Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

3.18s

  • Busby School of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States

    8 Cl. Ct. 588 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 25, 1985

    Co. v. … See United States v. John C. Grimberg Co., 702 F.2d 1362, 1367 (Fed.Cir.1983); Harris Systems Internat’l, Inc. v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 253, 260-62 (1984). See also Golden Eagle Refining Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Sexton v. United States

    228 Ct. Cl. 706 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1981

    The failure was that the board had selected an insufficient percentage of officers from the "secondary zone” of promotion (officers junior in rank to those in the "primary zone”), see Doyle v. United States, 220 Ct. … The plaintiff sought review of these passovers from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, but that board denied relief.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • R.E.D.M. Corporation v. The United States

    428 F.2d 1304 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

    In Ithaca Gun Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Laka Tool & Stamping Co. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,202 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1984

    See Northern Helex Co. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 194, 197-202, 634 F.2d 557, 560-562 (1980). See also Gindes v. … Of Montana v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. United States

    499 F.2d 552 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

    Questions of law are for the court to decide independently of the board’s conclusions thereon which have no finality. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States, supra, ante at 65, 493 F. 2d at 1361 ; John McShain, Inc. v. … Co. v. United States, 192 Ct.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • General Electric Company, a Corporation v. The United States

    440 F.2d 420 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1971

    For example, in Scherr & McDermott, Inc. v. … United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709, 717 , 83 S.Ct. 1409, 1415 , 10 L.Ed.2d 652 (1963); see Sherwin v. United States, 436 F.2d 992 , 193 Ct.Cl. 962 (Jan. 1971).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Buch Express, Inc. v. United States

    132 F. Supp. 473 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1955

    See Northern Pump Co. v. Chicago M. St. P. & P. R. R. Co., 190 I. C. C. 421, 422; Markstein v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 243 I. C. C.. 345, 348; Linen Thread Co., Inc. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., 256 I. C. … Anthony v. Director General, 61 I. C. C. 366, 368; Simon v. Southern Railway, 102 I. C. C. 326; Union Smelting & Refining Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 152 *779 I. C. C. 434, 436; Lynchburg Iron & Metal Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Venice Maid Co. v. United States

    639 F.2d 690 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 19, 1980

    Zoda v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 49, 57 , 180 F. Supp. 419, 424 (1960). … See, e.g., Churchill Chemical Corp. v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 284, 293 , 602 F.2d 358, 363 (1979); United States v. Thompson, 168 F.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kellus v. United States

    13 Cl. Ct. 538 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1987

    See also Dunn v. … Qualls v. United States, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Keeney v. United States

    150 Ct. Cl. 53 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1960

    Defendant says that plaintiff’s claim first accrues when he is discharged from the Government, and since, as we stated in Cuiffo v. United States, 181 Ct. … As we pointed out in Cuiffo v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Richard v. United States

    152 F. Supp. 433 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1956

    Ed. 662 ; United States v. Stahl, 151 U. S. 366 , 14 S. Ct. 347 , 38 L. Ed. 194 ; Wisconsin Central R. Co. v. United States, 164 U. S. 190, 207-212 , 17 S. Ct. 45 , 41 L. Ed. 399 ; United States v. Wurts, 303 U. … Denby v. Berry, 263 U. S. 29 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hinkle v. United States

    229 Ct. Cl. 801 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1982

    Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93 (1953); Clayton v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 593 (1980); Diggs v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 1013 (1978). … Rutherford v. United States, 216 Ct. Cl. 163 , 573 F.2d 1224 (1978); Diggs v. United States, supra; Finn v. United States, 212 Ct. Cl. 353 , 548 F.2d 340 (1977); Unterberg v. United States, 188 Ct.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Faircloth v. United States

    186 Ct. Cl. 133 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

    There have been instances where the Board has been held to have been arbitrary or capricious, but such a determination has been the result of Board refusal to correct a record, Grubin v. United States, 166 Ct. … Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964); Powers v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 388 (1966), or the result of Board refusal to grant a hearing and correct the record, Hoppock v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 1147 (1966).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Idaho Maryland Mines Corp. v. United States

    104 F. Supp. 576 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1952

    In the case of Mugler v. … In Thompson v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Godbee

    222 Ct. Cl. 646 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 15, 1980

    All of the serious arguments raised by the parties in this case were disposed of favorably to plaintiffs by our decision in Doyle v. United States and Adams v. United States (considered in the same opinion), 220 Ct. … See the order of the court in Eddy v. United States, post at 650.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Blake Construction Co. v. United States

    597 F.2d 1357 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 18, 1979

    An issue as to the meaning of language in a contract is for this court to decide independently, as no finality is attached to a conclusion of law reached by the board. Allied Paint Mfg. Co. v. … Co. v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 1339, 1361-62 , 364 F.2d 439, 453 (1966), quoting Jefferson Constr. Co. v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 75, 84 (1960).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Aluminum Co. of America v. United States

    87 Ct. Cl. 96 · United States Court of Claims · May 2, 1938

    Cls. 74 ; Standard Dredging Co. v. United States, 71 C. Cls. 218 ; Briggs & Turivas, Inc., v. United States, 72 C. Cls. 674 ; Helvetia Milk Condensing Co. v. United States, 74 C. Cls. 142, 470 ; Whitbeck v. … United States v. Kaufman, 96 U. S. 567 ; United States v. Savings Bank, 104 U.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Yerxa v. United States

    11 Cl. Ct. 110 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1986

    See Brundage v. United States, 504 F.2d 1382 , 205 Ct.Cl. 502 (1974); Foster v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 440 (1983), aff'd, 733 F.2d 88 (Fed.Cir.1984); Pepper v. … Braddock v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 463 (1986); Yongue v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 635 (1986); and Cason v. United States, 471 F.2d 1225 , 200 Ct.Cl. 424 (1973). .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dot Systems, Inc. v. United States

    30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,110 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 25, 1982

    Tapper & Assocs. v. United States, 222 Ct. Cl. 34, 38-41 , 611 F.2d 354, 357-58 (1979); Troup Bros., Inc. v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 850 (1979). … Webco Lumber, Inc. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 457 , 677 F.2d 860 (1982); Caffall Bros. Forest Products, Inc. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 517 , 678 F.2d 1071 , cert. denied October 12, 1982; Gregory Lumber Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Fulmer v. United States

    77 F. Supp. 927 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1948

    Yassin v. United States, Ct.CL, 76 F.Supp. 509 . … See Filor v. United States, 9 Wall. 45 , 19 L.Ed. 549 ; Willie Crockett Wright, Adm’r. v. United States, 86 Ct.Cl. 290 ; Burke and Herbert Bank and Trust Co., Administrator, et al. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.