Case law

General Electric Co.

215 Ct. Cl. 928 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1977

He also represented the United States in a separate patent action, Gould v. United States, Ct. Cl. … The attorney involved in Kesselhaut v. United States, 214 Ct.

Woodcrest Construction Company, Inc. And the Home Indemnity Company, as Completing Surety v. The United States

408 F.2d 406 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1969

In Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. … Schmid v. United States, 351 F.2d 651, 654 , 173 Ct.Cl. 302, 309 , (1965) ; Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v.

Centre Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. The United States

392 F.2d 229 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1968

Co. v. United States, 347 F.2d 235, 241 , 171 Ct.Cl. 70, 76 *233 (1965), citing, United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132 , 39 S.Ct. 59 , 63 L.Ed. 166 (1918). … Corp. v. United States, 360 F.2d 634 , 175 Ct.Cl. 518 (1966); J. D. Hedin Constr. Co., supra; R. M. Hollingshead Corp. v. United States, 111 F.Supp. 285 , 124 Ct.Cl. 681 (1953).

Robertson Electric Co. v. United States

176 Ct. Cl. 1287 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

River Construction Corp. v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 254 (1962). … Rolin v. United States, supra. .

Bredehorst v. United States

677 F.2d 87 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 21, 1982

of Appeals and Review (board). … Harrington v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 1110, 1117 (1966), quoting Guiness v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 1, 6 , cert. denied, 363 U.S. 819 (1960). See also Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct.

Soukaras v. United States

140 F. Supp. 797 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1956

C. § 2501 , supra, when the Secretary of War *92 approves the findings of the retiring board. Odell v. United States, 134 C. Cls. 634 ; Girault v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 135 . … Martilla v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 177 .

Ross v. United States

75 F. Supp. 725 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1948

The decision of the Board and its affirmation by the Circuit Court of Appeals were clearly correct under the law as it stood at that time. Higgins v. Commissioner, 312 U. S. 212 , and City Bank Co. v. Helvering, 313 U. … United States v. Borden Co., 308 U. S. 188 .

Foote Mineral Co. v. United States

654 F.2d 81 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 1, 1981

The board has in a recent case held that brines containing sodium are not leaseable where the sodium deposits are not commercially valuable. United States v. Bardsley, 45 IBLA 367 (1980). … Ass’n v. United States, 225 Ct. Cl. 133 , 634 F.2d 526 (1980) (Medicare); Bur v. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. 52 , 621 F.2d 415 (1980) (civilian pay); Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.

Harold Unterberg v. The United States

412 F.2d 1341 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

Towell v. United States, 150 Ct.Cl. 422 (1960); Uhley v. United States, 147 F.Supp. 497 , 137 Ct.Cl. 275 (1957). 3 . … See McCallin v. United States, 180 Ct.Cl. 220 (1967). The instant case is obviously distinguishable from Russell v.

Pfotzer

652 F.2d 69 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1981

[Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 579 (1975) (citations omitted) (emphasis added).] Accord, Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 377-78 (1971). … See, LSi *652 Service Corp. v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 185, 188 , 422 F.2d 1334, 1335-36 (1970). For these reasons, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and plaintiffs motion is denied.

Colonial Metals Co. v. United States

495 F.2d 1355 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1974

The Board disallowed both items of damages. … There is no need, therefore, to consider whether the findings relevant to the claim of breach are entitled to finality as relevantly made in the decision of a dispute properly before the Board (United States v.

Holt v. United States

140 F. Supp. 268 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1956

be presented to the Retiring Board. … Plaintiff claims that on the basis of the decisions in the cases of Hamrick v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 17 , and Ramsey v. United States, 123 C.

Goodenough v. United States

19 F. Supp. 254 · United States Court of Claims · May 3, 1937

In the case last cited it was said: “In Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United States, 38 F.(2d) 144 , 69 Ct.Cl. 158 , and Arthur Curtiss James v. United States, 38. … . -, and Wood v. United States (Ct.Cl.) 17 F.Supp. 521 . In the early case of Toland v.

American President Lines, Ltd. v. United States

291 F.2d 931 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

Bull Steamship Company v. United States, 1952, 123 Ct.Cl. 520 , 108 F.Supp. 95 , and Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United States, 1953, 127 Ct.Cl. 409 , 119 F.Supp. 731 . … Other cases in this court applying comparably relevant principles are Clapp v. United States, 1954, 127 Ct.Cl. 505 , 117 F.Supp. 576 and Suwannee S. S. Corp. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 279 F.2d 874 .

Hardeman-Monier-Hutcherson v. United States

458 F.2d 1364 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1972

Cl. 1302 , 364 F. 2d 357 (1966); Lenry, Inc. v. United States, 156 Ct. Cl. 46 , 297 F. 2d 550 (1962). The court holds that the board was correct. … Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 437 , 312 F. 2d 774 (1963). See also, e.g., Aerodex, Inc. v. United States, 189 Ct. Cl. 344 , 417 F. 2d 1361 (1969); J. A. Jones Constr. Co. v.

Rumph v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 855 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 14, 1981

In DeBow v. United States, 193 Ct. … See, e.g., Hankins v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 32, 34 (1968), and decisions cited at 34, n.l. Resort to the Correction Board for the upgrading of a discharge is, however, permissive, not mandatory. E.g. Mathis v.

Kearney v. United States

156 F. Supp. 928 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1957

The Correction Board seems to have referred the case to a Naval Retiring Review Board which considered the case and reported to the Correction Board, which then found that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief. … Rafael San Millan, Jr. v. United States, 139 C. Cls. 485 . The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and the plaintiff’s petition is dismissed. It is so ordered.

George A. Fuller Co. v. United States

69 F. Supp. 409 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1947

Relevant proceedings of this board are set out in findings 10 to 16 in the case of Harwood-Nebel Construction Co. v. United States, 105 Ct.Cl. 116 , and were relied upon in support of the decision in that case. … Based in part upon the proceedings of this board, we held in Harwood-Nebel Construction Co. v. United States, supra, that the defendant was liable for damages caused by its delay. See pages 160 to 161 of 105 Ct.Cl.

Griffin & Dickson v. United States

36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,894 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 28, 1990

Contract boards of appeal must abide by this high standard. Metadure Corp. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 61 (1984). … the appeal to the Board.

Continental Oil Co. v. United States

14 F. Supp. 533 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1936

Christopher Co. v. Commissioner, 60 App. D.C. 368 , 55 F.(2d) 530 ; Philip Carey Mfg. Co. v. Dean (C.C.A.) 58 F.(2d) 737 . … Phillips et al. v. Commissioner, 283 U.S. 589 , 51 S.Ct. 608 , 75 L.Ed. 1289 . The Board of Tax Appeals in a recent decision (Continental Oil Company v.