Case law

Moten v. United States Postal Service

229 Ct. Cl. 796 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1982

Brewer v. United States, 227 Ct. Cl. 276, 282 , 647 F.2d 1093, 1098 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1144 (1982); Giles v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 602, 608-09 , 553 F.2d 647, 650-51 (1977); Power v. … See, e.g., Ross v. United States, ante at 759; Boyce v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 57, 67 , 543 F.2d 1290, 1295 (1976); Power v. United States, supra; Grover v. United States, supra; Cuiffo v. United States, 131 Ct.

Knight v. United States

152 Ct. Cl. 298 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1961

In Furlong v. United States, 138 Ct. … Cl. 511 ; Friedman v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 239 ; Patterson v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 435 ; and Allin v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 459 , have been decided by this conrt.

Life Insurance Co. of Georgia v. United States

650 F.2d 250 · United States Court of Claims · May 20, 1981

To the extent the decision of Bankers Union was based on the possibility of prepayment of the loans (which terminates the earning of interest on the principal), we believe Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. … Brown v. Helvering dealt with overriding insurance commissions; the Supreme Court stated: The overriding commissions were gross income of the year in which they were receivable.

General Dynamics Corp. v. United States

585 F.2d 457 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1978

McCord v. United States, 9 Ct. Cl. 155 (1873), aff'd sub nom. Chouteau v. United States, 95 U.S. 61 (1877). … A case cited therein, United States v.

McCormick-Selph v. United States

588 F.2d 808 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1978

United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Company, 317 U.S. 56, 61 (1942); Phillips Construction Company, Inc. v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 249, 261 , 394 F.2d 834, 841 (1968). … Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. United States, ante, at 441; Douglas v. United States, 217 Ct. Cl. 97 , 113 n. 26, 576 F.2d 887 , 895 n. 26 (1978); Sherwin v.

Schumacher v. United States

55 F.2d 1007 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1932

The stockholders approved the plan of reorganization and confirmed and ratified the action of the board of directors as set out in the letter of the secretary of the company. … A. 1; Mount v. Commissioner, 10 B. T. A. 1156; Garey v. Commissioner, 16 B. T. A. 274; Binger v. Commissioner, 22 B. T. A. 111; Noel v. Parrott (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 669 .

Haislip v. United States

296 F.2d 469 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1961

After our decision in Gordon v. United States, 134 Ct. … Indeed, we had already come to the conclusion that the law was as the Board said it was. We so decided in Gordon v. United States, supra.

Hemphill Schools, Inc. v. United States

135 F. Supp. 946 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1955

Plaintiff’s petition characterizes these actions of the Board as “erroneous”. … It says that United States v. Jones, Receiver, 336 U. S. 641 , and Capital Airlines, Inc. v. United States, 116 C. Cls. 850 , preclude this court from reviewing the rate determinations of the administrative-agency.

Hicks Corp. v. United States

487 F.2d 520 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1973

Finally, the Board record pertaining to Navy Contract No. 63-0376-f (Count V), 67-1 BCA ¶6304 , included a letter of May 20, 1965, from plaintiff’s president to the Navy in which he undertook to outline the background of … In sum, there was more than substantial record support for the Board’s conclusion that a fresh infusion of Government credit would have been plaintiff’s only salvation. Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct.

M-R-S Manufacturing Co. v. United States

492 F.2d 835 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1974

United States v. Stewart, 311 U.S. 60 (1940); Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States, 243 U.S. 389 (1917) ; see Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947); Montilla v. United States, 198 Ct. … Inc. v. United States, supra; Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States, supra; Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. United States, supra.

William F. Niedernhofer v. The United States

426 F.2d 1403 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1970

Defendant cites Miller v. … Grubin v. United States, 333 F.2d 861 , 166 Ct.Cl. 272 (1964); Hoppock v. United States, 163 Ct.Cl. 87 (1963); Patterson v.

T. W. Warner Co. v. United States

15 F. Supp. 160 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1936

In the case of Tait v. … It may be that if the Board of Tax Appeals had had the decision of the Supreme Court in Helvering v.

Hunt & Willett, Inc. v. United States

351 F.2d 980 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

in United States v. … WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 1 (1963), 323 F. 2d 874 ; Wingate Constr. Co. v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 131 (1964); Potter v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 28, 37, 38 (1964).

Andrews v. United States

163 Ct. Cl. 126 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1963

Frith v. United States, 156 Ct. Cl. 188 (1962). … Mackey v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 411, 415 , 142 F. Supp. 922, 924 (1956).

Hadden v. United States

130 F. Supp. 610 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955

Ketchum v. St. Louis County, 101 U.S. 306 , 25 L.Ed. 999 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U.S. 654 , 17 S.Ct. 453 , 41 L.Ed. 865 ; United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp., 267 U.S. 387 , 45 S.Ct. 338 , 69 L.Ed. 672 . … Adler v. Fenton, 24 How. 407 , 16 L.Ed. 696 ; Duell v. Brewer, supra.

Paskert v. United States

20 Cl. Ct. 65 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 28, 1990

Braddock v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 463, 472 (1986). In Sanders v. … a) (1988); Murphy v.

Kozak v. United States

458 F.2d 39 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

Horne v. United States, 190 Ct. Cl. 145, 150 , 419 F. 2d 416, 419 (1969); Greenway v. United States, 175 Ct. Cl. 350, 362 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 881 (1966); Knotts v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 489 , 121 F. … Supp. 630 (1954); Gadsden v. United States, 111 Ct. Cl. 487 , 78 F. Supp. 126 (1948).

Peterson-Sharpe Engineering Corp. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,873 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 4, 1984

There is no rule that a board decision be rendered by the individual who presided at the hearing. Tri-Cor, Inc. v. United States, 198 Ct.Cl. 187 , 458 F.2d 112, 116 (1972); Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. … See Tri-Cor, Inc. v. United States, 458 F.2d at 117 ; Sternberger v. United States, 401 F.2d at 1017 . In this case, the Board’s findings demonstrate that it reviewed the evidence compiled by the hearing officer.

Callan v. United States

450 F.2d 1121 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1971

Cosgriff v. United States, 181 Ct. Cl. 730, 737 , 387 F. 2d 390, 394 (1967); Towell v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 422, 436 (1960). Under this interpretation the Board was correct in not applying AFM 160-1. … Farrar v. United States, 173 Ct. Cl. 1008 , 358 F. 2d 965 (1965); Hutter v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 517 , 345 F. 2d 828 (1965); Weiner v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 445 (1960).

Merando, Inc. v. United States

475 F.2d 603 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 16, 1973

Although this court is not bound by the Board’s interpretation of the contract provisions, since such is a matter of law, (International Telephone and Telegraph v. United States, 197 Ct. … Corp. v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 912, 918 , 428 F. 2d 1267, 1271 (1970); Paschen Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 190 Ct.