Case law

Hart v. Shaw

11 F. Cas. 691 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1859

Jennings, 7 Term R. 381; Bright v. Cowper, 1 Brownlow & G. 21; Towle v. Kettell, 5 Cush. 18 ; Coffin v. Storer, 5 Mass. 252 ; Barker v. Cheviot, 2 Johns. 352 ; Blanchard v. Buckman, 3 Me. 1 . … Bork v. Norton [Case No. 1,659]; Clarke v. Crabtree [Id. 2,847]; Giles v. The Cynthia [Id. 5,424]; Kleine v. Catara [Id. 7,869]; The Nathaniel Hooper [Id. 10,032]; Clendaniel v. Tuckerman, 17 Barb. 184 .

Palmer v. Warren Ins. Co.

18 F. Cas. 1056 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1840

Blackett v. Royal Exchange Assur. Co., 2 Cromp. & J. 244; Donnell v. Columbian Ins. Co. [Case No. 3,987]. See, also, Earl of Cardigan v. Armitage, 2 Barn. & C. 197, 206; Bullen v. Denning, 5 Barn. & C. 847, 850, 851. … If a policy was on all the cargo on board a ship, excluding the fruit on board, we should deem it a mere exception of the fruit.

Nashua & L. R. Co. v. Boston & L. R. Co.

27 F. 821 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 5, 1886

The board of directors of the two contracting corporations were accustomed to hold their meetings at the station in Boston. Questions were put to both boards by the president of both boards. … Railway Co. v. Allerton, 18 Wall. 233 ; Thomas v. Railroad Co., 101 U. S. 71 ; Cass v. Manchester Iron & Steel Co., 9 Fed. Rep. 640.

In re Hagop Bogigian Co.

104 F. 75 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 23, 1900

In Davies v. Arthur, 96 U. S. 128 , 24 L. … The actual decision in Davies v. Arthur, above cited, went on the same ground as that in Ilermum v. Bobertson.

Joslyn v. Nickerson

1 F. 133 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Feb 9, 1880

The master, mate and engineer had bsen duly licensed by the board of inspectors, and the master *134 was' also commissioned by the same board as a first-class-pilot, “as appears from the certificate, of which a copy, ‘C,’ … Steamship Co. v. Joliffe, 2 Wall. 450 .

Howland v. Harris

12 F. Cas. 734 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1827

It was perceived, and indeed the case had already occurred, as Olney v. … Ev. p. 133, c. 12, § 1; Putnam v. Wyley, 8 Johns. 337 .

The Alexander

1 F. Cas. 357 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1813

captors the property of British subjects, if any, which should be found on board. … [Adm.] 196; Potts v.

Philadelphia & Reading R. Co. v. Warren Foundry & Machine Co.

17 F. 606 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 14, 1883

The “stereotyped excuse,” as it has come to be called, from an energetic remark of Grier, J., in Haney v. … It does not appear whether there was a torch on board the schooner.

Rubber Step Manuf'g Co. v. Metropolitan R.

20 F. Cas. 1297 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Mar 11, 1878

This has already been decided in this court, in the case of Brown v. Rubber Step Manuf’g Co. [Case No. 2,028], not to anticipate the Keene invention, for the reasons fully stated in that case.

Baker v. City of New York

2 F. Cas. 454 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1858

John v. Paine, 10 How. [51 U. S.] 583; The Oregon v. Rocca, 18 How. [59 U. S.] 571; The Clement, [Case No. 2,879.] These rules of navigation ought to be strictly adhered to in all cases where they are applicable. … Bark Delaware v. Steamer Osprey, [Case No. 3,763.]

United States v. Beebe

103 F. 785 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 27, 1900

S. v. Newhall & Co. (C. C.) 91. Fed. 525. … S. v. Vewhall & Co. Second.

Daigneau v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co.

153 F. 593 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 8, 1906

BROWN, District Judge. I am of the opinion that the jury in arriving at a verdict of $6,500 in this case must have ipade a very much larger allowance for prospective damages than is warranted by the proof. … Arkansas Cattle Co. v. Mann, 130 U. S. 69 , 9 Sup. Ct. 458, 32 L. Ed. 854 ; Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Herbert, 116 U. S. 642, 646 , 6 Sup. Ct. 590, 29 L. Ed. 755 ; Hansen v. Boyd, 161 U. S. 397 , 16 Sup.

Donahoe v. Kettell

7 F. Cas. 877 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1858

Drinkwater v. The Spartan [Case No. 4,085] 1 Conk. Adm. 178. When goods and merchandise are carried by sea from one place to another, they are .usually shipped on board a vessel under a charter-party or bill of lading. … Gracie v. Palmer, 8 Wheat. [21 U. S.] 605; Webb v. Peirce [Case No. 17.320]; -Clarkson v. Edes, 4 Cow. 470 ; Taggart v. Boring, 16 Mass. 336 ; Raymond v. Tyson, 17 How. [58 U. S.] 63; Pickman v.

Clarke v. Crabtree

5 F. Cas. 945 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1854

If he advanced the money for them and acted as their agent in the purchase, they would own anu furnish the cargo as truly as Jf "me of them being at Bonaire should bu_ it, and deliver it on board. … Mar. bk. 2, c. 4, § 3, p. 255; Kleine v. Catara [Case No. 7.869].

United States v. Plumer

27 F. Cas. 561 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jul 6, 1859

S. v. … Peake v. Oldham, Cowp. 275; Rex v. Benfield, 2 Burrows, 980; Reg. v. Rhodes, 2 Ld. Raym. 886; Rex v. Hill, Russ. & R. 190; Reg. v. Ingram, 1 Salk. 384; Grant v. Astle, 2 Doug. 730 ; Young v. King, 3 Term R. 98; Rex v.

United States v. Thompson

28 F. Cas. 102 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1832

See Ross v. Walker, 2 Wils. 264; Wheeler v. Thompson, 2 Strange, 707; Ragg v. King, Id. 858. … The first is for an endeavour to commit a revolt on board the ship.

Adams v. The Island City

1 F. Cas. 119 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1859

She had nine men on board, and was employed in the service some twenty-four hours. Thirteen days were spent by the steamer R. B. … Cromwell v. The Island City, 1 Black, (66 U. S.) 121.]

Cromwell v. The Island City

6 F. Cas. 859 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1859

Tyson v. Prior [Id. 14,319]. … Mason v. The Blaireau, 2 Cranch [6 U. S.] 240.

Jay v. Almy

13 F. Cas. 387 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1846

See cases in Allen v. Blunt [Id. 217]; Taylor v. Carpenter [Id. 13,785]. … And though Jay is not justified in claiming wages of the captain, as he entered on board the vessel upon shares, yet, under the contract in such cases, he is entitled to his portion of the oil and bone then on board and saved

Dodge v. Perkins

7 F. Cas. 798 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1827

In Chappedelaine v. Dechenaux, 4 Cranch [8 U. … Browne v. Strode, 5 Cranch [9 U. S.] 303. is not inconsistent with this decision; for there the real plaintiff was an alien, and alive; and the nominal plaintiffs only sued officially for his benefit.