is enough that the prisoner wanted employment, and went on board the ship as one of her crew, so that he belongs to her.

Crosby v. Folger

6 F. Cas. 877 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1833

THE COURT, upon the authority of Mason v. Waite, 1 Pick. 452 , directed several costs to be allowed to the defendants. … See Brown v. Stearns, 13 Mass. 536 .

Aylward v. Smith

2 F. Cas. 274 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Dec 15, 1872

voyage of this kind is usually considered to be ended, as between the ship-owner and the freighter, when the ship has arrived at the place of discharge, such as the public dock, although not able to get a berth immediately: Brown … v.

The Despatch

7 F. Cas. 536 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1813

Vide Duckworth v. Tucker, 2 Taunt 7. In the manner of estimating the relative strength a great diversity of regulation exists. … This relative strength is to be measured, as has been settled by solemn ad *537 judications at the cockpit and in the king’s bench, by the number of men on board each «hip. Roberts v. Hartley, 1 Doug. 311 .

Pope v. The R. B. Forbes

19 F. Cas. 1036 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1859

In Williams v. Hill, 19 How. [60 U. … Law & Eq. 474; Smith v. Condry, 1 How. [42 U. S.] 28; Beane v. The Mayurka [Case No. 1,175]; Fletcher v. Braddick, 2 Bos. & P. [N. R.] 182; The Neptune, 1 Dod. 467.

United States v. Gardner

25 F. Cas. 1258 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1829

combination by the crew, for a common and illegal object, and they refused obedience to the lawful orders of the master, and incited each other to persist in that disobedience, so as to overthrow his authority and command on board … S. v. Harris [Case No. 15,313], which iias just been tried. Verdict guilty, and sentence accordingly.

The Three Brothers

23 F. Cas. 1162 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1812

These articles, (which altogether were of less value than $400) were taken on board at Cyrus Harbor, on the Labrador shore, to which place vessels employed in the fisheries usually resort in the course of their voyages, and … S. v. The Active (in the supreme court) 7 Cranch [11 U.

In re Wetherell

60 F. 267 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Mar 10, 1894

This is a petition praying for a review of a decision of the board .of general appraisers, assessing, on several lots of steel imported into the port of Boston by the petitioner, a duty of 50 per centum ad valorem, under … Twine Co. v. Worthington, 141 U. S. 468, 474 , 12 Sup. Ct. 55; U, S. v. Isham, 17 Wall. 496 ; Hartranft v. Wiegmann, 121 U. S. 609 , 7 Sup. Ct. 1240; Gurr v. Scudds, 11 Exch. 190.

In re Reed

20 F. Cas. 409 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jun 12, 1879

It appears by the return of the writ, and the other evidence, that a naval general court-martial was convened on board the United States ship Essex, in the harbor of Rio Janeiro, on the first day of July, 1S7S, by order of … S. v. Bogart [Case No. 14.0101. — -and by the circuit court of the *415 United States for tlie Nintli circuit, — Bogart's Case [Id. 1,596].

Conners v. United States

130 F. 609 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jun 3, 1904

Therefore in no event can it be said that there has been any ascertainment by any board of naval officers or any other board which reaches this case. … This exception to the general rule has been stated by the Supreme Court in its most substantial phases in Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. March, 114 U. S. 549 , 5 Sup. Ct. 1035, 29 L.

Warner v. Daniels

29 F. Cas. 246 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1845

Jur. § 190; Rosevelt v. Dale, 2 Cow. 129 ; Neville v. Wilkinson, 1 Brown. Ch. 543. 546. … . § 193; Ainslie v. Medlycott, 9 Ves. 13, 21; Graves v. White, Freem. 57; Pearson v. Morgan, 2 Brown, Ch. 388; Shackelford v. Hendley. 1 A. K. Marsh. 500.

In re Claflin

113 F. 944 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Feb 10, 1902

The case then went to the board of general appraisers for decision. … S. v. Salambier, 170 U. S. 621, 626 , 18 Sup. Ct. 771, 42 L. Ed. 1167 , and cases cited. In U. S. v.

United States v. Hewson

26 F. Cas. 303 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Nov 15, 1844

The counsel referred to Hosea v. Buchanan, 10 Pet. [41 U. S.] 215. The point taken by the counsel respecting the ownership of the vessel was this. … The counsel referred to Hozey v. Buchanan, 1C Pet. 215. The point taken by the counsel respecting the ownership of the vessel was this.

United States v. Boyden

24 F. Cas. 1213 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jul 15, 1868

Rex v. Salisbury, 5 Car. & P. 155; Rex v. Brown, cited Russ. & R. 32, note a, and more fully, 2 Russ. Crimes (4th Ed.) 570. So 7 & 8 Geo. … Russ. & R. 378; State v. Parmelee, 9 Conn. 259 : Reg. v. Neale. 1 Car: & K. 591; 1 Denison. Crown Cas. 37.

The Burke v. Hurney

4 F. Cas. 735 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1878

other against the steam-tug Glide, each in a cause of collision, in which the libellant claimed damages for the destruction of the schooner, and for the loss of the stores, utensils, and working apparatus which she had on board … S. 310 ; De Vaux v. Salvador, 4 Adol. & El. 431.

Forbes Lithograph Manuf'g Co. v. Worthington

25 F. 899 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jan 8, 1886

In Maillard v. Lawrence, 16 How. 261 , Mr. … In Arthur v.

Heriot v. Davis

12 F. Cas. 16 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1846

. § 26, note 3; Brown v. Noyes [Case No. 2,023]. … [Browne v. Strode] 5 Cranch [9 U. S.] 303; Wormley v. Wormley, 8 Wheat. [21 U. S.] 421; Russell v. Clark’s Ex’r., 7 Cranch [11 U. S.] 98.

Babcock v. Terry

2 F. Cas. 303 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Apr 15, 1866

It was agreed, that if the master procured on board the ship four thousand barrels of oil, or a full ship, his lay was to be one-sixteenth, otherwise one-seventeenth. … And upon this, the case of Hazard v. Howland, [Case No. 6,280,] decided by Judge Sprague in 1863, is a direct authority.