Case law

Harvey v. Richards

11 F. Cas. 746 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1818

Berquier, 1 Bin. 336 ; Guier v. O’Daniel, Id. 349 , note; Potter v. Brown, 5 East, 124. … In Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick (cited 6 Brown, Parl.

United States v. Beebe

117 F. 670 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Sep 4, 1902

S. v. J. … S. v.

Gibbs Loom Harness & Reed Co. v. Howard Bros. Mfg. Co.

153 F. 291 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 7, 1907

BROWN, District Judge. This suit involves claims 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14, and lo of letters patent No. 626,900, issued June 13, 1899, to William H. Gibbs, for a heddle-making machine. … Peg Wood Co. v. F. B. Sturtevant Co., 125 Fed. 378 , 60 C. C. A. 244 .

Celluloid Manuf'g Co. v. Tower

26 F. 451 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Sep 30, 1885

This patent was the subject of the controversy in Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v. Pratt, 21 Fed. Rep. 313. … Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co., 93 U. S. 486 . We do not think the doctrine applies to this case.

Picquet v. Swan

19 F. Cas. 617 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1830

The importance of having the person before the court, whose interests are to be bound by an account or debt, is very forcibly illustrated by the case of Fell v. Brown, 2 Brown, Ch. 276. … See Degraves v. Dane, 15 Ves. 291; Bligh v. -, 13 Ves. 455; Naylor v. Taylor, 16 Ves. 127; Puller v. Willis, 3 Ves. & B. 1.

The Packet

18 F. Cas. 965 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1823

Lane v. Penniman, 4 Mass. 91 ; Milward v. Hallett, 2 Caines, 77 ; White v. Baring, 4 Esp. 22; Hodgson v. Butts, 3 Cranch [7 U. S.] 140. … Hussey v. Christie, 13 Ves. 594; Ex parte Halkett, 3 Ves. & B. 135; 19 Ves. 474; 2 P. Wms. 367. Our own admiralty courts have on several occasions recognized its existence and enforced it. Burgin v.

Pitman v. Hooper

19 F. Cas. 730 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1837

It was recognized by this court in the case of Brown v. Lull [Case No. 2,0181. See, also, Sir Leoline Jenkins’ argument before the house or lords. 6 Hall, Law .T. 5GG. … Mashiter v. Buller, 1 Camp. 84; Gillan v. Simpkins, 4 Camn. 241: Blakey v. Dixon, 2 Bos. & P. 321; Manfield v. Maitland. 4 Barn. & Ald. 582; De Silvale. v. Kendall, 4 Maule & S. 37; Tasker v.

The Draco

7 F. Cas. 1032 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1835

See Benzen v. Jeffries, 1 Ld. Raym. 152; Justin v. Ballam, 2 Ld. Raym. 805; Johnson v. Ship-pen, Id. 988). … This was the doctrine of the house of lords in Lynch v. Dalzell, 3 Brown, Parl. Cas. 431, and was affirmed by Lord Hardwicke in Sadlers’ Co. v. Badcock, 2 Atk. 554.

Nutter v. Mossberg

116 F. 488 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 26, 1902

BROWN, District Judge. This suit is for infringement of letters patent No. 491,012, dated January 31, 1893, to Lewis E. Ericson, for an improvement in bicycle bells. This patent has been before this court (Nutter v. … In the opinion of the circuit court of appeals in Nutter v. Brown, 39 C. C.

The Eliza

8 F. Cas. 455 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1813

S. v. The Active, 7 Cranch [11 U. S.] 100. … As to the wine and other articles on board, claimed by Mr.

Woodbury Patent Planing Mach. Co. v. Keith

30 F. Cas. 489 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jan 15, 1879

See Teese v. Huntingdon, 23 How. [64 U. S.] 10; Agawam Co. v. Jordan, 7 Wall. [74 U. S.] 596; Roemer v. Simon, 95 U. S. 219 . … See Graham v. Mason [Case No. 5,671]; Brown v. Hall [Id. 2,00S]; Barker v. Stowe [Id. 994]. And there was notice of the name and residence of one witness to the use of the machine at Norwich.

Norton v. Rich

18 F. Cas. 430 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1824

Law, 494-498: 2 Browne, Civ. & Adm. Law, 435-489; Ought. Ords. Judi. tit. 277, 289, 254; Clerke, Praxis, tit. 53. and note; Cod. lib. 7, tit. G2, § (i. … [Glass v. The Betsey] 3 Dall. [3 U. S.] 6, note.

United States v. Taylor

28 F. Cas. 31 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1837

Bromage v. Prosser, 4 Barn. & C. 255. See, also, 2 Starkle, Ev. (2d London Ed.) “Malice,” p. 486; Philip’s Case, 1 Moody, Cr. Cas. 264, 273; Blunt v. Little [Case No. 1,578]; Dexter v. Spear [Id. 3,867]; U. S. v. … S. v. Coffin [Case No. 14,824].

Worthington v. City of Boston

41 F. 23 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jan 11, 1890

Brady v. Mayor, 20 N. Y. 312 ; Mayor v. Eschbach, 18 Md. 276 ; Dibble v. New Haven, 56 Conn. 199 , 14 Atl. Rep. 210 ; The Floyd Acceptances, 7 Wall. 666 ; Bank v. Winchester, 8 Allen, 109 ; Palmer v. … Y. 100 ; Pavement Co. v. Painter, 35 Cal. 699 ; Zottman v. San Francisco, 20 Cal. 96 ; Dean v. Charlton, 23 Wis. 590 .

Tyson v. Prior

24 F. Cas. 489 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1812

S.] 188; Mason v. The Blaireau, 2 Cranch [6 U. S.] 240; Bond v. The Cora, 2 Pet. [27 U. S.] 361. … Mason v. The Blaireau [supra]; Bond v. The Cora, 2 Pet. [27 U. S.] 361.

Butler v. Shaw

21 F. 321 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 20, 1884

From the decision of the board of examiners Mrs. … Suffolk Co. v. Hayden, 3 Wall. 315 ; Adams v. Jones, 1 Fisher, Pat. Cas. 527; Graham v. McCormick, 10 Biss. 39 ; McMillin v. Rees, 5 Ban. & A. 269 .

Anonymous

1 F. Cas. 996 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1812

Baldwin v. -, Bunb. 49; Lock v. Williford, Id. 72; Kennet v. Lloyd, Id. 58; Edgell v. Decker, Id. 252; Brooke v. Day, Id. 334. And in Attorney General v. … Clerke’s Prax. tit 54; 1 Brown, Civil & Adm. Law, 500; 2 Brown, Civil & Adm. Law, 436; Cod. lib. 7, tit. 63, §§ 1, 4; Yeaton v. U. S., 5 Cranch, [9 U. S.] 281.

Central Trust Co. v. Worcester Cycle Mfg. Co.

110 F. 491 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jul 12, 1901

BROWN, District Judge. … Sanford Tool Co. v. Howe, Brown & Co., 157 U. S. 312 , 15 Sup. Ct. 621, 39 L. Ed. 713 .

United States v. Nye

27 F. Cas. 210 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1855

S. v. Haines [supra], U. S. v. Gardner [Case No. 15.188], and U. S. v. Barker [Id. 14,516], were decided. … S. v. Staly [Id. 16,374].

Ruggles v. General Interest Ins.

20 F. Cas. 1321 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1825

Fourthly, Stewart v. Dunlop, 4 Brown, Parl. Cas. 483, note. … The editor of Brown thinks the decision founded on deception or fraud.