Case law

Board of County Supervisors v. United States

23 Cl. Ct. 205 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1991

Hylton Enters, v. Board of Supervisors of Prince William County, 220 Va. 435, 440 , 258 S.E.2d 577, 581 (1979). … Accord Byrum v. Board of Supervisors of Orange County, 217 Va. 37, 39 , 225 S.E.2d 369, 371 (1976).

Ralston v. United States

91 Ct. Cl. 91 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 1, 1940

The case of Sweeney v. United States, 82 C. … See also SJiacJclette v. United States, 71 C. Cls. 376 .

Tester Corp. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,544 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1982

Tester Corp. v. United States, Ct.Cl. … In Rumley v.

Tucker v. United States

42 F. Supp. 292 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1942

Kirkendall v. United States, 90 C. Cls. 606 . … Accordingly, *418 Brown prepared and filed with the Board a petition for a redetermination of the deficiency. 7.

Sumner E. And Barbara P. Brown v. The United States

396 F.2d 459 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968

Brown, husband and wife, filed joint Federal personal income tax returns for the calendar years ending December 31, 1955 and December 31, 1956. On November 16, 1954, Sumner E. … In Lewis v.

Board of Field Officers v. United States

22 Ct. Cl. 58 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 20, 1886

To afford the *59 claimant a remedy as to the rent not embraced in the former judgment, Congress, in July, 1886, passed a special act for his relief, as follows: “AN ACT for the relief of the Board of Field Officers of the … Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Court of Claims shall, notwithstanding the bar prescribed by any statute of limitation, hear, determine, and adjudge any claim or claims of the Board

Waller v. United States

461 F.2d 1273 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

Birt v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 910, 913 (1967); Keef v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 454, 471 (1968). … Birt v. United States, supra, 180 Ct. Cl. at p. 913 ; Keef v. United States, supra, 185 Ct. Cl. at p. 461 .

Effingham County Board of Education v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 177 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1985

Two years prior to Foman , the Court in United States v. … And, consistent with this premise, we cite plaintiffs to the venerable old case of Friedman v.

Hadley v. Department of the Navy

229 Ct. Cl. 591 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1981

Cl. 129 , 654 F.2d 64 (1981), and the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … Brown v.

Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board v. United States

231 Ct. Cl. 738 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1982

source of the oil was an underground oil storage tank located in one of the parks owned and maintained by the Park Board. … The Park Board’s actions failed to meet the standard of reasonableness required by the statute.

Estate of Bogley v. United States

514 F.2d 1027 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1975

The Prince Georges resolution was amplified by a further resolution of its Board of Directors on December 8, 1958: Whereas, a question has arisen with respect to the intent of a resolution passed by the Board of Directors … See Restatement of Contracts § 32 (1932); Reiser Company v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc., 169 Md. 306 , 181 A. 465 (1935); Brown v. Fahey, 157 Md. 481 , 146 A. 264 (1929); Belmont v.

Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. United States

132 F. Supp. 711 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1955

These four Browns were members of the board of directors, but they did not constitute a majority of the board, which consisted of nine members in each year. … Bliss v. Commissioner, 57 F. 2d 984, 986 ; Reakirt v. Commissioner, 29 B. T. A. 1296, affirmed per curiam, 84 F. 2d 996 . Cf. Kornhauser v. United States, 276 U. S. 145 ; Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.

Baker v. United States

614 F.2d 263 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1980

Brown on January 18, 1977.” (Emphasis supplied). The petition also alleges that Brown appealed to the Appeals Review Board of the CSC on January 28, 1977, which appeal was denied by that Board on December 2, 1977. … See United States v. Consolidated Edison Co., 366 U.S.380, 385, n.5, 81 S.Ct.1326, 6 L.Ed.2d 356 (1961); Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Commissioner, 320 U.S.516, 64 S.Ct.364, 88 L.Ed. 270 (1944); Brown v.

Effingham County Board of Education v. United States

7 Cl. Ct. 34 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 10, 1984

Uram v. … In Uram v.

Allen v. United States

36 Ct. Cl. 44 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1901

Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States

320 F.2d 375 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1963

Produce Exchange Stock Clearing Assn. v. Helvering, 71 F. 2d 142, 143 (C.A.2, 1934). See Apartment Operations Assn. v. Commissioner, 136 F. 2d 435, 436 (C.A. 9, 1943); Growers Cold Storage Co. v. … American Automobile Assn. v.

Board of Trade Bldg., Inc. v. United States

1 F. Supp. 862 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1932

The plaintiff is a Virginia corporation engaged solely as the owner and operator of a building known as the Board of Trade Building, located in Norfolk, Va. … August 24, 1923, for the sole and express purpose of taking over and operating the Board of Trade Building.

Schnip Building Co. v. United States

645 F.2d 950 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1981

United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U.S. 1, 14-15 (1926); Hirsch v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 256, 260 , 499 F. 2d 1248, 1250 (1974). … Co. v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 925, 954 , 413 F. 2d 1167, 1184 (1969). The subsequent proceedings before the Board were wholly de novo. Blount Bros. Corp. v. United States, 191 Ct.

Hoel-Steffen Construction Co. v. United States

456 F.2d 760 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1972

See Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 757 , 345 F. 2d 833 (1985); L. W. Foster Sportswear Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 499 , 405 F. 2d 1285 (1969); La Crosse Garment Mfg. Co. v. … The Board’s finding to this effect Is also strongly supported by other substantial evidence. The company’s witnesses did not cite Mr. Brown as personally giving any directives or orders as to priority.

Board of County Com'rs of Sedgwick County v. United States

105 F. Supp. 995 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1952

Boeing Airplane Co. v. Board of County Com’rs of Sedgwick County, 164 Kan. 149 , 188 P.2d 429 , 11 A.L.R.2d 350 . … See Central Pacific Railroad v. Nevada, 162 U.S. 512 , 16 S.Ct. 885 , 40 L.Ed. 1057 ; Logan v. Board of Com’rs of Clark County, 51 Kan. 747 , 33 P. 603 .