Case law

Rogers v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 1023 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1992

Brown v. United States, 5 Ci.Ct. 1, 16 (1984). … See Pinkston v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 263, 265-67 (1984); Singleton v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 156, 164 (1984); South Louisiana Grain Services v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 281, 288 (1982). .

Robertson Electric Co. v. United States

176 Ct. Cl. 1287 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

River Construction Corp. v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 254 (1962). … Rolin v. United States, supra. .

Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United States

458 F.2d 42 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

See United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709 (1963). See note 4- supra. … In addition to cases cited in the board opinion, see Langoma Indus., Inc. v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 248 , 135 F. Supp. 282 (1955). Notes 3 and 7 supra. See note 1 supra.

Bredehorst v. United States

677 F.2d 87 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 21, 1982

of Appeals and Review (board). … Harrington v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 1110, 1117 (1966), quoting Guiness v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 1, 6 , cert. denied, 363 U.S. 819 (1960). See also Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct.

Ross v. United States

75 F. Supp. 725 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1948

The decision of the Board and its affirmation by the Circuit Court of Appeals were clearly correct under the law as it stood at that time. Higgins v. Commissioner, 312 U. S. 212 , and City Bank Co. v. Helvering, 313 U. … United States v. Borden Co., 308 U. S. 188 .

James H. Clack v. The United States

395 F.2d 773 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1968

Given this record, we can only conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s factual determination. Williamsburg Drapery Co. v. … Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, 345 F.2d 833 , 170 Ct.Cl. 757 (1965). Despite plaintiff’s arguments to the contrary, the Board could have given relief on this claim.

Fischbach & Moore International Corp. v. United States

617 F.2d 223 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1980

We agree that on this score there is grave doubt as to the correctness of the board’s legal ruling. See Framlau v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 185, 196-99 , 568 F.2d 687, 693-95 (1977); 13 Dravo Corp. v. … Corp. v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 364, 376-77 , 568 F.2d 1322, 1329 (1978); Manpower Inc. of Tidewater v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 726, 731 , 513 F.2d 1396, 1398 (1975); Universal Ecsco Corp. v.

Charles R. Nesbitt v. The United States

345 F.2d 583 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1965

John Reiner & Co. v. United States, 325 F.2d 438 , 163 Ct.Cl. 381 (1963) cert. denied, 377 U.S. 931 , 84 S.Ct. 1332 , 12 L.Ed.2d 295 (1964); Brown & Son Electric Co. v. … United States, 162 Ct.Cl. 566, 568-569 (1963); Brown & Son Electric Co. v-United States, supra, 325 F.2d at 450, 163 Ct.Cl. at 472; Litchfield Mfg. Corp. v. United States, supra, 338 F.2d at 96-97, 99.

Knightly v. United States

227 Ct. Cl. 767 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1981

United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976); United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 (1969). We cannot appoint or promote military or civilian personnel. It is not the business of the court to run the Army. Orloff v. … Kingsley v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 549 (1965).

George A. Fuller Co. v. United States

69 F. Supp. 409 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1947

Relevant proceedings of this board are set out in findings 10 to 16 in the case of Harwood-Nebel Construction Co. v. United States, 105 Ct.Cl. 116 , and were relied upon in support of the decision in that case. … Based in part upon the proceedings of this board, we held in Harwood-Nebel Construction Co. v. United States, supra, that the defendant was liable for damages caused by its delay. See pages 160 to 161 of 105 Ct.Cl.

Goodenough v. United States

19 F. Supp. 254 · United States Court of Claims · May 3, 1937

In the case last cited it was said: “In Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United States, 38 F.(2d) 144 , 69 Ct.Cl. 158 , and Arthur Curtiss James v. United States, 38. … . -, and Wood v. United States (Ct.Cl.) 17 F.Supp. 521 . In the early case of Toland v.

American President Lines, Ltd. v. United States

291 F.2d 931 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

Bull Steamship Company v. United States, 1952, 123 Ct.Cl. 520 , 108 F.Supp. 95 , and Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United States, 1953, 127 Ct.Cl. 409 , 119 F.Supp. 731 . … Other cases in this court applying comparably relevant principles are Clapp v. United States, 1954, 127 Ct.Cl. 505 , 117 F.Supp. 576 and Suwannee S. S. Corp. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 279 F.2d 874 .

Rumph v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 855 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 14, 1981

In DeBow v. United States, 193 Ct. … See, e.g., Hankins v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 32, 34 (1968), and decisions cited at 34, n.l. Resort to the Correction Board for the upgrading of a discharge is, however, permissive, not mandatory. E.g. Mathis v.

Soukaras v. United States

140 F. Supp. 797 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1956

C. § 2501 , supra, when the Secretary of War *92 approves the findings of the retiring board. Odell v. United States, 134 C. Cls. 634 ; Girault v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 135 . … Martilla v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 177 .

Kearney v. United States

156 F. Supp. 928 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1957

The Correction Board seems to have referred the case to a Naval Retiring Review Board which considered the case and reported to the Correction Board, which then found that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief. … Rafael San Millan, Jr. v. United States, 139 C. Cls. 485 . The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and the plaintiff’s petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

Teitelbaum v. United States

458 F.2d 72 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

The Board credited defendant’s, not plaintiff’s, proof on this point. 23 In this circumstance, the Board’s factual finding is entitled to finality. Ibid. See also Vann v. United States, 190 Ct. … Law v. United States, 195 Ct. Cl. 370 (1971); Boyajian v. United States, supra. 'Still to be assayed in the light of plaintiff’s strenuous challenges to them are, however, other “findings” of the Board.

Holt v. United States

140 F. Supp. 268 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1956

be presented to the Retiring Board. … Plaintiff claims that on the basis of the decisions in the cases of Hamrick v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 17 , and Ramsey v. United States, 123 C.

Griffin & Dickson v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,894 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 28, 1990

Contract boards of appeal must abide by this high standard. Metadure Corp. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 61 (1984). … the appeal to the Board.

Foote Mineral Co. v. United States

654 F.2d 81 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 1, 1981

The board has in a recent case held that brines containing sodium are not leaseable where the sodium deposits are not commercially valuable. United States v. Bardsley, 45 IBLA 367 (1980). … Ass’n v. United States, 225 Ct. Cl. 133 , 634 F.2d 526 (1980) (Medicare); Bur v. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. 52 , 621 F.2d 415 (1980) (civilian pay); Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.

John C. Kohler Co. v. United States

498 F.2d 1360 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

On review, the test to be applied is whether, on the basis of the evidence before it, the action taken by the Board was a reasonable one. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709, 715 (1963); Koppers Co. v. … The Board found that plaintiff had performed the tests. The Uniform Commercial Code is applicable to the field of public contracts. Harry Thuresson, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct.