Case law

Finn v. United States

548 F.2d 340 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1971

This board recommended a 50 percent disability rating. … Unterberg v. United States, supra; Merson v. United States, supra; Stephens v. United States, supra.

Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. The United States

439 F.2d 185 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1971

Corp. v. United States, 162 F.Supp. 772 , 776, 142 Ct.Cl. 609, 616 (1958). … See United States v. Utah Constr. & Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394 , 86 S.Ct. 1545 , 16 L.Ed.2d 642 (1966); Paccon, Inc. v. United States, 399 F.2d 162, 168-169 , 185 Ct.Cl. 24, 35 (1968); Chaney & James Constr. Co. v.

Getzoff v. United States

109 F. Supp. 712 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1953

Under our decisions in Lezin v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 724 , 98 F. Supp. 574 ; Jackson v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 405 ; and Mendez v. United States, 119 C. … Neither the case of Garcia v. United States, No. 50459, decided December 2, 1952, nor Wheeler v. United States, No. 74-52, decided December 2, 1952, involve the point discussed above.

C. W. Schmid D/B/A C. W. Schmid Plumbing & Heating v. The United States

351 F.2d 651 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1965

Applying the rationale of Rice v. … The Board’s determinations in this regard are legal decisions which are not binding on the court, 41 U.S.C. § 322 , W. H. Edwards Engineering Corp. v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 322 .

O'Hare v. United States

109 F. Supp. 715 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1953

Plaintiff contends, as in McCormick v. United States, C. Cls. No. 364-52, ante, p. 111, that his claim did not arise until June 27, 1951, when the Railroad Retirement Board finally denied him relief. … See also Wheeler v. United States, C. Cls. No. 74-52, decided December 2,1952. The fact situation alleged in the instant case differs in one respect from that in McCormick v. United States, supra.

Cramp Shipbuilding Co. v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 72 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 8, 1952

See Martin Wunderlich v. United States, 117 C. Cls. 92, 212 , reversed on other grounds 342 U. S. 98 ; McWilliams Dredging Co. v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 1, 16 , for *98 discussion and citations. … The plaintiff urges that a contractor with the Government is not prejudiced by his failure to take a vain appeal, citing United States v. Smith, 256 U. S. 11 . In United States v. Blair, 321 U.

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. United States

7 F. Supp. 290 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1934

the Board. … Co. v. United States, 48 F.(2d) 973 , 71 Ct.

Middleton v. United States

175 Ct. Cl. 786 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1966

In the second suit, Egan v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 1 , 158 F. … Nathanson v. NLRB 344 U.S. 25, 27 (1952) ; Social Security Bd. v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358, 364-65 (1946) ; NLRB v.

Kimmel v. United States

196 Ct. Cl. 579 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 10, 1971

Hamrick v. United States, 120 Ct. Cl. 17, 25 , 96 F. Supp. 940, 943 (1951). See also Frame v. United States, 124 Ct. Cl. 557, cert. denied, 345 U.S. 994 (1953); Thomas v. United States, 123 Ct. … See also Forshew v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 597 (1960); Palmer v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 376 (1957); Kilbanks v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 128 (1957); Updike v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 627 , 132 F.

Antonio A. Versaci v. The United States

403 F.2d 246 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1968

McGiven v. United States, 183 Ct.Cl. 920 (1968). Cf. Brozik v. … As was stated in Beckham v.

Russell

652 F.2d 68 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 30, 1981

Butz v. Glover Livestock Comm’n Co., 411 U.S. 182, 187, 188 (1973); Jones v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 138 , 617 F.2d 233 (1980). … Compare Alers v. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. 560 , 633 F.2d 559 (1980); Wynne v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 647 (1979); Pascal v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 183 , 543 F.2d 1284 (1976); Grover v. United States, 200 Ct.

Carl M. Halvorson, Inc. v. United States

461 F.2d 1337 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

Co. v. United States, 190 Ct. … Co. v. United States, supra, 190 Ct.

Gus Kraus, Doing Business as Condor MacHine Works v. The United States

366 F.2d 975 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1966

Corp. v. United States, 351 F.2d 972 , 169 Ct.Cl. 384 (1965); Tufano Contracting Corp. v. United States, 356 F.2d 535 , 174 Ct.Cl. 398 (1966). For the reasons hereinafter set out, we reject the decision of the Board. … Corp. v.

Quailes v. United States

25 Cl. Ct. 659 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1992

In military pay matters, the court reviews a plaintiff’s case “through the prism of a correction board.” Cohn v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 778, 789 (1988). … Procedurally this case is similar to Yount v.

Entwistle Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,807 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 28, 1984

See Ramsey v. … Defendant’s argument disregards the weight accorded the Board’s factual findings. The Board’s factual findings are presumptively correct. Jefferson Constr. Co. v.

Tester Corp. v. United States

28 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,288 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1981

The Board correctly found that plaintiffs refusal to perform and abandonment of its duties were adequate bases for termination for default. See American Dredging Company v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 1010, 1013 (1975). … Tapper v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 34 , 611 F.2d 354 (1979).

Allied Contractors, Inc. v. United States

176 Ct. Cl. 1095 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

After a ruling by this court that, pursuant to United States v. … In a case in which it is determined that United States v.

Leesona Corp. v. United States

599 F.2d 958 · United States Court of Claims · May 16, 1979

The award granted by Trial Judge Browne punishes the U.S. … Trial Judge Browne cited our opinion in Tektronix, Inc. v. United States, supra, as authority for the award of both items.

General Dynamics Corp. v. United States

671 F.2d 474 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 10, 1982

Arizona v. United States, 216 Ct. Cl. at 235 , 575 F.2d at 863 . … V. CONCLUSION To recapitulate, we affirm the Board’s ruling that the reasonable-cost termination provision of the contract applies.

Frye v. United States

210 Ct. Cl. 325 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

In Kingsley v. United States, 172 Ct. … See Bevins v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 547 (1964); Ludzinski v. United States, 154 Ct. Cl. 215 (1961); Frederick v. United States, 150 Ct.