Case law

Van Ness v. Van Ness

28 F. Cas. 1058 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 29, 1846

While she kept a boarding house in this city she became known to General Van Ness, and that he was infatuated with her, and that she erred, and that an offspring was born of these parties; yet she had importuned him for the … He cited Church v. Hubbart, 2 Cranch [6 U. S.] 237; Dalrymple v. Dalrymple, 2 Hagg. Consist. 54; Brush v. Wilkins, 4 Johns. Ch. 520 ; Mostyn v. Fabrigas, Cowp. 161; 1 Greenl.

Mandeville v. Cookendorfer

16 F. Cas. 586 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1828

. & Sel. 259; Little v. Barreme, 2 Cranch, 179 ; and 1 Chitty on Pleading, 67. The case of Bush v. … So in the case of Rowning v.

Winter v. Simonton

30 F. Cas. 346 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1827

In Story’s Abbott, p. 273, it is said, that if the price of transportation of goods be paid upon their being laden on board the vessel, even “ this payment, although commonly called freight, is not properly so denominated … , that word denoting the price rather of actual carriage than of receiving goods in order to be carried; and therefore in the case of Blakey v.

Ex parte O'Hara

18 F. Cas. 620 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Nov 28, 1860

And if the specification and claim shall not have been so modified, as in the opinion of the commissioner shall entitle the applicant to a patent, he may on appeal, and upon request in writing, have the decision of a board … I will conclude by quoting the language of Judge McLean, in delivering the opinion of the supreme court in the case of Shaw v. Cooper [7 Pet. (32 U.

Walker v. Smith

29 F. Cas. 51 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1857

McNulty v. … As to the legal character of the claim in the ease of Judson v. Corcoran, see Comegys v. Vasse, 1 Pet. [26 U. S.] 193, 216. See, also, De Bode v. Reg. (in Dom.

Bank of Columbia v. French

2 F. Cas. 631 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1804

Mogadara v. Holt, 1 Show. 318; Hart v. King, 12 Mod. 310; Borough v. Perkins, 1 Salk. 131; Tassell v. Lewis, 1 Ld. Raym. 744; Lambert v. Oakes, Id. 443; Gee v. Brown, Strange, 792; Heylin v. Adamson, 2 Burrows, 674. … In De Berdt v.

United States v. Beerman

24 F. Cas. 1065 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Jul 27, 1838

S. v. … S. v.

Johnson v. Potomac Bldg. Ass'n

13 F. Cas. 784 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Jul 1, 1857

The cases of Roberts v. Trenayne, Cro. Jac. 509, Floyer v. Edwards, Cowp. 113, and Wells v. … See Eaton v. Lyon, 3 Ves. 693; cases of Sanders v. Pope, 12 Ves., at page 291; Hill v. Barclay, 16 Ves. 403, 18 Ves. 58; Bracebridge v. Buckley, 2 Price, 206; Rolfe v.

Corporation of Washington v. Eaton

29 F. Cas. 345 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1833

So also in the case of the United States v. Colt, 1 Peters, C. C. … And, in speaking of the case of Pemberton v.

United States v. Watkins

28 F. Cas. 419 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Jul 15, 1829

In Brown’s Case, 3 Chit. Cr. … Wyat v. Aland, 1 Salk. 325; Rex v. Stevens, 5 East, 257; Amhurst v. Skynner, 12 East, 270; and Woolnoth v. Meadows, 5 East, 463.

United States v. Houston

26 F. Cas. 379 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1832

Slanbery’s boarding-house is situated ; and, at the time of this occurrence, he was neither seeking for, nor expecting, the said Stanbery. … The opinion, thus expressed by this Court, upon this part of the case, is corroborated by that of the late Chief Justice Parsons, *268 of Massachusetts, in the case of Coffin v. Coffin, 4 Mass. Rep. 34, 35 .

United States v. Beerman

5 D.C. 412 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1838

C. 515 to 522; Young v. The King, 3 T. R. 106; Leach, 531, 568; Rex v. Jones, 2 Camp. 132; Archbold’s Cr. Plead. 54, 59, 60; Rex v. Fuller, 1 B. & P. 181; Rex v. Galloway, R. & M. 234; Rex v. … . & P. 413; Rex v. Madden, Moody, C. C. 277; Commonwealth v. Symonds, 2 Mass. Rep. 163, 164 ; 1 Chitty Cr. Law 168, 172, 248, 252 a; Thomas's case, 2 East’s Cr. Law, 934; Co. Lit. 304 a; Commonwealth v. Dove, 2 Vir.

United States v. Watkins

3 D.C. 441 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1829

So in the case of Rex v. … Wyat v. Aland, 1 Salk. 325; The King v. Stephens and others, 5 East, 257; Amherst v. Skinner, 12 East, 270, and Woolroth v. Meadows, 5 East, 463.

Wickersham v. Singer

29 F. Cas. 1134 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Jul 15, 1859

The decisions of Judge Woodbury in the case of Adams v. Edwards [Case No. 53], of Judge Nelson in Wilder v. Gayler [Id. 17,019], and of Judge Crier in Rich v. … S.] in case of Wilder v.

Wilson v. Singer

30 F. Cas. 217 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1860

Commissioner Bishop, in his decision, so treats the claims of the parties in controversy, as did the board of appeals in the office. and being myself of the same opinion, I shall dismiss all that is said by Singer’s *220 … In Moody v.

United States v. White

28 F. Cas. 550 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1836

Key also cited Rowe v. Huntington, Vaughan, 75, 76; 5 Burr. 2662; Evans’s Harris, Ent. 335; Coffin v. Jones, 11 Pickering, 45; Triplett v. Micon, 1 Randolph, 269. Mr. R. J. Brent, for the defendant, contra,. … Dig. 258, s. 41; Thompson v. Betton, 14 Johnson, 86 .

United States ex rel. Stokes v. Kendall

26 F. Cas. 702 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1837

The case of McIntire v. … Dean & Chapter of Dublin v. Dowgatt, 1 P. Wm. 348; 1 Brown, Parl. Cas. 73; 3 Brown, Parl. Cas. 505; Wheelwright v. Columbian Ins. Co., 7 Wheat. [20 U.