Case law

Lewicki v. United States

204 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1974

Horne v. United States, 190 Ct. Cl. 145, 150 , 419 F. 2d 416, 419 (1969); Travis v. United States, 199 Ct. Cl. 67, 70 (1972). We concur with the unreported decision of Richard M. Goldman v. United States (W.D. … See Cowan v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 739, 744-45 , 316 F. 2d 740, 744 (1963); Ward v. United States, 158 F. 2d 499, 500-01 (8th Cir. 1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 844 (1947).

O'Brien v. United States

124 Ct. Cl. 655 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1953

See Baxter v. United States, 122 C. Cls. 632 ; Borak v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 236,245 ; Borak v. Biddle, 147 F. 2d 278, 281 . … Green v. United States, No. 48991, 124 C.

Berdan Fire-Arms Manufacturing Co. v. United States

26 Ct. Cl. 48 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1890

(Burr v. Duryee, 1 Wallace, 531; Case v. Brown, 2 Wallace, 820; Seymour v. Osborn, 11 Wallace, 516; Dedrick v. Seigmund, Official Gazette, vol. 52, No. 10, p. 1537; The Corn Planter Patent, 23 Wallace, 181.) … It appeared that Palmer had exhibited his invention to a board of army officers, which recommended its adoption to the War Department.

S.S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 729 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 2, 1981

The Board discussed this court’s decision in Bell v. United States, 186 Ct. … The Board also summarized our decisions in Dravo Corp. v. United States 219 Ct. Cl. 416 , 594 F.2d 842 (1979); Singer Co. v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 281 , 568 F.2d 695 (1977), and Framlau Corp. v.

H. N. Bailey & Associates v. The United States

449 F.2d 376 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1971

Thus, it failed to meet its burden of establishing in what respects the administrative record did not support the findings of the Board. Sundstrand Turbo v. … Snyder-Lynch Motors, Inc. v.

American Dredging Co.

21 Cont. Cas. Fed. 84,078 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 30, 1975

“We affirm the Board on both counts. … River Construction Corp. v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 254, 261 (1962). In the instant case, such substantial evidence is present to support the Board’s conclusion.

Atwell v. United States

1 F. Supp. 720 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1932

Following these two decisions, the Board, in considering the case of Bonwit Teller & Co. v. Commissioner, 17 B. T. … A. 1019, expressly overruled the McNeill Case, supra, and following this case the board considered the case of Julia Stow Lovejoy v. Commissioner, 18 B. T. A. 1179, and expressly overruled the Olinger Case, supra.

Gruendyke v. United States

639 F.2d 745 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1981

Hary v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 10 , 618 F.2d 704 (1980); Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285 , 594 F.2d 804 (1979). See also Yee v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 388 , 512 F.2d 1383 (1975). … Unlike in Skinner v.

Kaeserman

207 Ct. Cl. 983 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1975

Assuming the Board to be unwilling to exercise its discretion favorably in the premises, there is no way this court can constructively and retroactively order active duty or promotions in rank. Abruzzo v. … Merson v. United States, 173 Ct. Cl. 92, 97-98 (1965). “The 1973 order in this case anticipated Testan v. United States, 205 Ct.

Foster Wheeler Corp. v. United States

513 F.2d 588 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

Co. v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 514, 518 (1960). To the extent that the Board’s decision was one of law, this court is, of course, free to arrive at its own conclusions. Tombigbee Constructors v. … V Assumption of the Bish of Impossibility The Board found 20 that FWC generally assumed “contractual responsibility and risk” of impossibility.

Sargisson v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 539 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1987

Gentry v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 654 , 656, 650 F.2d 290 (1980); see also Fleming v. … As a preliminary matter, we note that the standard this court applies in reviewing military Board decisions has been firmly established. In Heisig v.

Newsom v. United States

676 F.2d 647 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1982

Newsom, of a decision of the Veterans Administration Board of Contract Appeals (board). 1 The board found that certain parts of the contract for hospital improvements were patently ambiguous and that, having failed to consult … Co. v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 1, 6 , 314 F.2d 501 , 504 (1963); Blount Bros. Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 478, 495-96 , 346 F.2d 962, 971-72 (1965). See Beacon Constr. Co. v.

General Electric Company, a Corporation v. The United States

440 F.2d 420 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1971

For example, in Scherr & McDermott, Inc. v. … United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709, 717 , 83 S.Ct. 1409, 1415 , 10 L.Ed.2d 652 (1963); see Sherwin v. United States, 436 F.2d 992 , 193 Ct.Cl. 962 (Jan. 1971).

Venice Maid Co. v. United States

639 F.2d 690 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1980

Zoda v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 49, 57 , 180 F. Supp. 419, 424 (1960). … See, e.g., Churchill Chemical Corp. v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 284, 293 , 602 F.2d 358, 363 (1979); United States v. Thompson, 168 F.

Benton v. United States

488 F.2d 1017 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1973

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 (1965). … Por example, In Ramspeck v.

Cosmopolitan Manufacturing Co. v. United States

297 F.2d 546 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 12, 1962

Empire Institute of Tailoring, Inc. v. United States, 161 F.Supp. 409 , 142 Ct.Cl. 165 ; Levine v. *548 United States, 137 F.Supp. 955 , 133 Ct.Cl. 774 ; Sese v. United States, 113 F.Supp. 658 , 125 Ct.Cl. 526 ; Gray v. … was made, because there was pending before the Board a motion for reconsideration.

Alexander v. United States

148 Ct. Cl. 24 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1960

Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367 (1919), and Bailey v. United States, 144 C. Cls. 720 . … class by two Selection Boards, including the 1952 Selection Board, shall be separated from the Service. 3.

Charles H. Blanchard, Jr., Doing Business as Blanchard Construction Company v. The United States

347 F.2d 268 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

Therefore, the administrative appeals board decision lacks finality. See W. H. Edwards Eng’r Corp. v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 322 (1963) and Beacon Construction Co. v. … There was here no testimony submitted to the Board or any Board hearing in the usual sense.

Spokane Valley General Hospital, Inc. v. United States

688 F.2d 771 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 8, 1982

The district court overturned the Board’s decision because it was "unsupported by substantial evidence” and was "erroneous in its legal conclusions.” Spokane Valley General Hospital, Inc. v. Harris, No. … Louis University v.

Spencer v. United States

100 F. Supp. 444 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1951

In United States v. … * * * ” In Runkle v.