Case law

Rogers v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 1023 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1992

Brown v. United States, 5 Ci.Ct. 1, 16 (1984). … See Pinkston v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 263, 265-67 (1984); Singleton v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 156, 164 (1984); South Louisiana Grain Services v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 281, 288 (1982). .

Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States

461 F.2d 1352 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

Co. v. United States, 190 Ct. Cl. 50 , 418 F. 2d 1356 (1969); Zidell Explorations, Inc. v. United States, 192 Ct. … V. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 358 , 393 F. 2d 807 (1968) ; Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 644 , 413 F. 2d 568 (1969) ; Lykes-Youngstown Corp. v. United States, 190 Ct.

Braun v. United States

163 Ct. Cl. 84 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1963

He appeared before another Army retiring board on December 18, 1946, and this board determined that he was not permanently incapacitated for active duty and recommended full general military service. … Plaintiff concedes that this case must be decided adversely to him pursuant to Lipp v. United States, 157 Ct. Cl. 197 , 301 F. 2d 674 , (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 932 , and Friedman, v. United States, 159 Ct.

Harper v. United States

310 F.2d 405 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1962

In these circumstances, his suit was timely under the rule, previously applied in Proper v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 511 , and Patterson v. United States, 141 Ct. … See, also, Weiner v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 445 .

Haldane v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 691 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1983

The only affidavit on record is plaintiff’s of January 22, 1981, which was submitted to the Board. Constraining the court’s review of the Board’s determination are standards that recently were restated in Parthemore v. … Finn v. United States, 212 Ct.Cl. 353 , 548 F.2d 340 ; Frye v. United States, 210 Ct.Cl. 325 (1976); Storey v.

Lloyd v. United States

73 Ct. Cl. 722 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1931

S. 445 ; United States v. Cress, supra; Wiggins v. United States, 3 C. Cls. 412 ; Grant v. United States, 1 C. … Chew Heong v. United States, 112 U. S. 536 ; Johnson v. Browne, 205 U. S. 309 .

Franchi Construction Co. v. United States

609 F.2d 984 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1979

WPC Enterprises Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 1, 6-7 , 323 F.2d 874, 876-77 (1963). … Merando, Inc. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 23, 26-27 , 475 F.2d 601, 602-03 (1973); Bishop Eng’r Co. v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 411, 415 (1967); Blount Bros. Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct.

Nolan Brothers, Inc. v. The United States

437 F.2d 1371 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1971

General Builders Supply Co. v. … Co. v. United States, 379 F.2d 559, 564 , ff. 177 Ct.Cl. 870 , 880 ff. (1966); Bennett v. United States, 371 F.2d 859 , 178 Ct.Cl. 61 (1967); L. P. Reed, Inc., Eng. BCA Board Decision No. 711, pp. 21-22 (1955). 6 .

Bishop Engineering Co. v. United States

180 Ct. Cl. 411 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1967

On questions of law, a decision of the head of an agency or a board of contract appeals is not final against a plaintiff nor binding on the court. Kraus v. United States, 177 Ct. … Randolph Engineering Company v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 872 , 367 F. 2d 425 (1966); Southern Construction Company v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 1339 , 364 F. 2d 439 (1966); Jefferson Constmiction Company v.

Tecon Corporation and Green Construction Company, a Joint Venture, Trading as Tecon-Green v. The United States

411 F.2d 1262 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1969

Co. v. United States, 406 F.2d 1071 , 186 Ct.Cl. 836 (1969); Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, supra. … Rosenman Corp. v.

Prime Construction Co. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,111 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 2, 1982

The only question is whether plaintiffs original election to proceed via the board is binding so plaintiff cannot disavow it. Plaintiff relies heavily on our order in National Electric Coil v. … See e.g., Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 512 , 677 F.2d 876 (1982); Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 354 , 656 F.2d 644 (1981). Gregory Lumber Co. v.

Fannie Mae Clackum v. United States

296 F.2d 226 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1960

Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579 , 78 S.Ct. 433 , 2 L.Ed.2d 503 . . . ... ,. . . After her discharge, the plaintiff an- , . , ,. -r, v. • i t> - ‘ pealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. … The hearing was closed and the Discharge Review Board made the following “Findings After consideration of the evidence record> including the 201 file in the case, the Board finds: “a- That the discharge of the applicants

Lilley-Ames Company, Inc. v. United States

293 F.2d 630 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States, 143 Ct.Cl. 876, 878 . We think that as a matter of law the Government-furnished material was not fully in accord with the specifications. … Christensen Construction Co. v. United States, 72 Ct.Cl. 500, 514 . See also Chain Belt Company, a Wisconsin Corporation v. United States, 115 F. Supp. 701 , 127 Ct.Cl. 38, 58 .

Cloud v. United States

43 Ct. Cl. 69 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 9, 1907

Thus, in Wood v. United States ( 15 C. … (Leopold v. United States, 18 C. Cls., 546 ; Redgrave v. United States, 20 ibid., 226; Perkins v. United States, ibid., 438; 116 U. S. R., 474, 483 .)

J. E. Robertson Co. v. United States

437 F.2d 1360 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1971

Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943); United States v. Allegheny County, 322 U.S. 174, 183 (1944). … V, 1965-1969).

Multi-Roof Systems Co. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,530 · United States Court of Claims · May 30, 1984

Age Engineering, Inc. v. … a)(1); Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v.

Olympia Shipping Corp. v. United States

71 Ct. Cl. 251 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1930

’s attention to the provisions of the charter twice before the Shipping Board executed the contract and that, notwithstanding this fact and after the Shipping Board had presumably taken legal advice, it executed the contract … Atlantic Refining Co. v. United States, 69 C. Cls. *264 713 . New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United States, 29 Fed. (2d) 1014.

Smith v. United States

155 Ct. Cl. 682 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1961

Hearing was granted by the correction board. … Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 ; Watson v. United States, 142 Ct. Cl. 749 ; Glackum v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 404 , 296 F. 2d 226 .

Guy H. Briscoe v. The United States

442 F.2d 953 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1971

Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. United States, 84 F.Supp. 1021, 1022-1023 , 114 Ct.Cl. 286, 334 (1949); Fehlhaber Corp. v. … Cf., e. g., Pacific Alaska Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 436 F.2d 461 , 193 Ct.Cl. - (Jan. 1971); Wm. A. Smith Contracting Co. v. United States, 412 F.2d 1325 , 188 Ct.Cl. 1062 (1969); Woodcrest Constr. v.

Monterey Life Systems, Inc. v. United States

635 F.2d 821 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 13, 1980

DECISION OF THE BOARD This court’s review of the decision of the Provider Appeal Board is limited. The standard for such a review was established in our decision in Goldstein v. … Co. v.